Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Next Article in Journal
Sprint Acceleration Mechanical Outputs Derived from Position– or Velocity–Time Data: A Multi-System Comparison Study
Previous Article in Journal
Sound Classification and Processing of Urban Environments: A Systematic Literature Review
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sensors
Volume 22
Issue 22
10.3390/s22228609
sensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

WS2 Nanorod as a Remarkable Acetone Sensor for Monitoring Work/Public Places

by
Rajneesh Kumar Mishra
1,
Vipin Kumar
1,
Le Gia Trung
1,
Gyu Jin Choi
1,
Jeong Won Ryu
1,
Sagar M. Mane
2,
Jae Cheol Shin
2,*,
Pushpendra Kumar
3,
Seung Hee Lee
4,5 and
Jin Seog Gwag
1,*
1
Department of Physics, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Korea
2
Division of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Seoul Campus, Dongguk University, Seoul 04620, Korea
3
Department of Physics, Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur 303007, India
4
Department of Nanoconvergence Engineering, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Korea
5
Department of Polymer Nano-Science and Technology, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2022, 22(22), 8609; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22228609
Submission received: 16 October 2022 / Revised: 3 November 2022 / Accepted: 4 November 2022 / Published: 8 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Advanced Nanomaterials for Sensing Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Here, we report the synthesis of the WS2 nanorods (NRs) using an eco-friendly and facile hydrothermal method for an acetone-sensing application. This study explores the acetone gas-sensing characteristics of the WS2 nanorod sensor for 5, 10, and 15 ppm concentrations at 25 °C, 50 °C, 75 °C, and 100 °C. The WS2 nanorod sensor shows the highest sensitivity of 94.5% at 100 °C for the 15 ppm acetone concentration. The WS2 nanorod sensor also reveals the outstanding selectivity of acetone compared to other gases, such as ammonia, ethanol, acetaldehyde, methanol, and xylene at 100 °C with a 15 ppm concentration. The estimated selectivity coefficient indicates that the selectivity of the WS2 nanorod acetone sensor is 7.1, 4.5, 3.7, 2.9, and 2.0 times higher than xylene, acetaldehyde, ammonia, methanol, and ethanol, respectively. In addition, the WS2 nanorod sensor also divulges remarkable stability of 98.5% during the 20 days of study. Therefore, it is concluded that the WS2 nanorod can be an excellent nanomaterial for developing acetone sensors for monitoring work/public places.

1. Introduction

The rapidly increasing industrial evolutions in the fields of agriculture, automobiles, biomedical, and food packaging have introduced significant concerns about environmental monitoring technologies, leading to the development of reliable and durable gas sensors [1]. The human exhaled breath contains numerous types of gases, such as ketones, nitric oxide, aldehydes, volatile organic compounds, acids, and hydrogen sulfide [2,3]. Therefore, exhaled human breath is a significant and rousing issue from the outlook of biomedical applications to inspect different diseases. Interestingly, the exhaled human breath contains nearly 870 volatile organic compound types, indicating exclusive evidence regarding metabolic disorders [4]. Therefore, studying exhaled human breath can provide insights into crucial results of humans’ normal or abnormal metabolic states arising from psychological stress [5]. Acetone molecules have been considered hazardous to human health and the environment. Acetone is a member of a family of volatile organic compounds that can influence the human nervous system and other organs under excessive exposure to concentrations of nearly 173 ppm [6]. Acetone is a vital aspect of the human metabolic system and can be examined through blood, breath, and urine [7,8]. It has been found to be a precise biomarker to recognize individuals with diabetes type-I due to the presence of high acetone vapor in the exhaled breath compared to healthy humans [9]. Various sensors, such as electrochemical, colorimetric, and resistive chemical gas, have been studied to detect acetone [10,11,12]. The colorimetric sensor provides low accuracy and requires additional setups such as airbags and pumps, which makes it very expensive [11]. However, the resistive chemical gas sensor offers high sensitivity, stability, fast responses, portability, and recovery, which makes it a cheap gas-sensing setup with low-cost sensor fabrication [12].
Among various transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs), tungsten disulfide (WS2) is considered the most prominent two-dimensional (2D) nanomaterial for developing novel applications [13]. 2D layered nanomaterials have been extensively examined because of their remarkable properties, such as physical, optical, electronic, and mechanical, which can stimulate their performance in various applications [14]. WS2, a member of the layered hexagonal family, is a promising nanomaterial with 0.62 nm interlayer spacing composed of covalently bonded S-W-S atoms, where each layer is weakly bonded by Van der Walls forces [15,16]. WS2 has no dangling bonds, which makes it extremely stable and non-reactive. It can absorb nearly 10% of the incident light due to its high absorption coefficient of 1.5 × 106 cm−1 [17]. It offers the desired engineering in the optical bandgap with high photoluminescence yields due to quantum confinements [18]. Interestingly, it exhibits an exclusive property of an engineering optical bandgap from an indirect optical bandgap of 1.4 eV (bulk) to a direct optical bandgap of 2.1 eV (monolayer), which provides a spin–orbit solid interaction [18,19]. Therefore, the WS2 nanostructure has been studied in numerous types of applications, such as monolayer-based field-effect transistors [20], solar cells [21], monolayer-based light-emitting diodes [22], gas sensors [23], neuromorphic devices [24], biosensors [25], supercapacitors [26], lithium-ion batteries [27], and electrocatalytic [28] and photocatalytic water splitting [29]. WS2 has been prepared using various methods, such as hydrothermal [30], solvothermal [31], chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [32], hot injection [33], thermal evaporation [34], and DC sputtering [35]. WS2 has been explored in various types of morphologies, such as quantum dots [36], heterostructures [37], nanowire-nanoflake [38], nanorods [39], nanoflowers [40], and nanosheets [41].
Recently, various morphologies of WS2 have been investigated for the detection of different types of gas. Liu et al. discussed the acetone gas-sensing behavior of WS2/WO3 heterojunctions [42]. The WS2/WO3-4 heterojunctions sensor offers reasonable sensitivity for acetone at a concentration of 20 ppm at 150 °C, selectivity in the presence of various hazardous gases, and stability for one month at a 150 °C working temperature for 20 ppm. Tang et al. inspected the NO2 gas-sensing performance of the WS2/IGZO p-n heterojunction sensor [23]. It shows a response of 230% for 5 ppm NO2 gas and 18,170% for 300 ppm NO2 gas. It also suggests that the recovery percentage increases with increasing the gas concentration. Kim et al. studied the WS2 nanosheet-based carbon monoxide gas sensor [43]. It depicts the CO response of 3 for 50 ppm concentration and the selective response of 3.75 for 50 ppm CO. It shows the response time of 339 s and recovery time of 567 s for 50 ppm CO. Ahmadvand et al. reported the ethanol sensor using the hybrid structure of the WS2 and graphene oxide nanoribbons (WS2/GONRs) [44]. It is observed that the WS2/GONRs show responses of 13.5 for 1 ppm and 438.5 for 21 ppm concentrations of ethanol at room temperature. Guang et al. explored ammonia sensing characteristics using the Au-coated WS2 [45]. It shows a good gas response of 452% for 10 ppm of ammonia at room temperature. It also proposes a response time of 96 and a recovery time of 76 at room temperature for 10 ppm ammonia. Asres et al. investigated the H2S sensing properties using the WS2 sensor [46]. It shows that the WS2 sensor behaves as a robust gas sensor for a high H2S response. However, very limited reports exist for acetone sensing using the WS2 sensing elements. Therefore, it is concluded that acetone detection using WS2 sensors needs more attention from researchers to develop an extremely selective, responsive, and long-life gas sensor.
In this study, the WS2 nanorods were prepared using the hydrothermal method for the acetone-sensing application. The WS2 nanorod sensor displays outstanding acetone-sensing properties for 15 ppm concentrations at an operating temperature of 100 °C. It is observed that the WS2 nanorod sensor shows a rapid response and fast recovery time. Furthermore, the WS2 nanorod sensor displays excellent acetone selectivity compared to other test gases. Moreover, the WS2 nanorod sensor reveals outstanding stability during its long-term use. Therefore, it is concluded that these unique properties make it a remarkable acetone sensor for future applications in work/public places.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials Synthesis

