Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Next Article in Journal
A Comparison of CSR Image Construction between Chinese and American Petroleum Companies in the Context of Ecological Transition
Previous Article in Journal
Catalytic Effect of Green Human Resource Practices on Sustainable Development Goals: Can Individual Values Moderate an Empirical Validation in a Developing Economy?
Previous Article in Special Issue
European Green Deal: Threats Assessment for Agri-Food Exporting Countries to the EU
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Phytoextracts as Crop Biostimulants and Natural Protective Agents—A Critical Review

1
Department of Botany, Government College University, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
2
Office of Academic Research, Office of VP for Research & Graduate Studies, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar
3
Institute of Chemistry, University of Sargodha, Sargodha 40100, Pakistan
4
Department of Plant Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad 45320, Pakistan
5
Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, The University of Lahore, Lahore 54590, Pakistan
6
Smart-Health Initiative (SHI) and Red Sea Research Center (RSRC), Division of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering (BESE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955, Saudi Arabia
7
Department of Pharmaceutics, Unaizah College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Unaizah 51911, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(21), 14498; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114498
Submission received: 17 July 2022 / Revised: 2 October 2022 / Accepted: 3 October 2022 / Published: 4 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Biostimulant Applications and Sustainable Crop Production)

Abstract

:
Excessive application of synthetic chemicals to crops is a serious environmental concern. This review suggests that some potential natural compounds can be used as alternatives and could be applied directly to plants to improve crop growth and productivity. These phytoextracts can serve as biostimulants to induce abiotic and biotic stress tolerance in different crops growing under diverse environmental conditions. The biosynthesis and accumulation of a variety of chemical compounds such as glycinebetaine, vitamins, nutrients, and secondary metabolites in some plants are of great value and an environmentally friendly cheaper source than several synthetic substances of a similar nature. The review summarizes the information regarding the potential role of different plant phytoextracts and suggests subsequent applications to modulate crop stress tolerance. Future studies should focus on the relative effectiveness of these plant-based extracts compared with their synthetic counterparts and focus on practical applications to signify sustainable practices linked with the use of natural products.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The concept of sustainable agricultural practices is still a dream, although the idea was presented a long time ago [1,2]. Farmers and researchers of this modern era utilize synthetic chemicals as growth stimulants, herbicides, insecticides, and repellants at mass scale, as well as several synthetic amendments to enhance soil fertility [3]. A comparatively recent approach is to use synthetic nanomaterials for various agricultural practices (fertilizers, pesticides, nano-nutrient and pesticide carriers) and its associated risks remain questionable [4,5]. Biostimulants are natural or synthetic substances that can be applied to seeds, plants, and soil. These substances cause changes in vital and structural processes in order to influence plant growth through improved tolerance to abiotic stresses and increase seed and/or grain yield and quality [6]. Soil content is regulated by a number of aspects, such as organic carbon content, moisture, nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium contents, and biotic/abiotic factors. However, indiscriminate use of fertilizers, particularly nitrogen and phosphorus, has led to substantial pollution of soil by reducing pH and exchangeable bases; thus, these nutrients become unavailable to crops, leading to loss of productivity [7,8,9]. The pace at which modern farmers have shifted towards the use of synthetic compounds are alarming and the contamination of terrestrial and aquatic environment, entry into food chain and associated hearth risks has become a concern [10,11]. Such intensive use of synthetic compounds should be revisited before it is too late.
In the present review, an alternative approach is presented to encourage the use of plant extracts to enhance plant growth, productivity and agents for crop protection, and to improve the ecosystem services therein. Plants are typically exposed to myriad biotic and abiotic stresses, including feeding from wild animals and insects, weed infestation, hail, mechanical injury, diseases, low soil fertility, drought, salinity and others that can diminish the plant photosynthetic area, thus attaining total plant biomass or grain yield [12,13,14]. Research has been continuing to develop effective methods for crops under stress and non-stress conditions. Exogenous application of plant growth regulators, essential/beneficial nutrients, antioxidants and osmoprotectants has been reported to be effective in improving stress tolerance among plants [15,16]. Regarding the use of synthetic compounds, not only cost, but also duration of effectiveness, availability at commercial level, general acceptance, applicability to heavy metals and organic wastes, mobility, and volume reduction, are also important. Plants can serve as a cheap natural source of bioactive compounds and secondary metabolites enriched with beneficial compounds [17,18]. The present review summarizes how different phytoextracts can be used to improve plant growth under diverse environmental conditions.

2. Phytoextrants

Plants are the basic source of food, energy and dietary fibers for mankind [19]. However, the production of cereal crops affected due to various biotic and abiotic factors due to anthropogenic activities [20,21,22]. Fungal pathogens are responsible for plant diseases and cause high economic losses [23,24]. Synthetic fungicides, which are toxic and harmful to the environment, are used to control plant diseases caused by fungal pathogens; nowadays, the trend is shifting towards healthy, safe and sound ecofriendly control of fungal pathogens [25]. Phytoextracts of Beta vulgaris, Moringa oleifera, Citrus sinensis, Melia azedarach and Azadirachta indica significantly inhibited the fungal growth and spore germination [26,27]. The details of these phytoextracts studied under the abiotic stresses in plants are as follows:

2.1. Beta vulgaris—Source of Glycinebetaine

Economically important cultivated beets such as fodder beets, sugar beets, garden beets (e.g., red beet) and leaf beets (e.g., Swiss chard) belong to the sub-species Beta vulgaris [28]. All beets originate from a halophytic plant, Beta vulgaris (sea beet or wild beet). Glycinebetaine (GB) is a quaternary ammonium compound naturally synthesized by various plant species. Involvement of GB in the protection of native protein from denaturation, cell membranes from oxidative damage and its contribution to cellular osmotic adjustments under water-limited environment make it a vital plant-osmolyte [29]. It is also involved in the regulation of various biochemical processes via systematic signaling pathways and studies also suggested its positive contribution to carbon, nitrogen reserves and reactive oxygen species neutralization [30]. Although several studies report different responses of Beta vulgaris to environmental stresses, research articles and reviews mostly focus on salt and drought response mechanisms in beets [31,32]. Therefore, we need breeding techniques and agronomic practices for better tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses in B. vulgaris [33]. Thus, cultivated beets and their wild ancestor are important genetic sources for crop breeding programs and studying abiotic stress tolerance [32]. Sugar beet belongs to the family Chenopodiaceae, and beetroot also contains a significant fraction of antioxidants and other bioactive compounds such as betaine, betalain and ferulic acid [31]. Glycinebetaine was primarily discovered from sugar beet (Beta vulgaris), which accumulates GB up to 100 mM concentration [34]. These compounds can improve agricultural productivity through mitigation of adverse effects of environmental stresses on cultivated crops.
The exogenous application of GB improved plant growth and productivity under different stress conditions (Table 1). Nowadays, a number of compounds including osmoprotectants such as proline and GB are used with exogenous application to plants to reduce the harmful effects of abiotic stresses including drought stress. GB, a quaternary ammonium substance, is an osmoprotectants that can effectively scavenge ROS in plant tissues [35,36], and improves the photosynthetic rate by maintaining the Rubisco ultra-structure [17]. It is present in different amounts in plant parts including seed, stem, root and flowers [37]. During the early juvenile stage of plant, it is present in small amounts in the roots but later increases in leaves [38]. Different levels of GB can be observed in different plant species under different abiotic stresses depending on plant species, genotype, development stage, application modes and different stress conditions [39]. GB plays an essential role to provide protection from high accumulation of ROS species in plants under water shortage [40] and increases the photosynthetic defensive mechanism [29]. Rapid change in cellular metabolism, inferior level of water potential and ABA recognition sites give rise to accumulation of GB under water stress [17]. Furthermore, exogenously applied GB enhances yield and tolerance level by increasing chlorophyll contents, stimulating antioxidant defensive system, decreasing ROS and stabilizing the photosynthesis ability of photosystem II under drought stress [36]. The application of sugar beet extract also resulted in improvement in drought stress tolerance in okra plants through maintenance of ionic homeostasis which contributed to the better photosynthetic activity and yield attributes [32]. Similarly, improvement in growth and biochemical parameters of drought-stressed pea plants was recorded in response to sugar beet extract application [33]. Interestingly, economically important cereal crops such as wheat, rice, barley and maize do not synthesize or retain GB naturally. As a way forward, exogenous application of sugar beet extract can be tested on major cereal crops to study its effects in abiotic stress tolerance particularly osmotic stress [32]. Moreover, various transgenic plants over-expressing GB biosynthetic genes and enhanced retention also exhibited drought and salinity tolerance (Table 2).