The tungsten(IV) chloride, thioacetamide, ethanol, polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS), xylene, methanol, N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP), ammonia, and acetaldehyde were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), which were utilized for the synthesis of WS2 nanorods as received.
The WS2 nanorods were prepared using a facile and eco-friendly hydrothermal process. In the synthesis process, 0.1904 g of the tungsten(IV) chloride compound was mixed in 80 mL of deionized (DI) water under dynamic stirring to achieve a good mixture. After that, 0.1803 g of thioacetamide was put into the prepared mixture solution using magnetic stirring to prepare a well-mixed solution. Furthermore, we added 1 mL of hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS) as a surfactant to control the morphology of the desired final product. Moreover, this prepared solution of tungsten(IV) chloride and thioacetamide was transferred to the 100 mL Teflon-lined autoclave. Further, this solution-filled autoclave was put into an air oven at 180 °C for twenty-four hours. Finally, the as-prepared nanomaterials were rinsed with ethanol and DI water. Further, it was dried at 70 °C for 10 h in a vacuum oven and processed with heat treatment at 200 °C for 3 h under a vacuum.

2.2. Materials Characterizations

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (JEOL JEM 2100F, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) was utilized to explore the structural, morphological, lattice spacings, and lattice planes of WS2 nanorods. In addition, the atomic-resolution high-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) and electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) were investigated using a JEOL, JEM-2100F, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan, to study the elemental color mapping of WS2 nanorods.

2.3. WS2 NRs-Based Sensor Fabrication and Measurements

The following process was used to fabricate the WS2 nanorods-based acetone sensor: The first binder solution of 0.5 g of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) was prepared using solvent N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) in a drop-wise manner. After that, we slowly added WS2 nanorod powder to the binder solution and mixed it well to obtain the desired solution for sensor fabrication. The WS2 nanorod gluey solution was coated on the glass substrate using drop-casting and dried slowly at 40 °C. Further, the silver paste was used to make contact on both sides of the film (deposited on glass) for the electrical connection. The gas-sensing measurements were conducted using the Keithley-2100 multimeter; however, the Motwane-454 multimeter was used to maintain the temperature inside the test chamber. The acetone gas-sensing measurements were investigated at 25 °C–100 °C for 5 ppm, 10 ppm, and 15 ppm concentrations. The acetone concentrations were injected into the test gas chamber using a Hamilton micro-syringe. In addition, the volume of the acetone concentrations (C, ppm) was estimated using Equation (1) [47]:
C   ( p p m ) = 22.4 × T × V l × ρ V × M × 1000
where C (ppm) is the desired acetone concentration, ρ (g L−1) is the liquid acetone density, Vl (μL) is the volume of the liquid acetone, M (g mol−1) is the molecular weight of the acetone, T (°C) is the working temperature of acetone sensing, and V is the acetone gas test chamber.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Morphological, Structural, and Elemental Study

Figure 1 shows the schematic depiction of synthesis, the crystal structure, and the acetone-sensing properties of the WS2 nanorods. It depicts the solution preparation of tungsten and thioacetamide with the HMDS surfactant. It also reveals the hydrothermal reaction conditions at 180 °C for 24 h. Furthermore, it verifies the successful synthesis of WS2 nanorods via TEM images. It shows the crystallographic illustration of the WS2 crystal structure and the visualization of the acetone-sensing mechanism. The detailed synthesis procedure was discussed in the material synthesis section. The detailed synthesis procedure was discussed in the acetone-sensing mechanism section.
Figure 2a–d display the morphology of the WS2 nanorods using the TEM at different scale bars. Figure 2a,b depict the agglomerations of the WS2 nanorods with various sizes and lengths. It seems to be overlapped, crossed WS2 nanorods, which can improve oxygen molecules’ conduction mechanism and interactions with the nanorods and gas-sensing properties. Figure 2c displays the WS2 nanorods whose length varies from nearly 20 nm to 200 nm. It also elucidates the WS2 nanorods whose widths fluctuate from 3 nm to 6 nm. Figure 2d shows several attached WS2 nanorods, forming various intersections between nanorods. It also reveals a thickness of 3 nm to 6 nm and a length of 20 nm to 200 nm of WS2 nanorods. It seems to develop several solid connections/attachments between the nanorods, which offer a large surface area, more adsorption, and chemisorption of atmospheric oxygen and gas molecules.
Figure 3a–e show the HRTEM and fast Fourier transform (FFT) patterns to explore the crystal structure, lattice spacing, and lattice planes of the WS2 nanorods. Figure 3a displays the HRTEM image of the WS2 nanorods with 2 to 5 nm thickness, and the length varies from 20 nm to 100 nm. Figure 3b,c reveal the magnified HRTEM images of the WS2 nanorods, indicating lattice spacings of 0.28 nm corresponding to the (100) lattice plane. Further, Figure 3d,e exhibit the FFT patterns of the WS2 nanorods to study the lattice plane and spacing, signifying the growth of the (100) lattice plane corresponding to the lattice spacing of 0.28 nm. The FFT pattern justifies the lattice spacing results, as shown in Figure 3a. The literature reports discussed similar HRTEM and FFT results of WS2 nanostructures [48,49].
In addition, the elemental information of the WS2 nanorods was studied using the HAADF image consistent with the color mapping of tungsten and sulfur elements. Figure 4a–c unveil the dark-field TEM (HAADF) image and corresponding elemental mapping of tungsten and sulfur elements of the WS2 nanorods. Figure 4a divulges the HAADF image of the WS2 nanorods to examine the elements’ composition and presence in the desired area. It also shows short to long WS2 nanorods with thin diameters. Figure 4b,c reveal the color mapping of tungsten and sulfur elements of the WS2 nanorods from the selected area (as shown in Figure 4a). It exhibits the presence of tungsten and sulfur elements over the selected area, confirming the successful formation of the WS2 composition. These results are well-matched and supported by the HRTEM and FFT results of the WS2.

3.2. Acetone-Sensing Characteristics

The temperature and test gas concentration mainly affect the gas-sensing properties of the sensor. Therefore, it is necessary to find the optimum working temperature for a specific gas concentration of the chemical gas sensors. In light of this, we investigated the acetone-sensing properties of the WS2 nanorod sensor at 25 °C–100 °C for 5 ppm, 10 ppm, and 15 ppm concentrations. The desired acetone concentration of the WS2 nanorod sensor was evaluated with the help of Equation (1). In addition, the acetone gas sensitivity [S (%)] of the WS2 nanorod sensor was estimated using Equation (2) [50]:
S ( % ) = R a − R a c e t o n e R a × 100
where Ra and Racetone are the resistances measured under air and different acetone gas concentrations at different operating temperatures.
Figure 5a shows the sensitivity vs. temperature plots of the WS2 nanorod sensor for 5, 10, and 15 ppm acetone concentrations. It is found that the sensitivity increases with the increasing acetone concentration and operating temperature of the WS2 nanorod sensor. The WS2 nanorod sensor shows the highest sensitivity of 94.5% for 15 ppm of acetone at 100 °C. However, the WS2 nanorod sensor reveals the lowest sensitivity of 18.5% for 5 ppm of acetone at 25 °C. The high sensitivity observed at 100 °C compared to the low sensitivity at 25 °C, 50 °C, and 75 °C for increasing concentrations may be attributable to the following reasons: (i) The high thermal energy at 100 °C (as compared to 25 °C) allows more thermally excited electrons to reach the conduction band, which can easily interact with the oxygen molecules to form the active site on the WS2 nanorod sensor surface; (ii) the large surface area of the 2D WS2 nanorod provides more interactions of oxygen molecules to form a large amount of active site on the sensor surface; (iii) the high electronic/ionic conductivity of WS2; (iv) high electronic and chemical responsiveness; and (v) rapid adsorption/desorption and extremely high diffusion of acetone molecules, leading to fast and outstanding sensitivity [51,52,53]. Figure 5b manifests the sensitivity vs. acetone concentration plots of the WS2 nanorod sensor at two operating temperatures of 25 °C and 100 °C. It is perceived that the WS2 nanorod sensor divulges low sensitivities of 18.5%, 24.7%, and 32.5% at an operating temperature of 25 °C for 5, 10, and 15 ppm of acetone, respectively. However, the WS2 nanorod sensor displays high sensitivities of 64.5%, 82.4%, and 94.5% at an operating temperature of 100 °C for 5, 10, and 15 ppm of acetone, respectively. It is also elucidated that the sensitivity increases with the acetone concentration at 25 °C and 100 °C. Many factors influence the sensitivity of the WS2 nanorod sensor due to the following reasons: (i) The high diffusion rate of gas molecules on the WS2 nanorod sensor surface due to the high concentration gradient of acetone molecules. The concentration gradient is proportional to the diffusion rate; therefore, acetone sensitivity increases with the acetone concentration at 25 °C and 100 °C. Furthermore, (ii) the acetone molecules formed a significant dipole moment due to the presence of the C-C=O group. It encourages the chemical adsorption/desorption and redox reaction capability of the WS2 nanorod sensor material [3,54].
Figure 6a shows the transient characteristic of the WS2 nanorod sensor at 25 °C and 100 °C for 5, 10, and 15 ppm of acetone. It shows a fast response and recovery at all acetone concentrations. It also exhibits that as the acetone concentration increases, the recovery and the response time decrease. This may be because of the enhanced chemisorption rate of acetone molecules on the WS2 nanorod sensor’s surface [55,56]. Figure 6b illustrates the response and recovery time plot of acetone molecules of the WS2 nanorod sensor. The response and recovery times were estimated when the WS2 nanorod sensor attained 90% of its maximum value and recovered 90% of its minimum value [57]. The WS2 nanorod sensor displays a quick response time of 3.02 min and a recovery time of 3.41 min at 100 °C for the 15 ppm concentration. This may be due to the high surface area of WS2 nanorods, rapid adsorption/desorption, and the chemisorption process. On the other hand, the reduction in the depletion layer and potential barrier height is due to more thermally excited electrons in the conduction band, leading to quick response and recovery [58,59].
Interestingly, the selectivity of the gas sensor plays a vital role in distinguishing the specific gas from various other gases. Here we investigated the selectivity of the WS2 nanorod sensor to six gases, including acetone. Figure 7a shows the sensitivity vs. test gas plots of the WS2 nanorod sensor at 100 °C for 15 ppm concentrations of various gas to disclose the selectivity behavior. It is detected that the WS2 nanorod sensor reveals the maximum sensitivity to acetone (94.5%) compared to the other gas, such as ethanol (46.4%), methanol (33.2%), ammonia (25.7%), acetaldehyde (21.2%), and xylene (13.2%) at 100 °C for 15 ppm concentrations. In addition, the selectivity coefficient (Cs) to quantify the sensitivity of the WS2 nanorod sensor was calculated using the following Equation (3) [60].
C s = S a c e t o n e S o t h e r   g a s  
The estimated values of Cs of the WS2 nanorod-based acetone sensor are 2.0 (ethanol), 2.9 (methanol), 3.7 (ammonia), 4.5 (acetaldehyde), and 7.1 (xylene). These Cs values indicate that the sensitivity of the WS2 nanorod sensor to acetone is 7.1, 4.5, 3.7, 2.9, and 2.0 times higher than xylene, acetaldehyde, ammonia, methanol, and ethanol, respectively. Therefore, it is concluded that the WS2 nanorod sensor is most suitable for acetone detection compared to other tested gases at 100 °C with 15 ppm concentrations. The lowest unoccupied orbital energy has different values for different gases [61]. Figure 7b depicts the stability plot of the WS2 nanorod sensor for 20 days for 15 ppm concentrations at 100 °C. The sensitivity of the WS2 nanorod sensor slowly reduces with time from 94.5% (on the 1st day) to 93.0% (on the 20th day). It also exhibits the excellent stability of the WS2 nanorod sensor of 98.5% over twenty days for a 15 ppm acetone concentration at 100 °C. The high stability of the WS2 nanorod sensor may be due to the excellent electrical and thermal conductivity of WS2. On the other hand, the nanorod’s large surface area also provides high exposure to acetone molecules and rapid interactions with the adsorbed oxygen-active ions (O−), leading to excellent stability.
In addition, a comparison between the various TMD-based acetone sensors has been discussed here with our observed results of the WS2 nanorod sensor. The MoS2-CuO nanocomposite sensor exhibited a high response of 16.21 for 10 ppm acetone at room temperature. It also showed a fast response of 61 s and recovery of 85 s [62]. The WS2/WO3 sensor has demonstrated a prolonged response time of 823 s and recovery time of 1093 s at 100 °C for 20 ppm acetone [42]. The decoration of Co3O4 on ZnS nanorods has been discussed regarding the acetone-sensing characteristics, which elucidated a high response of 1650% for 500 ppm acetone at room temperature under 2.2 mW cm−2 UV illumination [63]. A 2D SnS nanoflakes-based sensor displayed a high response of 1000%, a response time of ~35 s, and a recovery time of ~45 s at 100 °C for 10 ppm acetone [64]. SnS2-based sensors have demonstrated a high response of ~25, a response time of ~210 s, and a recovery time of ~600 s at 300 °C for 10 ppm acetone [65]. We found very limited reports on the WS2-based acetone sensor in the literature. Therefore, it is concluded that the WS2 nanorods could be a promising nanomaterial for an acetone sensor.