2.2. Moringa oleifera—Source of Vitamins and Nutrients

Moringa, belonging to Moringaceae, is known as the “miracle tree” that has versatile uses in both animals and plants. The extract from Moringa oliefera serves as a cheap, eco-friendly, novel biostimulator, and bioenhancer that increases sustainable agriculture and crop production [65]. Moringa contains several essential components such as mineral nutrients, phytohormones (e.g., auxins, gibberellins, and cytokinins), vitamins, flavanols, phenols, sterols, and tannins, as well as several phytochemicals that make it highly beneficial for plants. It induces seed germination, plant growth, photosynthesis, and yields traits at a low cost. It also increases flowering, improves floral traits, fruiting, post-harvesting, and product quality of the fruit, and decreases senescence [66]. Plants are a rich source of different vitamins (carotenoids, B vitamins, ascorbic acid, tocopherols and quinines) that regulate biochemical and physiological processes and contribute to plant development and determine productivity. The effect of exogenously applied vitamins and nutrients in the induction of abiotic stress tolerance in plants is presented in Table 3. The M. oleifera Lam. is a tree found worldwide and is considered as bioregulator as it is a rich source of ascorbic acid, K+, Ca2+, Fe2+, riboflavin, carotenoids, phenolics and hormones including zeatin [67].
Exogenous application of M. oleifera extract improved seed germination and seedling establishment under normal and stress conditions [77]. Improvement in chlorophyll, activities of antioxidant enzymes and recovery in yield attributes of salinity stressed wheat are reported in response to M. oleifera extract application. Salinity tolerance in bean plants was also improved in response to foliar-applied extract of M. oleifera [65]. Another study reported that seed priming with M. oleifera extract mediated improvement in the germination and growth attributes of rangeland grasses such as Cenchrus ciliaris, Echinochloacrus-galli and Panicum antidotale [78]. The foliar application of M. oleifera extract mitigated cadmium toxicity in bean plants [79] and Saccharomyces cerevisiae [80]. Field trials are lacking which should be focus on future studies as M. oleifera extract could serve as a natural, cheap and green source of nutrients and vitamins that can be exploited to modulate crop growth and stress responses. M. oleifera roots, leaves, flowers, fruit, pods, and seeds have high nutrient values because it is rich in essential phytochemicals, e.g., minerals, vitamins, nicotinic acid, riboflavin, pyridoxine, β-carotene, flavonoids, glycosylates, phenolic acids, terpenoids, sterols, alkaloids, and fatty acids [79]. Therefore, it is used as herbal medicine and is known as a panacea. Moringa leaf extract has high nutrient and antioxidant value and is used as a therapeutic agent [80]. It serves as a potent antioxidant, as well as anti-inflammatory, anticancer, antimicrobial, antitumor, antitrypanosomal (control sleeping sickness), antiviral, antileishmanial, antidiabetic, antihypertension, and antispasmodic bioactive compounds [78]. Recently, Moringa seeds have been significantly characterized as having seed oil potential. Moringa seed extract is used against dyspepsia, heart disease, and eye diseases. Moringa seeds have strong antifungal activity against a zoophilic dermatophyte [81]. M. oleifera seeds contained active coagulant and antimicrobial agents, and this could be utilized for water purification as a viable replacement of proprietary chemicals such as alum sulfate [66]. Only in a few cases has an in vitro culture technique been used to promote the production of antioxidant compounds in moringa cells. Indeed, in recent decades, in vitro growth has been widely proposed as a means for inducing plant secondary metabolism, especially under stimulation by elicitors and stress conditions [65,66].

2.3. Citrus sinensis—Source of Ascorbic Acid

Ascorbic acid (AsA), also referred to as vitamin C, is a major nonenzymatic antioxidant in plants and plays an important role in alleviating certain oxidative stresses caused by biotic and abiotic stress [82,83]. AsA can enhance the growth of a plant and boost its capacity to withstand stress [84,85,86]. Moreover, AsA is the first line of plant defense against oxidative stress by removing a number of free radicals, such as O2•–, HO, and H2O2, mostly as a substrate of APX, an essential enzyme of the ascorbate–glutathione pathway [17,54,55]. Ascorbate is a cofactor for several cellular enzymes, such as violaxanthin de-epoxidase, which is essential for photoprotection by xanthophyll cycle and other enzymes and is directly involved in the removal of ROS, and the addition of exogenous AsA will inhibit lipid peroxidation and decrease malondialdehyde (MDA) content in plant tissues, thus improving the antioxidant ability of plant tissues [71,83,87,88]. The effect of ascorbic acid on improving the salinity tolerance of potatoes was studied by Sajid and Aftab [89]. They noted that activity of most antioxidant enzymes, such as SOD, POD, CAT and APX, increased significantly under NaCl stress conditions after exogenous application of ascorbic acid, thereby improving plant survival under environmental stresses. Younis et al. [90] also stated that a marked and statistically significant increase in the percentage resistance to salt stress and growth of Vicia faba seedlings was caused by the exogenous addition of 4 mM ascorbic acid with NaCl to the stressful media during experimentation (12 days). Aly et al. [91] observed that addition of 1 mM of ascorbic acid to Egyptian clover (Trifolium alexandrinum L.) seedlings grown in NaCl medium significantly increased seeds germination, carotenoids and chlorophyll and the dry mass of seedlings grown in NaCl medium.
Being a cofactor of various enzymes involved in phytohormone-dependent signaling cascades [92,93], it acts as a signaling molecule in various cellular and sub-cellular processes [94]. It can efficiently quench reactive oxygen species and thereby protect membrane structures and vital bio-molecules from oxidative stress [95]. The diverse involvement of ascorbic acid in the regulation of plant growth, physio-biochemical responses, flowering and most importantly stress sensing, signalling and regulation of ascorbate-glutathione cycle is well documented [96]. Sweet oranges are cultivated as the largest citrus fruit, and its global cultivation produces about 70% of total annual citrus yield [97]. The cultivation and production of oranges in Pakistan is ranked amongst the top suppliers. Sweet oranges are borne on a small flowering evergreen tree (7.5 to 15 m height) from the Rutaceae or citrus family and are rich source of vitamin C, and contain trace quantities of other vitamins and minerals including Ca, K, Mg, folate, thiamin and niacin [98]. Its juice is a good source of vitamin C, folate and polyphenols. The exogenous application of vitamin C improves stress tolerance among plants via regulation of cell expansion, ion transport, phytohormone signaling and reactive free radicals [71,99]. The use of Citrus sinensis extracts could potentially be an eco-friendly approach to induce multi-stress tolerance in plants and future studies should investigate its involvement and efficacy to regulate crop responses.