3.3. Oxygen Active Site Formation and Acetone Molecule Detection Mechanism

The acetone recognition mechanism of the WS2 nanorod sensor essentially depends on the change in sensor resistance during gas sensing. The chemisorption reaction among the adsorbed active sites (O−) on the WS2 nanorod surface and acetone molecules determines the gas-sensing process [66]. It regulates the concentration of oxygen molecules with the WS2 nanorod sensor surface and modulates the sensor resistance [67]. Equations (4)–(6) represent the interaction reactions of atmospheric oxygen molecules and the creation of active sites (O−) on the WS2 nanorod surface at different operating temperatures [51,68,69].
O 2 ( a t m o s p h e r i c ) ↔ O 2 ( a d s o r b e d )
O 2 ( a d s o r b e d ) + e − ↔ O 2 − ( a d s o r b e d )   <   100   ° C
O 2 − ( a d s o r b e d ) + e − ↔ 2 O − ( a d s o r b e d )   100   ° C – 300   ° C
These active oxygen ions/sites are responsible for interacting with the acetone molecules. Therefore, the possible reaction between the adsorbed active sites (O−) and acetone molecules on the WS2 nanorod sensor surface is discussed in Equation (7) [59,70].
C H 3 C O C H 3 + 8 O − ↔ 3 C O 2 + 3 H 2 O + 8 e −
Figure 8a–f show the schematic drawings of the oxygen adsorption reaction, depletion layer formation, the creation of a potential barrier, and reaction mechanisms of acetone molecules with the oxygen active sites (O−) on the WS2 nanorod surface. Figure 8a–c depict the schematic sketch of the creation of active sites on the WS2 nanorod sensor surface and depletion region in the electronic band structure. Firstly, atmospheric oxygen [O2(atmospheric)] was adsorbed on the WS2 nanorod sensor surface (O2(adsorbed)) using the process discussed in Equation (4). Further, it is expected that, below 100 °C, the adsorbed oxygen (O2(adsorbed)) interacts with the electrons in the conduction band and creates the active sites (O2−) on the WS2 surface, as discussed in Equation (5). After that, active sites (O2−) take more thermally excited electrons from the conduction band of the WS2 nanorod, finally creating the active sites (O−) on the WS2 nanorod sensor surface, as discussed in Equation (6). Figure 8b portrays a schematic view of the emergence of a depletion layer around the WS2 nanorod sensor surface during the adsorption process, which plays an intensive role in acetone sensing. Figure 8c describes the electronic band structure of the WS2 nanorod sensor following the various steps as discussed in Equations (4)–(6). It illustrates that the depletion layer and potential barrier are created during the adsorption and active site (O−) formation on the WS2 nanorod sensor. Similar reports have studied and discussed the exploration of the concept of the creation of active oxygen ions/sites in the literature [71,72,73]. Figure 8d reveals the graphical visualization of the interaction between acetone molecules and the active site (O−) on the WS2 nanorod sensor surface, following the process discussed in Equation (7), showing the liberation of CO2 gas, H2O, and electrons in the conduction band of the WS2 nanorod. Figure 8e discloses an illustration of the acetone-sensing mechanism (as discussed in Equation (7)) on the WS2 nanorod sensor surface and the release of carbon dioxide, water, and electrons. Figure 8f unveils the electronic band structure of the chemisorption of acetone molecules on the WS2 nanorod sensor (as discussed in Equation (7)). It is observed that the declining depletion region and the height of the potential barrier are created during the adsorption and creation of the active site (O−) on the WS2 nanorod surface. It also frees electrons in the conduction band of the WS2 nanorod sensor during the release of the carbon oxide and water molecules. The sensitivity of the acetone increases with increasing temperature and concentration due to the reduction in the depletion region and potential barrier heights, as schematically illustrated in Figure 8a–f, which supports the results discussed in Figure 5 and Figure 6. Similar reports of acetone-sensing mechanisms have been studied and discussed in the literature [73,74,75,76].

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we studied an acetone gas-sensing application based on WS2 nanorods (NRs). The WS2 nanorod sensor shows the highest sensitivity of 94.5% at 100 °C for 15 ppm acetone. It also discloses the admirable selectivity of acetone compared to other gases, such as xylene, methanol, ammonia, acetaldehyde, and ethanol at 100 °C with a 15 ppm concentration. Further, it demonstrates fantastic stability over 20 days at 100 °C for a 15 ppm concentration. Consequently, it is concluded that the WS2 nanorod can offer a new choice for fabricating reliable, low-cost, environmentally friendly acetone sensors for observing workplace safety.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.K.M. and J.S.G.; methodology, R.K.M., V.K. and J.S.G.; software, G.J.C. and J.W.R.; validation, L.G.T. and P.K.; formal analysis, S.M.M. and P.K.; investigation, S.M.M., G.J.C. and J.W.R.; resources, J.S.G., S.H.L. and J.C.S.; data curation, S.M.M., G.J.C. and J.W.R.; writing—original draft preparation, R.K.M.; writing—review and editing, R.K.M., S.H.L. and J.S.G.; visualization, R.K.M. and V.K.; supervision, R.K.M., S.H.L., J.C.S. and J.S.G.; project administration, J.S.G.; funding acquisition, J.S.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by a research grant from Yeungnam University (2021).