2.4. Melia azedarach—Source of Terpenoids

Melia azedarach is a deciduous tree of the Melia genus, which also commonly known as the purple flower tree, forest tree, and golden Lingzi. It is a fast-growing and high-quality timber tree; it is also a good nectar plant and a vital plant pesticide [100]. The timber, which resembles mahogany, is used to manufacture agricultural implements, furniture, plywood, etc. Melia azedarach is also of value for the health care and pharmaceutical industries, an effective composition due to its analgesic, anticancer, antiviral, antimalarial, antibacterial, antifeedant, and antifertility activity [101]. Furthermore, it is an important afforestation tree species, as are the surrounding greening tree species. Melia azedarach is widely distributed. It is native to tropical Asia and has been introduced to the Philippines, United States of America, Brazil, Argentina, African and Arab countries [100]. In China, it is concentrated in the south and southwest, with a relatively concentrated distribution in the east and central regions, and a marginal distribution area in the north, southwest, and southern Shanxi and Gansu [102]. For this reason, Melia azedarach, as a tree native to China, has diverse provenances [103].
Various naturally occurring secondary metabolites including terpenoids play developmental and regulatory roles among plants. Terpenoids are derived from isoprene units and such compounds serve as pigment molecules, vitamins, hormones and non-enzymatic antioxidants [104]. The diverse involvement of terpenoids in plant physio-biochemical functioning and regulation of stress tolerance is documented (Table 4). The M. azedarach (Persian lilac or Chinaberry) is a deciduous tree from Meliaceae family is rich in terpenoids [100]. Different plant parts including fruit, root, bark, stem and leaf contain diverse chemical compounds such as azedarachins, trichillins, limonoids and meliacarpns. It is widely distributed in sub-continent countries including Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and exhibit excellent medicinal properties [103]. Certain phenolic compounds also contribute to higher antioxidant activity of Melia [105]. Extracts of M. azedarach fruit were effective in controlling chickpea blight. Similarly, a pathogenic fungus, Sclerotium rolfsii was found to be controlled by the application of Melia extract [106]. Antifungal and antibacterial properties of the M. azedarach extract on pathogenic fungal species including Fusarium oxysporum, Fusarium solani, Fusarium sambucinum, Fusarium oxysporum, Alternaria alternate, Botrytis cinerea and bacteria including Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis were prominent [107]. The application of M. azedarach leaf extract was reported to enhance salinity tolerance of pea plants [108]. The inhibitory effects of M. azedarach extracts were also recorded on germination and biochemical traits of radish [107] and future studies should investigate the crop-specific effect of M. azedarach extracts to potentiate its applications at larger agricultural scale.

2.5. Azadirachta indica—Source of Secondary Metabolites

About 135 compounds have been isolated from different parts of the Azadirachta indica (neem tree), and several reviews are available on the chemistry and structural diversity of these compounds [106]. As an ecologically friendly option, the formulation of biopesticides derived from the A. indica has been gaining interest. The main secondary metabolites responsible for the pesticide or antifeedant effecting A. indica are limonoids, or tetranortriterpenoids, azadirachtin being the most active compound [126]. A. indica cell culture is seen as an interesting alternate for the production of these secondary metabolites. In particular, stirred-tank bioreactors have been used for this purpose, although other reactor systems have been employed [127]. Additionally, shake flasks play an important role in the preparation of inoculum. However, the hydrodynamic environment resulting from the agitation speed and the bioreactor configuration affects the plant cell growth and the metabolite yield in stirred-tank bioreactors [106]. Therefore, it is important to establish the relationship between the operating conditions of the bioreactor and culture response under hydrodynamic stress. The compounds have been categorized into two major classes such as isoprenoids and non-isoprenoids and exhibit incredible antifungal [128], antiviral [129], anticancer [130], antibacterial [131] and antioxidant properties [132]. Due to the presence of diverse secondary metabolites, neem extract application could induce biotic stress tolerance among plants against multiple pathogenic species.
Control of black scurf fungal disease in potato thorough exogenous neem extract is reported [133]. Neem extract mediated induction of biotic stress tolerance in pea plants against powdery mildew was linked with increased phenylalanine ammonia-lyase activity [127]. A recent study linked application of neem fruit extracts induced systemic acquired resistance in tomato plants against Pseudomonas syringae through increased activity of polyphenol oxidase enzyme [134]. Consistent with earlier reports, the application of neem and tulsi extracts reduced the severity of early blight of tomato through improvement in chlorophyll contents and increased antioxidant enzyme activities [135]. The use of neem extract suggested for management aphid attack on wheat [136] and corm-rot disease of Gladiolus [137] to prevent crop loss in Pakistan. Other than biotic stress, application of neem aqueous extracts improved growth and pigments which contributed improved photosynthesis in algae, Nostoc muscorum [138]. It is reported that neem extract reduced MDA contents and mitigated oxidative stress [138,139]. Based on the available literature, the application of neem extracts to crops can promote stress tolerance especially in response to pathogenic attack.

3. Conclusions

Phytoextracts containing biostimulants can be used as fertilizers to maintain the quality of crops by providing them with the essential metabolites and nutrients. Most importantly, these are cheaper, affordable and easily available for smallholder farmers compared to the synthetic products. The plant-extracts from C. sinensis, M. oleifera and B. vulgaris can be used to induce biotic and abiotic stress tolerance in plants as a cost-effective and environmentally friendly strategy to improve crop productivity. Still there are gaps and efforts regarding the direct application of plant-extracts on different crops as nutrients and/or biostimulants are limited and required more investigations. Plants such as A. indica and M. azedarach are naturally enriched with several terpenes and iso-terpenes (which can be obtained in extracts) that show significant insecticidal and pesticidal activity making them potentially eco-friendly alternatives over synthetic pesticides. As a future research prospect, field trials should investigate its efficacy against different insects, pests and microbial crop pathogens. In short, the undue use of synthetic compounds on our food and forage crops must be discouraged, and modern farmers and growers should follow sustainable practices.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data. All authors have reviewed the final version of the manuscript and approved it for publication.

Funding

The APC was funded by the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

Glycinebetaine (GB), reactive oxygen species (ROS), ascorbic acid (AsA), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), hydroxyl radical (HO), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), sodium chloride (NaCl), calcium (Ca), potassium (K), magnesium (Mg).