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a research grant from Yeungnam University (2021).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fu, Q.; Lyu, P.; Handschuh-Wang, S.; Teng, L.; Zheng, B. Facile synthesis of hierarchical Co3O4/MWCNT composites with enhanced acetone sensing property. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 28419–28427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhou, X.; Xue, Z.; Chen, X.; Huang, C.; Bai, W.; Lu, Z.; Wang, T. Nanomaterial-based gas sensors used for breath diagnosis. J. Mater. Chem. B 2020, 8, 3231–3248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lv, S.; Fan, J.; Liu, F.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, L.; Ouyang, S.; Zhang, C.; Wang, C.; Sun, P.; Wang, L.; et al. YSZ-based mixed potential type acetone gas sensor attached with CuSb2O6 sensing electrode for ketosis diagnosis. Sens. Actuators B 2022, 370, 132408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Costello, B.d.L.; Amann, A.; Al-Kateb, H.; Flynn, C.; Filipiak, W.; Khalid, T.; Osborne, D.; Ratcliffe, N.M. A review of the volatiles from the healthy human body. J. Breath Res. 2014, 8, 014001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Tai, H.; Wang, S.; Duan, Z.; Jiang, Y. Evolution of breath analysis based on humidity and gas sensors: Potential and challenges. Sens. Actuators B 2020, 318, 128104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, Z.; Wu, Y.; Du, H.; Sun, Y.; Sun, S.; Xu, S.; Cong, L.; Sun, P. Acetone sensing mechanism of Ar/O2 plasma modified indium oxide electrospun fibers: A combined DFT and experimental study. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 895, 162017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhu, Z.; Li, Z.; Xiong, X.; Hu, X.; Wang, X.; Li, N.; Jin, T.; Chen, Y. ZnO/ZnSe heterojunction nanocomposites with oxygen vacancies for acetone sensing. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 906, 164316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Oh, S.; Park, J.-S.; Lee, H.-J.; Jeong, H.M. Selective acetone gas sensing of Cu2(OH)3F/CuO enhanced by hydroxy bonds and fluorine substitution. Sens. Actuators B 2022, 372, 132662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Atanasova, G.; Dilova, T.; Dikovska, A.O.; Nikov, R.G.; Nedyalkov, N.N. Acetone-sensing properties of ZnO-noble-metals composite nanostructures and their improvement by light irradiation. Thin Solid Films 2022, 750, 139198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sharma, T.S.K.; Hwa, K.Y. Facile Synthesis of Ag/AgVO3/N-rGO Hybrid Nanocomposites for electrochemical detection of levofloxacin for complex biological samples using screen-printed carbon paste electrodes. Inorg. Chem. 2021, 60, 6585–6599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, D.; Zhang, F.; Prabhakar, A.; Qin, X.; Forzani, E.S.; Tao, N. Colorimetric sensor for online accurate detection of breath acetone. ACS Sens. 2021, 6, 450–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Majhi, S.M.; Ali, A.; Greish, Y.E.; El-Maghraby, H.F.; Qamhieh, N.N.; Hajamohideen, A.R.; Mahmoud, S.T. Accordion-like-Ti3C2 MXene-based gas sensors with sub-ppm level detection of acetone at room temperature. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2022, 4, 4094–4103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Huang, G.; Liu, H.; Wang, S.; Yang, X.; Liu, B.; Chen, H.; Xu, M. Hierarchical architecture of WS2 nanosheets on graphene frameworks with enhanced electrochemical properties for lithium storage and hydrogen evolution. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 24128–24138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, Y.; Sun, M. Two-dimensional WS2/MoS2 heterostructures: Properties and applications. Nanoscale 2021, 13, 5594–5619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Miao, W.; Gai, X.; Zhao, F.; Wang, J. Excitation induced asymmetric fluorescence emission in 2D-WS2 quantum dots. Mater. Adv. 2022, 3, 1772–1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Luo, X.; Huang, J.; Huang, Y.; Cao, L.; Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Xu, Z.; Wei, S.; Kajiyoshi, K. Self-templated induced carbon-supported hollow WS2 composite structure for high-performance sodium storage. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 21366–21378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Villamayor, M.M.S.; Lindblad, A.; Johansson, F.O.L.; Tran, T.; Pham, N.H.; Primetzhofer, D.; Sorgenfrei, N.L.A.N.; Giangrisotomi, E.; Fohlisch, A.; Lourenço, P.; et al. Growth of two-dimensional WS2 thin films by reactive sputtering. Vacuum 2021, 188, 110205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Das, R.; Bora, A.; Giri, P.K. Quantitative understanding of the ultra-sensitive and selective detection of dopamine using a graphene oxide/WS2 quantum dot hybrid. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 7935–7946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jo, S.; Ubrig, N.; Berger, H.; Kuzmenko, A.B.; Morpurgo, A.F. Mono- and bilayer WS2 light-emitting transistors. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 2019–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Sebastian, A.; Pendurthi, R.; Choudhury, T.H.; Redwing, J.M.; Das, S. Benchmarking monolayer MoS2 and WS2 field-effect transistors. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rafiq, M.K.S.B.; Amin, N.; Alharbi, H.F.; Luqman, M.; Ayob, A.; Alharthi, Y.S.; Alharthi, N.H.; Bais, B.; Akhtaruzzaman, M. WS2: A new window layer material for solar cell application. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Sheng, Y.; Chen, T.; Lu, Y.; Chang, R.-J.; Sinha, S.; Warner, J.H. High-performance WS2 monolayer light emitting tunneling devices using 2D materials grown by chemical vapor deposition. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 4530–4537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Tang, H.; Li, Y.; Sokolovskij, R.; Sacco, L.; Zheng, H.; Ye, H.; Yu, H.; Fan, X.; Tian, H.; Ren, T.-L.; et al. Ultra-high sensitive NO2 gas sensor based on tunable polarity transport in CVD-WS2/IGZO p-N heterojunction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 40850–40859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yan, X.; Zhao, Q.; Chen, A.P.; Zhao, J.; Zhou, Z.; Wang, J.; Wang, H.; Zhang, L.; Li, X.; Xiao, Z.; et al. Vacancy-induced synaptic behavior in 2D WS2 nanosheet-based memristor for low-power neuromorphic computing. Small 2019, 15, 1901423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zuo, X.; Dai, H.; Zhang, H.; Liu, J.; Ma, S.; Chen, X. A peptide-WS2 nanosheet based biosensing platform for determination of β-secretase and screening of its inhibitors. Analyst 2018, 143, 4585–4591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, S.; Zeng, Y.; Zhang, M.; Xie, S.; Tong, Y.; Cheng, F.; Lu, X. Binder-free WS2 nanosheets with enhanced crystallinity as a stable negative electrode for flexible asymmetric supercapacitors. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 21460–21466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yin, L.; Pham-Cong, D.; Jeon, I.; Kim, J.-P.; Cho, J.; Jeong, S.-Y.; Lee, H.W.; Cho, C.-R. Electrochemical performance of vertically grown WS2 layers on TiNb2O7 nanostructures for lithium-ion battery anodes. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 382, 122800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, D.; Li, Q.; Han, C.; Xing, Z.; Yang, X. When NiO@Ni meets WS2 nanosheet array: A highly efficient and ultrastable electrocatalyst for overall water splitting. ACS Cent. Sci. 2018, 4, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Zhu, B.; Zhang, F.; Qiu, J.; Chen, X.; Zheng, K.; Guo, H.; Yu, J.; Bao, J. A novel Hf2CO2/WS2 van der Waals heterostructure as a potential candidate for overall water splitting photocatalyst. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2021, 133, 105947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Piao, M.; Chu, J.; Wang, X.; Chi, Y.; Zhang, H.; Li, C.; Shi, H.; Joo, M.-K. Hydrothermal synthesis of stable metallic 1T phase WS2 nanosheets for thermoelectric application. Nanotechnology 2018, 29, 025705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yi, J.; She, X.; Song, Y.; Mao, M.; Xia, K.; Xu, Y.; Mo, Z.; Wu, J.; Xu, H.; Li, H. Solvothermal synthesis of metallic 1T-WS2: A supporting co-catalyst on carbon nitride nanosheets toward photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 335, 282–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fu, Q.; Wang, W.; Yang, L.; Huang, J.; Zhang, J.; Xiang, B. Controllable synthesis of high quality monolayer WS2 on a SiO2/Si substrate by chemical vapor deposition. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 15795–15799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhou, P.; Tanghe, I.; Schiettecatte, P.; van Thourhout, D.; Hens, Z.; Geiregat, P. Ultrafast carrier dynamics in colloidal WS2 nanosheets obtained through a hot injection synthesis. J. Chem. Phys. 2019, 151, 164701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Chen, J.; Shao, K.; Yang, W.; Tang, W.; Zhou, J.; He, Q.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, C.; Li, X.; Yang, X.; et al. Synthesis of wafer-scale monolayer WS2 crystals toward the application in integrated electronic devices. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 19381–19387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ballif, C.; Regula, M.; Schmid, P.E.; Remskar, M.; Sanjines, R.; Levy, F. Preparation and characterization of highly oriented, photoconducting WS2 thin films. Appl. Phys. A 1996, 62, 543–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kim, M.-J.; Jeon, S.-J.; Kang, T.W.; Ju, J.-M.; Yim, D.; Kim, H.-I.; Park, J.H.; Kim, J.-H. 2H-WS2 quantum dots produced by modulating the dimension and phase of 1t-nanosheets for antibody-free optical sensing of neurotransmitters. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 12316–12323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, D.; Zhang, Z.; Huang, B.; Zhang, H.; Huang, Z.; Liu, M.; Duan, X. Few-layer WS2-WSe2 lateral heterostructures: Influence of the gas precursor selenium/tungsten ratio on the number of layers. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 1198–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Asres, G.A.; Dombovari, A.; Sipola, T.; Puskás, R.; Kukovecz, A.; Kónya, Z.; Popov, A.; Lin, J.-F.; Lorite, G.S.; Mohl, M.; et al. A novel WS2 nanowire-nanoflake hybrid material synthesized from WO3 nanowires in sulfur vapor. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 25610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Zhang, L.L.; Tu, J.P.; Wu, H.M.; Yang, Y.Z. WS2 nanorods prepared by self-transformation process and their tribological properties as additive in base oil. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2007, 454–455, 487–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mohan, V.V.; Manuraj, M.; Anjana, P.M.; Rakhi, R.B. WS2 nanoflowers as efficient electrode materials for supercapacitors. Energy Technol. 2022, 10, 2100976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sharma, P.; Kumar, A.; Bankuru, S.; Chakraborty, J.; Puravankara, S. Large-scale surfactant-free synthesis of WS2 nanosheets: An investigation into the detailed reaction chemistry of colloidal precipitation and their application as an anode material for lithium-ion and sodium-ion batteries. New J. Chem. 2020, 44, 1594–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, X.; Xu, J.; Cheng, Z.; Yang, J.; Li, Y. A sensitive acetone sensor based on WS2/WO3 nanosheets with p-n heterojunctions. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2022, 5, 12592–12599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kim, J.-H.; Sakaguchi, I.; Hishita, S.; Ohsawa, T.; Suzuki, T.T.; Saito, N. Ru-implanted WS2 nanosheet gas sensors to enhance sensing performance towards CO gas in self-heating mode. Sens. Actuators B 2022, 370, 132454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ahmadvand, H.; Zad, A.I.; Mohammadpour, R.; Hosseini-Shokouh, S.H.; Asadian, E. Room temperature and high response ethanol sensor based on two dimensional hybrid nanostructures of WS2/GONRs. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 14799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Guang, Q.; Huang, B.; Li, X. Au-decorated WS2 microflakes based sensors for selective ammonia detection at room temperature. Chemosensors 2022, 10, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Asres, G.A.; Baldoví, J.J.; Dombovari, A.; Järvinen, T.; Lorite, G.S.; Mohl, M.; Shchukarev, A.; Paz, A.P.; Xian, L.; Mikkola, J.-P.; et al. Ultrasensitive H2S gas sensors based on p-type WS2 hybrid materials. Nano Res. 2018, 11, 4215–4224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Gupta, M.; Chaudhary, P.; Singh, A.; Verma, A.; Yadav, D.; Yadav, B.C. Development of MoO3-CdO nanoparticles-based sensing device for the detection of harmful acetone levels in our skin and body via nail paint remover. Sens. Actuators B 2022, 368, 132102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Huang, F.; Jian, J.; Wu, R. Few-layer thick WS2 nanosheets produced by intercalation/exfoliation route. J. Mater. Sci. 2016, 51, 10160–10165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rout, C.S.; Joshi, P.D.; Kashid, R.V.; Joag, D.S.; More, M.A.; Simbeck, A.J.; Washington, M.; Nayak, S.K.; Late, D.J. Superior field emission properties of layered WS2-RGO nanocomposites. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 3282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Su, P.-G.; Lin-Kuo, S. H2-gas sensing and discriminating actions of a single-yarn sensor based on a Pd/GO multilayered thin film using FFT. Anal. Methods 2020, 12, 3537–3544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chen, L.; Song, Y.; Yu, Q.; Dong, H.; Pan, C.; Wang, D.; Liu, J.; Chen, X. High-performance acetone sensor based on electrospun Tb-doped α-Fe2O3 nanotubes. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 26828–26835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Guo, L.; Shen, Z.; Ma, C.; Ma, C.; Wang, J.; Yuan, T. Gas sensor based on MOFs-derived Au-loaded SnO2 nanosheets for enhanced acetone detection. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 906, 164375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Feng, G.; Che, Y.; Wang, S.; Wang, S.; Hu, J.; Xiao, J.; Song, C.; Jiang, L. Sensitivity enhancement of In2O3/ZrO2 composite based acetone gas sensor: A promising collaborative approach of ZrO2 as the heterojunction and dopant for in-situ grown octahedron-like particles. Sens. Actuators B 2022, 367, 132087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhu, L.-Y.; Yuan, K.; Li, Z.-C.; Miao, X.-Y.; Wang, J.-C.; Sun, S.; Devi, A.; Lu, H.-L. Highly sensitive and stable MEMS acetone sensors based on well-designed α-Fe2O3/C mesoporous nanorods. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 622, 156–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Cai, L.; Dong, X.; Wu, G.; Sun, J.; Chen, N.; Wei, H.; Zhu, S.; Tian, Q.; Wang, X.; Jing, Q.; et al. Ultrasensitive acetone gas sensor can distinguish the diabetic state of people and its high performance analysis by first-principles calculation. Sens. Actuators B 2022, 351, 130863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhang, H.-J.; Liu, L.-Z.; Zhang, X.-R.; Zhang, S.; Meng, F.-N. Microwave-assisted solvothermal synthesis of shape-controlled CoFe2O4 nanoparticles for acetone sensor. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 788, 1103–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bhati, V.S.; Kumar, M.; Banerjee, R. Gas sensing performance of 2D nanomaterials/metal oxide nanocomposites: A review. J. Mater. Chem. C 2021, 9, 8776–8808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Liang, Y.-C.; Hung, C.-S. Design of hydrothermally derived Fe2O3 rods with enhanced dual functionality via sputtering decoration of a thin ZnO coverage layer. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 16272–16283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kaur, N.; Singh, M.; Comini, E. One-dimensional nanostructured oxide chemoresistive sensors. Langmuir 2020, 36, 6326–6344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Siemons, M.; Simon, U. Gas sensing properties of volume-doped CoTiO3 synthesized via polyol method. Sens. Actuators B 2007, 126, 595–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhou, X.; Li, X.; Sun, H.; Sun, P.; Liang, X.; Liu, F.; Hu, X.; Lu, G. Nanosheet-assembled ZnFe2O4 hollow microspheres for high-sensitive acetone sensor. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 15414–15421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Roy, N.; Sinha, R.; Nemade, H.B.; Mandal, T.K. Synthesis of MoS2-CuO nanocomposite for room temperature acetone sensing application. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 910, 164891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Park, S.; Sun, G.