References

  1. Lemaire, G.; Belanger, G. Allometries in plants as drivers of forage nutritive value: A review. Agriculture 2020, 10, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Merrington, G. The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: Copper and Arsenic in Soils. In Soil Health: The Foundation of Sustainable Agriculture; Wollongbar Agricultural Institute: Wollongbar, Australia, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  3. Mahmood, N.; Arshad, M.; Kaechele, H.; Shahzad, M.F.; Ullah, A.; Mueller, K. Fatalism, Climate Resiliency Training and Farmers’ Adaptation Responses: Implications for Sustainable Rainfed-Wheat Production in Pakistan. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Sarraf, M.; Vishwakarma, K.; Kumar, V.; Arif, N.; Das, S.; Johnson, R.; Janeeshma, E.; Puthur, J.T.; Aliniaeifard, S.; Chauhan, D.K.; et al. Metal/Metalloid-Based Nanomaterials for Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance: An Overview of the Mechanisms. Plants 2022, 11, 316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Jeyabharathi, S.; Kalishwaralal, K.; Sundar, K.; Muthukumaran, A. Synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnONPs) by aqueous extract of Amaranthus caudatus and evaluation of their toxicity and antimicrobial activity. Mater. Lett. 2017, 209, 295–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ben Mrid, R.; Benmrid, B.; Hafsa, J.; Boukcim, H.; Sobeh, M.; Yasri, A. Secondary metabolites as biostimulant and bioprotectant agents: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 777, 146204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Iqbal, S.; Khan, H.Z.; Shaheen, H. Growth and yield responses of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) to different levels of phosphorus application under different tillage systems. Int. J. Agric. Appl. Sci. 2016, 4, 22–27. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ghani, M.A.; Abbas, M.M.; Ali, B.; Aziz, R.; Qadri, R.W.K.; Noor, A.; Azam, M.; Bahzad, S.; Saleem, M.H.; Abualreesh, M.H.; et al. Alleviating Role of Gibberellic Acid in Enhancing Plant Growth and Stimulating Phenolic Compounds in Carrot (Daucus carota L.) under Lead Stress. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Saleem, M.H.; Rizwan, M.; Shah, Z.-U.H.; Depar, N.; Usman, K. Chromium toxicity in plants: Consequences on growth, chromosomal behaviour and mineral nutrient status. Turk. J. Agric. For. 2022, 46, 371–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mfarrej, M.; Wang, X.; Hamzah Saleem, M.; Hussain, I.; Rasheed, R.; Arslan Ashraf, M.; Iqbal, M.; Sohaib Chattha, M.; Nasser Alyemeni, M. Hydrogen sulphide and nitric oxide mitigate the negative impacts of waterlogging stress on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Biol. 2021, 24, 670–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ma, J.; Saleem, M.H.; Ali, B.; Rasheed, R.; Ashraf, M.A.; Aziz, H.; Ercisli, S.; Riaz, S.; Elsharkawy, M.M.; Hussain, I.; et al. Impact of foliar application of syringic acid on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) under heavy metal stress-insights into nutrient uptake, redox homeostasis, oxidative stress, and antioxidant defense. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 950120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kour, J.; Kohli, S.K.; Khanna, K.; Bakshi, P.; Sharma, P.; Singh, A.D.; Ibrahim, M.; Devi, K.; Sharma, N.; Ohri, P.; et al. Brassinosteroid Signaling, Crosstalk and, Physiological Functions in Plants Under Heavy Metal Stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 608061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Javed, M.T.; Saleem, M.H.; Aslam, S.; Rehman, M.; Iqbal, N.; Begum, R.; Ali, S.; Alsahli, A.A.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Wijaya, L. Elucidating silicon-mediated distinct morpho-physio-biochemical attributes and organic acid exudation patterns of cadmium stressed Ajwain (Trachyspermum ammi L.). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 157, 23–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Saini, S.; Kaur, N.; Pati, P.K. Phytohormones: Key players in the modulation of heavy metal stress tolerance in plants. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 223, 112578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ghafar, M.A.; Akram, N.A.; Saleem, M.H.; Wang, J.; Wijaya, L.; Alyemeni, M.N. Ecotypic Morphological and Physio-Biochemical Responses of Two Differentially Adapted Forage Grasses, Cenchrus ciliaris L. and Cyperus arenarius Retz. to Drought Stress. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kaya, C.; Şenbayram, M.; Akram, N.A.; Ashraf, M.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Ahmad, P. Sulfur-enriched leonardite and humic acid soil amendments enhance tolerance to drought and phosphorus deficiency stress in maize (Zea mays L.). Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 6432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Sarwar, S.; Akram, N.A.; Saleem, M.H.; Zafar, S.; Alghanem, S.M.; Abualreesh, M.H.; Alatawi, A.; Ali, S. Spatial variations in the biochemical potential of okra [Abelmoschus esculentus L. (Moench)] leaf and fruit under field conditions. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0259520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sadiq, M.; Akram, N.A.; Ashraf, M.; Al-Qurainy, F.; Ahmad, P. Alpha-tocopherol-induced regulation of growth and metabolism in plants under non-stress and stress conditions. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2019, 38, 1325–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Adrees, M.; Ali, S.; Rizwan, M.; Zia-ur-Rehman, M.; Ibrahim, M.; Abbas, F.; Farid, M.; Qayyum, M.F.; Irshad, M.K. Mechanisms of silicon-mediated alleviation of heavy metal toxicity in plants: A review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015, 119, 186–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rehman, M.; Saleem, M.H.; Fahad, S.; Bashir, S.; Peng, D.; Deng, G.; Alamri, S.; Siddiqui, M.H.; Khan, S.M.; Shah, R.A. Effects of rice straw biochar and nitrogen fertilizer on ramie (Boehmeria nivea L.) morpho-physiological traits, copper uptake and post-harvest soil characteristics, grown in an aged-copper contaminated soil. J. Plant Nutr. 2021, 45, 11–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ahmad, K.; Aslam, M.; Saleem, M.H.; Ijaz, M.; Ul-Allah, S.; El-Sheikh, A.H.M.A.; Adnan, M.; Ali, S. Genetic Diversity and Characterization of Salt Stress Tolerance Traits in Maize (Zea mays L.) Under Normal And Saline Conditions. Pak. J. Bot. 2022, 54, 759–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zaheer, I.E.; Ali, S.; Saleem, M.H.; Arslan Ashraf, M.; Ali, Q.; Abbas, Z.; Rizwan, M.; El-Sheikh, M.A.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Wijaya, L. Zinc-lysine Supplementation Mitigates Oxidative Stress in Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) by Preventing Phytotoxicity of Chromium, When Irrigated with Tannery Wastewater. Plants 2020, 9, 1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ali, M.; Wang, X.; Haroon, U.; Chaudhary, H.J.; Kamal, A.; Ali, Q.; Saleem, M.H.; Usman, K.; Alatawi, A.; Ali, S.; et al. Antifungal activity of Zinc nitrate derived nano Zno fungicide synthesized from Trachyspermum ammi to control fruit rot disease of grapefruit. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022, 233, 113311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Latique, S.; Mrid, R.B.; Kabach, I.; Kchikich, A.; Sammama, H.; Yasri, A.; Nhiri, M.; El Kaoua, M.; Douira, A.; Selmaoui, K. Foliar Application of Ulva rigida Water Extracts Improves Salinity Tolerance in Wheat (Triticum durum L.). Agronomy 2021, 11, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ali, Q.; Ahmar, S.; Sohail, M.A.; Kamran, M.; Ali, M.; Saleem, M.H.; Rizwan, M.; Ahmed, A.M.; Mora-Poblete, F.; do Amaral Júnior, A.T. Research advances and applications of biosensing technology for the diagnosis of pathogens in sustainable agriculture. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 9002–9019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Sheoran, V.; Sheoran, A.S.; Poonia, P. Factors affecting phytoextraction: A review. Pedosphere 2016, 26, 148–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bouchmaa, N.; Mrid, R.B.; Kabach, I.; Zouaoui, Z.; Karrouchi, K.; Chtibi, H.; Zyad, A.; Cacciola, F.; Nhiri, M. Beta vulgaris subsp. maritima: A Valuable Food with High Added Health Benefits. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yolcu, S.; Alavilli, H.; Ganesh, P.; Asif, M.; Kumar, M.; Song, K. An Insight into the Abiotic Stress Responses of Cultivated Beets (Beta vulgaris L.). Plants 2022, 11, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nazar, Z.; Akram, N.A.; Saleem, M.H.; Ashraf, M.; Ahmed, S.; Ali, S.; Abdullah Alsahli, A.; Alyemeni, M.N. Glycinebetaine-Induced Alteration in Gaseous Exchange Capacity and Osmoprotective Phenomena in Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under Water Deficit Conditions. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gou, W.; Tian, L.; Ruan, Z.; Zheng, P.; Chen, F.; Zhang, L.; Cui, Z.; Zheng, P.; Li, Z.; Gao, M. Accumulation of choline and glycinebetaine and drought stress tolerance induced in maize (Zea mays) by three plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) strains. Pak. J. Bot. 2015, 47, 581–586. [Google Scholar]
  31. Yolcu, S.; Alavilli, H.; Ganesh, P.; Panigrahy, M.; Song, K. Salt and drought stress responses in cultivated beets (Beta vulgaris L.) and wild beet (Beta maritima L.). Plants 2021, 10, 1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Romano, A.; Sorgona, A.; Lupini, A.; Araniti, F.; Stevanato, P.; Cacco, G.; Abenavoli, M.R. Morpho-physiological responses of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) genotypes to drought stress. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2013, 35, 853–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Moosavi, S.G.R.; Ramazani, S.H.R.; Hemayati, S.S.; Gholizade, H. Effect of drought stress on root yield and some morpho-physiological traits in different genotypes of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 2017, 20, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mäck, G.; Hoffmann, C.M.; Märländer, B. Nitrogen compounds in organs of two sugar beet genotypes (Beta vulgaris L.) during the season. Field Crops Res. 2007, 102, 210–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ashraf, M.; Foolad, M.; Ashraf, M.; Foolad, M. Improving plant abiotic-stress resistance by exogenous application of osmoprotectants glycine, betaine and proline. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2007, 59, 206–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ali, S.; Chaudhary, A.; Rizwan, M.; Anwar, H.T.; Adrees, M.; Farid, M.; Irshad, M.K.; Hayat, T.; Anjum, S.A. Alleviation of chromium toxicity by glycinebetaine is related to elevated antioxidant enzymes and suppressed chromium uptake and oxidative stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 10669–10678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. You, L.; Song, Q.; Wu, Y.; Li, S.; Jiang, C.; Chang, L.; Yang, X.; Zhang, J. Accumulation of glycine betaine in transplastomic potato plants expressing choline oxidase confers improved drought tolerance. Planta 2019, 249, 1963–1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Maqsood, A.; Shahbaz, M.; Akram, N.A. Influence of Exogenously Applied Glycinebetaine on Growth and Gas Exchange Characteristics of Maize (Zea mays L.). Pak. J. Agric. Sci. 2006, 43, 36–41. [Google Scholar]
  39. Wang, G.; Li, F.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, M.; Hui, Z.; Wang, W. Overaccumulation of glycine betaine enhances tolerance of the photosynthetic apparatus to drought and heat stress in wheat. Photosynthetica 2010, 48, 30–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ma, X.; Wang, Y.; Xie, S.; Wang, C.; Wang, W. Glycinebetaine application ameliorates negative effects of drought stress in tobacco. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2007, 54, 472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Habib, N.; Ashraf, M.; Ali, Q.; Perveen, R. Response of salt stressed okra (Abelmoschus esculentus Moench) plants to foliar-applied glycine betaine and glycine betaine containing sugarbeet extract. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2012, 83, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Raza, S.H.; Athar, H.R.; Ashraf, M.; Hameed, A. Glycinebetaine-induced modulation of antioxidant enzymes activities and ion accumulation in two wheat cultivars differing in salt tolerance. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2007, 60, 368–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Iqbal, N.; Ashraf, M.; Ashraf, M. Glycinebetaine, an osmolyte of interest to improve water stress tolerance in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.): Water relations and yield. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2008, 74, 274–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Ali, Q.; Ashraf, M. Induction of drought tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.) due to exogenous application of trehalose: Growth, photosynthesis, water relations and oxidative defence mechanism. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2011, 197, 258–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Shahbaz, M.; Masood, Y.; Perveen, S.; Ashraf, M. Is foliar-applied glycinebetaine effective in mitigating the adverse effects of drought stress on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)? J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual. 2012, 84, 192. [Google Scholar]
  46. Manaf, H.H. Beneficial effects of exogenous selenium, glycine betaine and seaweed extract on salt stressed cowpea plant. Ann. Agric. Sci. 2016, 61, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Tisarum, R.; Theerawitaya, C.; Samphumphung, T.; Takabe, T.; Cha-um, S. Exogenous foliar application of glycine betaine to alleviate water deficit tolerance in two Indica rice genotypes under greenhouse conditions. Agronomy 2019, 9, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Cha-um, S.; Samphumphuang, T.; Kirdmanee, C. Glycinebetaine alleviates water deficit stress in indica rice using proline accumulation, photosynthetic efficiencies, growth performances and yield attributes. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2013, 7, 213–218. [Google Scholar]
  49. Khan, S.U.; Khan, A.; Naveed, S. Effect of exogenously applied kinetin and glycinebetaine on metabolic and yield attributes of rice (Oryza sativa L.) under drought stress. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2015, 27, 75–81. [Google Scholar]
  50. Cruz, F.; Castro, G.; Silva Júnior, D.; Festucci-Buselli, R.; Pinheiro, H. Exogenous glycine betaine modulates ascorbate peroxidase and catalase activities and prevent lipid peroxidation in mild water-stressed Carapa guianensis plants. Photosynthetica 2013, 51, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gupta, N.; Thind, S.K. Grain yield response of drought stressed wheat to foliar application of glycine betaine. Indian J. Agric. Res. 2017, 51, 287–291. [Google Scholar]
  52. Osman, H.S. Enhancing antioxidant–yield relationship of pea plant under drought at different growth stages by exogenously applied glycine betaine and proline. Ann. Agric. Sci. 2015, 60, 389–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Sakamoto, A.; Valverde, R.; Chen, T.H.; Murata, N. Transformation of Arabidopsis with the codA gene for choline oxidase enhances freezing tolerance of plants. Plant J. 2000, 22, 449–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Sulpice, R.; Tsukaya, H.; Nonaka, H.; Mustardy, L.; Chen, T.H.; Murata, N. Enhanced formation of flowers in salt-stressed Arabidopsis after genetic engineering of the synthesis of glycine betaine. Plant J. 2003, 36, 165–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Shen, Y.-G.; Du, B.-X.; Zhang, W.-K.; Zhang, J.-S.; Chen, S.-Y. AhCMO, regulated by stresses in Atriplex hortensis, can improve drought tolerance in transgenic tobacco. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2002, 105, 815–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Park, E.J.; Jeknić, Z.; Sakamoto, A.; DeNoma, J.; Yuwansiri, R.; Murata, N.; Chen, T.H. Genetic engineering of glycinebetaine synthesis in tomato protects seeds, plants, and flowers from chilling damage. Plant J. 2004, 40, 474–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Goel, D.; Singh, A.K.; Yadav, V.; Babbar, S.B.; Murata, N.; Bansal, K.C. Transformation of tomato with a bacterial codA gene enhances tolerance to salt and water stresses. J. Plant Physiol. 2011, 168, 1286–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Quan, R.; Shang, M.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, J. Improved chilling tolerance by transformation with betA gene for the enhancement of glycinebetaine synthesis in maize. Plant Sci. 2004, 166, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Su, J.; Hirji, R.; Zhang, L.; He, C.; Selvaraj, G.; Wu, R. Evaluation of the stress-inducible production of choline oxidase in transgenic rice as a strategy for producing the stress-protectant glycine betaine. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 1129–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Ahmad, R.; Kim, M.D.; Back, K.-H.; Kim, H.-S.; Lee, H.-S.; Kwon, S.-Y.; Murata, N.; Chung, W.-I.; Kwak, S.-S. Stress-induced expression of choline oxidase in potato plant chloroplasts confers enhanced tolerance to oxidative, salt, and drought stresses. Plant Cell Rep. 2008, 27, 687–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kathuria, H.; Giri, J.; Nataraja, K.N.; Murata, N.; Udayakumar, M.; Tyagi, A.K. Glycinebetaine-induced water-stress tolerance in codA-expressing transgenic indica rice is associated with up-regulation of several stress responsive genes. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2009, 7, 512–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Li, D.; Zhang, T.; Wang, M.; Liu, Y.; Brestic, M.; Chen, T.H.; Yang, X. Genetic engineering of the biosynthesis of glycine betaine modulates phosphate homeostasis by regulating phosphate acquisition in tomato. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 9, 1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Wei, D.; Zhang, W.; Wang, C.; Meng, Q.; Li, G.; Chen, T.H.; Yang, X. Genetic engineering of the biosynthesis of glycinebetaine leads to alleviate salt-induced potassium efflux and enhances salt tolerance in tomato plants. Plant Sci. 2017, 257, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Zhang, J.; Tan, W.; Yang, X.-H.; Zhang, H.-X. Plastid-expressed choline monooxygenase gene improves salt and drought tolerance through accumulation of glycine betaine in tobacco. Plant Cell Rep. 2008, 27, 1113–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Salaheldeen, M.; Aroua, M.K.; Mariod, A.; Cheng, S.F.; Abdelrahman, M.A.; Atabani, A. Physicochemical characterization and thermal behavior of biodiesel and biodiesel–diesel blends derived from crude Moringa peregrina seed oil. Energy Convers. Manag. 2015, 92, 535–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Hussein, M.; Abou-Baker, N.H. Growth and mineral status of moringa plants as affected by silicate and salicylic acid under salt stress. Int. J. Plant Soil Sci. 2013, 3, 163–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Mahmood, K.T.; Mugal, T.; Haq, I.U. Moringa oleifera: A natural gift-A review. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2010, 2, 775. [Google Scholar]
  68. Kaya, C.; Ashraf, M.; Sonmez, O.; Tuna, A.L.; Polat, T.; Aydemir, S. Exogenous application of thiamin promotes growth and antioxidative defense system at initial phases of development in salt-stressed plants of two maize cultivars differing in salinity tolerance. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2015, 37, 1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ejaz, B.; Sajid, Z.A.; Aftab, F. Effect of exogenous application of ascorbic acid on antioxidant enzyme activities, proline contents, and growth parameters of Saccharum spp. hybrid cv. HSF-240 under salt stress. Turk. J. Biol. 2012, 36, 630–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Malik, S.; Ashraf, M. Exogenous application of ascorbic acid stimulates growth and photosynthesis of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under drought. Soil Environ. 2012, 31, 72–77. [Google Scholar]
  71. Aziz, A.; Akram, N.A.; Ashraf, M. Influence of natural and synthetic vitamin C (ascorbic acid) on primary and secondary metabolites and associated metabolism in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) plants under water deficit regimes. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 123, 192–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Sayed, S.; Gadallah, M. Effects of shoot and root application of thiamin on salt-stressed sunflower plants. Plant Growth Regul. 2002, 36, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. GHAFFAR, A.; Akram, N.A.; Ashraf, M.; ASHRAF, Y.; Sadiq, M. Thiamin-induced variations in oxidative defense processes in white clover (Trifolium repens L.) under water deficit stress. Turk. J. Bot. 2019, 43, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Semida, W.; Taha, R.; Abdelhamid, M.; Rady, M. Foliar-applied α-tocopherol enhances salt-tolerance in Vicia faba L. plants grown under saline conditions. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2014, 95, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Sadiq, M.; Akram, N.A.; Javed, M.T. Alpha-tocopherol alters endogenous oxidative defense system in mung bean plants under water-deficit conditions. Pak. J. Bot. 2016, 48, 2177–2182. [Google Scholar]
  76. El-Bassiouny, H.; Sadak, M.S. Impact of foliar application of ascorbic acid and α-tocopherol on antioxidant activity and some biochemical aspects of flax cultivars under salinity stress. Acta Biol. Colomb. 2015, 20, 209–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Gopalakrishnan, L.; Doriya, K.; Kumar, D.S. Moringa oleifera: A review on nutritive importance and its medicinal application. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2016, 5, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Stohs, S.J.; Hartman, M.J. Review of the safety and efficacy of Moringa oleifera. Phytother. Res. 2015, 29, 796–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Howladar, S.M. A novel Moringa oleifera leaf extract can mitigate the stress effects of salinity and cadmium in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2014, 100, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kerdsomboon, K.; Tatip, S.; Kosasih, S.; Auesukaree, C. Soluble Moringa oleifera leaf extract reduces intracellular cadmium accumulation and oxidative stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2016, 121, 543–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Fahey, J.W. Moringa oleifera: A review of the medical evidence for its nutritional, therapeutic, and prophylactic properties. Part 1. Trees Life J. 2005, 1, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  82. Khan, T.; Mazid, M.; Mohammad, F. A review of ascorbic acid potentialities against oxidative stress induced in plants. J. Agrobiol. 2011, 28, 97–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Sharma, R.; Bhardwaj, R.; Thukral, A.K.; Al-Huqail, A.A.; Siddiqui, M.H.; Ahmad, P. Oxidative stress mitigation and initiation of antioxidant and osmoprotectant responses mediated by ascorbic acid in Brassica juncea L. subjected to copper (II) stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 182, 109436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Fatima, A.; Singh, A.A.; Mukherjee, A.; Agrawal, M.; Agrawal, S.B. Ascorbic acid and thiols as potential biomarkers of ozone tolerance in tropical wheat cultivars. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 171, 701–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Ullah, H.A.; Javed, F.; Wahid, A.; Sadia, B. Alleviating effect of exogenous application of ascorbic acid on growth and mineral nutrients in cadmium stressed barley (Hordeum vulgare) seedlings. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2016, 18, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ma, J.; Saleem, M.H.; Yasin, G.; Mumtaz, S.; Qureshi, F.F.; Ali, B.; Ercisli, S.; Alhag, S.K.; Ahmed, A.E.; Vodnar, D.C.; et al. Individual and combinatorial effects of SNP and NaHS on morpho-physio-biochemical attributes and phytoextraction of chromium through Cr-stressed spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 973740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Saleem, M.H.; Mfarrej, M.F.B.; Alatawi, A.; Mumtaz, S.; Imran, M.; Ashraf, M.A.; Rizwan, M.; Usman, K.; Ahmad, P.; Ali, S. Silicon Enhances Morpho–Physio–Biochemical Responses in Arsenic Stressed Spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) by Minimizing Its Uptake. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Saleem, M.H.; Wang, X.; Ali, S.; Zafar, S.; Nawaz, M.; Adnan, M.; Fahad, S.; Shah, A.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Hefft, D.I.; et al. Interactive effects of gibberellic acid and NPK on morpho-physio-biochemical traits and organic acid exudation pattern in coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) grown in soil artificially spiked with boron. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 167, 884–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Sajid, Z.A.; Aftab, F. Amelioration of salinity tolerance in Solanum tuberosum L. by exogenous application of ascorbic acid. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant 2009, 45, 540–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Younis, M.E.; Hasaneen, M.N.; Kazamel, A.M. Exogenously applied ascorbic acid ameliorates detrimental effects of NaCl and mannitol stress in Vicia faba seedlings. Protoplasma 2010, 239, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Aly, A.A.; Khafaga, A.F.; Omar, G.N. Improvement the adverse effect of salt stress in Egyptian clover (Trifolium alexandrinum L.) by AsA application through some biochemical and RT-PCR markers. J. Appl. Phytotechnol. Environ. Sanit. 2012, 1, 91–102. [Google Scholar]
  92. Kamran, M.; Danish, M.; Saleem, M.H.; Malik, Z.; Parveen, A.; Abbasi, G.H.; Jamil, M.; Ali, S.; Afzal, S.; Riaz, M. Application of abscisic acid and 6-benzylaminopurine modulated morpho-physiological and antioxidative defense responses of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) by minimizing cobalt uptake. Chemosphere 2020, 263, 128169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Nawaz, M.; Wang, X.; Saleem, M.H.; Khan, M.H.U.; Afzal, J.; Fiaz, S.; Ali, S.; Ishaq, H.; Khan, A.H.; Rehman, N.; et al. Deciphering Plantago ovata Forsk Leaf Extract Mediated Distinct Germination, Growth and Physio-Biochemical Improvements under Water Stress in Maize (Zea mays L.) at Early Growth Stage. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Dolatabadian, A.; Jouneghani, R.S. Impact of exogenous ascorbic acid on antioxidant activity and some physiological traits of common bean subjected to salinity stress. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca 2009, 37, 165–172. [Google Scholar]
  95. Hassan, A.; Amjad, S.F.; Saleem, M.H.; Yasmin, H.; Imran, M.; Riaz, M.; Ali, Q.; Joyia, F.A.; Ahmed, S.; Ali, S. Foliar application of ascorbic acid enhances salinity stress tolerance in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) through modulation of morpho-physio-biochemical attributes, ions uptake, osmo-protectants and stress response genes expression. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 4276–4290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Akram, N.A.; Shafiq, F.; Ashraf, M. Ascorbic acid-a potential oxidant scavenger and its role in plant development and abiotic stress tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Favela-Hernández, J.M.J.; González-Santiago, O.; Ramírez-Cabrera, M.A.; Esquivel-Ferriño, P.C.; Camacho-Corona, M.d.R. Chemistry and Pharmacology of Citrus sinensis. Molecules 2016, 21, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Salem, M.; Abdel-Ghany, H.M. Effects of dietary orange peel on growth performance of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fingerlings. Aquac. Stud. 2018, 18, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Fukui, K.; Kaneuji, A.; Hirata, H.; Tsujioka, J.-I.; Shioya, A.; Yamada, S.; Kawahara, N. Bilateral spontaneous simultaneous femoral neck occult fracture in a middle-aged man due to osteoporosis and vitamin D deficiency osteomalacia: A case report and literature review. Int. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2019, 60, 358–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Al-Rubae, A.Y. The potential uses of Melia azedarach L. as pesticidal and medicinal plant, review. Am.-Eurasian J. Sustain. Agric. 2009, 3, 185–194. [Google Scholar]
  101. Han, C.; Chen, J.; Liu, Z.; Chen, H.; Yu, F.; Yu, W. Morphological and Physiological Responses of Melia azedarach Seedlings of Different Provenances to Drought Stress. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Rana, A. Melia azedarach: A phytopharmacological review. Pharmacogn. Rev. 2008, 2, 173–179. [Google Scholar]
  103. Sultana, S.; Asif, H.M.; Akhtar, N.; Waqas, M.; Rehman, S.U. Comprehensive Review on Ethanobotanical Uses, Phytochemistry and Pharmacological Properties of Melia azedarach Linn. Asian J. Pharm. Res. Health Care 2014, 6, 26–32. [Google Scholar]
  104. Kumar, R.; Singh, R.; Meera, P.S.; Kalidhar, S. Chemical components and insecticidal properties of Bakain (Melia azedarach L.)—A review. Agric. Rev. 2003, 24, 101–115. [Google Scholar]
  105. Ervina, M. A review: Melia azedarach L. as a potent anticancer drug. Pharmacogn. Rev. 2018, 12, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Singh, B.; Pandya, D.; Mankad, A. A review on different pharmacological & biological activities of Azadirachta indica A. Jusm. and Melia azedarach L. J. Plant Sci. Res. 2020, 36, 53–59. [Google Scholar]
  107. Akacha, M.; Lahbib, K.; Daami-Remadi, M.; Boughanmi, N.G. Antibacterial, antifungal and anti-inflammatory activities of Melia azedarach ethanolic leaf extract. Bangladesh J. Pharmacol. 2016, 11, 666–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Li, N.; Shao, T.; Zhou, Y.; Cao, Y.; Hu, H.; Sun, Q.; Long, X.; Yue, Y.; Gao, X.; Rengel, Z. Effects of planting Melia azedarach L. on soil properties and microbial community in saline-alkali soil. Land Degrad. Dev. 2021, 32, 2951–2961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Klein, A.; Keyster, M.; Ludidi, N. Caffeic acid decreases salinity-induced root nodule superoxide radical accumulation and limits salinity-induced biomass reduction in soybean. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2013, 35, 3059–3066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Thind, S.; Barn, G. Caffeic acid and calcium application affects electrolyte leakage, hydrolases and cytosolute contents of heat stressed cotton seedlings. J. Cotton Res. Dev. 2012, 26, 77–80. [Google Scholar]
  111. El-Soud, W.A.; Hegab, M.M.; AbdElgawad, H.; Zinta, G.; Asard, H. Ability of ellagic acid to alleviate osmotic stress on chickpea seedlings. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 71, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Saleh, A.M.; Madany, M. Coumarin pretreatment alleviates salinity stress in wheat seedlings. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 88, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Shakoor, A.; Saleem, M.F.; Anjum, S.A.; Wahid, M.A.; Saeed, M.T. Effect of heat stress and benzoic acid as foliar application on earliness and nutrients uptake in cotton. J. Agric. Res. 2017, 55, 15–28. [Google Scholar]
  114. Noreen, S.; Ashraf, M.; Hussain, M.; Jamil, A. Exogenous application of salicylic acid enhances antioxidative capacity in salt stressed sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) plants. Pak. J. Bot. 2009, 41, 473–479. [Google Scholar]
  115. Gunes, A.; Inal, A.; Alpaslan, M.; Eraslan, F.; Bagci, E.G.; Cicek, N. Salicylic acid induced changes on some physiological parameters symptomatic for oxidative stress and mineral nutrition in maize (Zea mays L.) grown under salinity. J. Plant Physiol. 2007, 164, 728–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Rao, S.; Qayyum, A.; Razzaq, A.; Ahmad, M.; Mahmood, I.; Sher, A. Role of foliar application of salicylic acid and l-tryptophan in drought tolerance of maize. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2012, 22, 768–772. [Google Scholar]
  117. Li, Q.; Wang, G.; Wang, Y.; Yang, D.; Guan, C.; Ji, J. Foliar application of salicylic acid alleviate the cadmium toxicity by modulation the reactive oxygen species in potato. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 172, 317–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Mostofa, M.G.; Fujita, M. Salicylic acid alleviates copper toxicity in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings by up-regulating antioxidative and glyoxalase systems. Ecotoxicology 2013, 22, 959–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. El-Katony, T.M.; El-Bastawisy, Z.M.; El-Ghareeb, S.S. Timing of salicylic acid application affects the response of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids to salinity stress. Heliyon 2019, 5, e01547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Kowalska, I.; Smoleñ, S. Effect of foliar application of salicylic acid on the response of tomato plants to oxidative stress and salinity. J. Elem. 2013, 18, 239–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Husen, A.; Iqbal, M.; Sohrab, S.S.; Ansari, M.K.A. Salicylic acid alleviates salinity-caused damage to foliar functions, plant growth and antioxidant system in Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata A. Br.). Agric. Food Secur. 2018, 7, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Askari, E.; Ehsanzadeh, P. Drought stress mitigation by foliar application of salicylic acid and their interactive effects on physiological characteristics of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.) genotypes. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2015, 37, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Cheng, Z.-Y.; Sun, L.; Wang, X.-J.; Sun, R.; An, Y.-Q.; An, B.-L.; Zhu, M.-X.; Zhao, C.-F.; Bai, J.-G. Ferulic acid pretreatment alleviates heat stress in blueberry seedlings by inducing antioxidant enzymes, proline, and soluble sugars. Biol. Plant. 2018, 62, 534–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Amist, N.; Singh, N. Comparative effects of benzoic acid and water stress on wheat seedlings. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2018, 65, 709–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Quan, N.T.; Xuan, T.D. Foliar application of vanillic and p-hydroxybenzoic acids enhanced drought tolerance and formation of phytoalexin momilactones in rice. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2018, 64, 1831–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Alzohairy, M.A. Therapeutics role of Azadirachta indica (Neem) and their active constituents in diseases prevention and treatment. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2016, 2016, 7382506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  127. Hashmat, I.; Azad, H.; Ahmed, A. Neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss)—A nature’s drugstore: An overview. Int. Res. J. Biol. Sci. 2012, 1, 76–79. [Google Scholar]
  128. Neycee, M.; Nematzadeh, G.; Dehestani, A.; Alavi, M. Assessment of antifungal effects of shoot extracts in chinaberry (Melia azedarach) against 5 phytopathogenic fungi. Int. J. Agric. Crop Sci. 2012, 4, 474–477. [Google Scholar]
  129. Faccin-Galhardi, L.C.; Yamamoto, K.A.; Ray, S.; Ray, B.; Linhares, R.E.C.; Nozawa, C. The in vitro antiviral property of Azadirachta indica polysaccharides for poliovirus. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2012, 142, 86–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Paul, R.; Prasad, M.; Sah, N.K. Anticancer biology of Azadirachta indica L. (neem): A mini review. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2011, 12, 467–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Koona, S.; Budida, S. Antibacterial Potential of the Extracts of the Leaves of Azadirachta indica Linn. Not. Sci. Biol. 2011, 3, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Hossain, M.D.; Sarwar, M.S.; Dewan, S.M.R.; Hossain, M.S.; Shahid-Ud-Daula, A.; Islam, M.S. Investigation of total phenolic content and antioxidant activities of Azadirachta indica roots. Avicenna J. Phytomed. 2014, 4, 97. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  133. Khan, Z.I.; Mansha, A.; Saleem, M.H.; Tariq, F.; Ahmad, K.; Ahmad, T.; Farooq Awan, M.U.; Abualreesh, M.H.; Alatawi, A.; Ali, S. Trace Metal Accumulation in Rice Variety Kainat Irrigated with Canal Water. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Goel, N.; Paul, P.K. Polyphenol oxidase and lysozyme mediate induction of systemic resistance in tomato, when a bioelicitor is used. J. Plant Prot. Res. 2015, 55, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Dheeba, B.; Niranjana, R.; Sampathkumar, P.; Kannan, K.; Kannan, M. Efficacy of neem (Azadirachta indica) and tulsi (Ocimum sanctum) leaf extracts against early blight of tomato. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India Sect. B Biol. Sci. 2015, 85, 327–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Shah, F.M.; Razaq, M.; Ali, A.; Han, P.; Chen, J. Comparative role of neem seed extract, moringa leaf extract and imidacloprid in the management of wheat aphids in relation to yield losses in Pakistan. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0184639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Riaz, T.; Nawaz Khan, S.; Javaid, A. Management of corm-rot disease of gladiolus by plant extracts. Nat. Prod. Res. 2010, 24, 1131–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Prasad, S.M.; Dwivedi, R.; Singh, R.; Singh, M.; Singh, D. Neem Leaf Aqueous Extract Induced Growth, Pigments, and Photosynthesis Responses of Cyanobacterium Nostoc muscorum. Philipp. J. Sci. 2007, 136, 75. [Google Scholar]
  139. Tariq, F.; Wang, X.; Saleem, M.H.; Khan, Z.I.; Ahmad, K.; Saleem Malik, I.; Munir, M.; Mahpara, S.; Mehmood, N.; Ahmad, T.; et al. Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Basmati Rice: Implications for Public Health. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Role of exogenously applied glycinebetaine (GB) in modulation of growth and physio-biochemical attributes in plants under stress conditions.
Table 1. Role of exogenously applied glycinebetaine (GB) in modulation of growth and physio-biochemical attributes in plants under stress conditions.
Type of StressMode of
Application
ConcentrationPlant/SpeciesEffectsReference
SaltFoliar spray50 mMOkraEnhanced growth, gaseous exchange and mineral nutrients uptake under saline stress conditions[41]
SaltFoliar spray50 and 100 mMWheatAccumulation of GB, in or outflux of nutrients, activities of SOD, POD and CAT enzymes[42]
DroughtFoliar and pre-sowing50 and 100 mMSunflowerImprovement in water status and turgor potential of cells/tissues under water stress conditions[43]
DroughtFoliar spray30 mMMaizeEnhanced sugars, oil proteins, fiber, Ash, moisture, GB, micro and macro nutrients in seeds of maize [44]
DroughtFoliar spray50 and 100 mMWheatHigh biomass production, shoot length, transpiration rate, root P, N and shoot K+ under varying water regimes[45]
SaltFoliar spray5 and 10 mMCowpeaImproved plant growth, yield production and biochemical constituents under saline conditions[46]
DroughtFoliar spray100 mMRiceImproved growth, yield, chlorophyll pigments and leaf fluorescence[47]
DroughtFoliar spray100 mMRiceImproved chlorophyll, carotenoids, leaf fluorescence and yield attributes[48]
DroughtFoliar spray100 mMRiceIncreased proline, soluble sugar, starch, paddy yield and yield/plant under water stress conditions[49]
DroughtFoliar spray25 and 50 mMCarapa guianensisImproved GB accumulation, and activities of CAT and APX enzymes[50]
DroughtFoliar spray100 mMWheatImprovement in proline and GB accumulaton[51]
DroughtFoliar spray4 mMPeaIncreased soluble proteins, yield as well as activities of SOD, APX and CAT enzymes[52]
Table 2. Role of GB in genetically engineered plants subjected to stress conditions.
Table 2. Role of GB in genetically engineered plants subjected to stress conditions.
StressPlant in Which
Transferred
GeneEffectsReference
Freezing stressArabidopsis thalianaCodAEnhanced tolerance against stress[53]
Salt stressArabidopsis thalianaCodAIncrease in accumulation of GB under stress condition[54]
Drought and salt stressTobaccoAhCMOTolerance against stress[55]
Chilling stressTomatoCod AIncrease in accumulation of GB[56]
Salt and water stressTomatoCodAImproved RWC, chlorophyll, proline and GB[57]
Chilling stressMaizeCodAIncreased germination, GB, photosynthesis, soluble sugars and aminoacids[58]
Salt stressRiceCOXIncreased endogenous GB accumulation [59]
Oxidative, salt and drought stressPotatoCodAReduced membrane damage, high biomass production and RWC[60]
Water stressRiceCodAProtected photosynthetic machinery[61]
Low phosphate TomatoCodAEnhanced enzymes activity and phosphate uptake[62]
Salt stressTomatoCodARegulation of transporters and ions channels[63]
Salt stressTobaccoBADHProtected enzymes and improved photosynthesis[64]
Table 3. Modulations in plant growth and plant biochemical characteristics by exogenous application of different vitamins and nutrients under stress conditions.
Table 3. Modulations in plant growth and plant biochemical characteristics by exogenous application of different vitamins and nutrients under stress conditions.
VitaminsLevelsStressCrops/SpeciesEffectsReferences
Thiamine25, 50, 75, 100, 125 and 150 mg/LSaltMaizeReduced Na+ concentration, MDA, H2O2, RMP while improving N, P, Ca2+, and K+, growth, chlorophyll and the activities of CAT, SOD and POD[68]
Ascorbic acid0.1 and 0.5 1 mMSaltSaccharum spp.Improved growth, activity of POD and SOD as well as proline contents[69]
AsA0.5 and 1 mMDroughtWheatEnhanced net photosynthesis rate, chlorophyll and growth[70]
AsA150 mg/LDroughtQuinoaImproved growth, RMP, Proline, GB, AsA, TSP, amino acids, total soluble sugars, reducing and non-reducing sugars activities of SOD and POD enzymes [71]
Thiamine5 and 10 mg/LSaltSunflowerReduced leaf water potential, improved RWC, chlorophyll