-J.; Kim, S.; Lee, S.; Lee, C. UV-enhanced acetone gas sensing of Co3O4-decorated ZnS nanorod gas sensors. Electron. Mater. Lett. 2015, 11, 572–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Afsar, M.F.; Rafiq, M.A.; Tok, A.I.Y. Two-dimensional SnS nanoflakes: Synthesis and application to acetone and alcohol sensors. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 21556–21566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Giberti, A.; Gaiardo, A.; Fabbri, B.; Gherardi, S.; Guidi, V.; Malagù, C.; Bellutti, P.; Zonta, G.; Casotti, D.; Cruciani, G. Tin(IV) sulfide nanorods as a new gas sensing material. Sens. Actuators B 2016, 223, 827–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Mishra, R.K.; Choi, G.J.; Mishra, Y.K.; Kaushik, A.; Sohn, Y.; Lee, S.H.; Gwag, J.S. A highly stable, selective, and high-performance VOC sensor using a SnS2 nano-lotus structure. J. Mater. Chem. C 2021, 9, 7713–7725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Tang, H.; Sacco, L.N.; Vollebregt, S.; Ye, H.; Fan, X.; Zhang, G. Recent advances in 2D/nanostructured metal sulfide-based gas sensors: Mechanisms, applications, and perspectives. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 24943–24976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Li, Z.; Li, H.; Wu, Z.; Wang, M.; Luo, J.; Torun, H.; Hu, P.; Yang, C.; Grundmann, M.; Liu, X.; et al. Advances in designs and mechanisms of semiconducting metal oxide nanostructures for high-precision gas sensors operated at room temperature. Mater. Horiz. 2019, 6, 470–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Baharuddin, A.A.; Ang, B.C.; Haseeb, A.S.M.A.; Wong, Y.C.; Wong, Y.H. Advances in chemiresistive sensors for acetone gas detection. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2019, 103, 104616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kim, D.H.; Shim, Y.-S.; Jeon, J.-M.; Jeong, H.Y.; Park, S.S.; Kim, Y.-W.; Kim, J.-S.; Lee, J.-H.; Jang, H.W. Vertically ordered hematite nanotube array as an ultrasensitive and rapid response acetone sensor. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 14779–14784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Yuan, K.; Wang, C.-Y.; Zhu, L.-Y.; Cao, Q.; Yang, J.-H.; Li, X.-X.; Huang, W.; Wang, Y.-Y.; Lu, H.-L.; Zhang, D.W. Fabrication of a micro-electromechanical system-based acetone gas sensor using CeO2 nanodot-decorated WO3 nanowires. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 14095–14104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Li, C.; Zhou, H.; Yang, S.; Wei, L.; Han, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Pan, H. Preadsorption of O2 on the exposed (001) facets of ZnO nanostructures for enhanced sensing of gaseous acetone. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2019, 2, 6144–6151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Sen, S.; Maity, S.; Kundu, S. Fabrication of Fe doped reduced graphene oxide (rGO) decorated WO3 based low temperature ppm level acetone sensor: Unveiling sensing mechanism by impedance spectroscopy. Sens. Actuators B 2022, 361, 131706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Cai, Z.; Park, S. Highly selective acetone sensor based on Co3O4-decorated porous TiO2 nanofibers. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 919, 165875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Jin, R.; Jiang, Y.; Zhao, L.; Wang, T.; Liu, X.; Liu, F.; Yan, X.; Sun, P.; Lu, G. High sensitivity and low detection limit of acetone sensor based on Ru-doped Co3O4 flower-like hollow microspheres. Sens. Actuators B 2022, 363, 131839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Jin, S.; Wu, D.; Song, W.; Hao, H.; Gao, W.; Yan, S. Superior acetone sensor based on hetero-interface of SnSe2/SnO2 quasi core shell nanoparticles for previewing diabetes. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 621, 119–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sensors 22 08609 g001 550
Figure 1. Concept of the WS2 nanorod synthesis method. Crystallographic presentation of WS2 crystal structure. Graphic of the acetone-sensing mechanism of the WS2 sensor. Visualization and interactions of molecules and electrons during acetone sensing of WS2 sensor.
Figure 1. Concept of the WS2 nanorod synthesis method. Crystallographic presentation of WS2 crystal structure. Graphic of the acetone-sensing mechanism of the WS2 sensor. Visualization and interactions of molecules and electrons during acetone sensing of WS2 sensor.
Sensors 22 08609 g001
Sensors 22 08609 g002 550
Figure 2. (a–d) TEM images of the WS2 nanorods at the different scales.
Figure 2. (a–d) TEM images of the WS2 nanorods at the different scales.
Sensors 22 08609 g002
Sensors 22 08609 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) HRTEM image, (b,c) magnified HRTEM images, and corresponding (d,e) FFT patterns of the WS2 nanorods.
Figure 3. (a) HRTEM image, (b,c) magnified HRTEM images, and corresponding (d,e) FFT patterns of the WS2 nanorods.
Sensors 22 08609 g003
Sensors 22 08609 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) HAADF image and corresponding color mapping of (b) tungsten and (c) sulfur elements of the WS2 nanorods.
Figure 4. (a) HAADF image and corresponding color mapping of (b) tungsten and (c) sulfur elements of the WS2 nanorods.
Sensors 22 08609 g004
Sensors 22 08609 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) Acetone sensitivity vs. temperature plots and (b) acetone sensitivity vs. concentration plots of the WS2 nanorod sensor.
Figure 5. (a) Acetone sensitivity vs. temperature plots and (b) acetone sensitivity vs. concentration plots of the WS2 nanorod sensor.
Sensors 22 08609 g005
Sensors 22 08609 g006 550
Figure 6. The WS2 nanorod sensor: (a) Transient characteristics at 25 °C and 100 °C for 5, 10, and 15 ppm acetone concentrations and (b) estimation of response and recovery time at 100 °C for 15 ppm of acetone.
Figure 6. The WS2 nanorod sensor: (a) Transient characteristics at 25 °C and 100 °C for 5, 10, and 15 ppm acetone concentrations and (b) estimation of response and recovery time at 100 °C for 15 ppm of acetone.
Sensors 22 08609 g006
Sensors 22 08609 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) Selectivity and (b) stability and corresponding sensitivity of the WS2 nanorod sensor.
Figure 7. (a) Selectivity and (b) stability and corresponding sensitivity of the WS2 nanorod sensor.
Sensors 22 08609 g007
Sensors 22 08609 g008 550
Figure 8. WS2 nanorod sensor: (a,d) Graphical illustration of adsorption of oxygen via electron interactions, formation of the active sites on the surface, and interaction of active sites with the acetone molecules; (b,e) visualization of a depletion layer formation around the WS2 nanorod by adsorbed active sites, and acetone-sensing reaction mechanism; (c,f) electronic band structure during active site formation and chemisorption of acetone molecules of the WS2 nanorod sensor.
Figure 8. WS2 nanorod sensor: (a,d) Graphical illustration of adsorption of oxygen via electron interactions, formation of the active sites on the surface, and interaction of active sites with the acetone molecules; (b,e) visualization of a depletion layer formation around the WS2 nanorod by adsorbed active sites, and acetone-sensing reaction mechanism; (c,f) electronic band structure during active site formation and chemisorption of acetone molecules of the WS2 nanorod sensor.
Sensors 22 08609 g008
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mishra, R.K.; Kumar, V.; Trung, L.G.; Choi, G.J.; Ryu, J.W.; Mane, S.M.; Shin, J.C.; Kumar, P.; Lee, S.H.; Gwag, J.S. WS2 Nanorod as a Remarkable Acetone Sensor for Monitoring Work/Public Places. Sensors 2022, 22, 8609. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22228609

AMA Style

Mishra RK, Kumar V, Trung LG, Choi GJ, Ryu JW, Mane SM, Shin JC, Kumar P, Lee SH, Gwag JS. WS2 Nanorod as a Remarkable Acetone Sensor for Monitoring Work/Public Places. Sensors. 2022; 22(22):8609. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22228609

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mishra, Rajneesh Kumar, Vipin Kumar, Le Gia Trung, Gyu Jin Choi, Jeong Won Ryu, Sagar M. Mane, Jae Cheol Shin, Pushpendra Kumar, Seung Hee Lee, and Jin Seog Gwag. 2022. "WS2 Nanorod as a Remarkable Acetone Sensor for Monitoring Work/Public Places" Sensors 22, no. 22: 8609. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22228609

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop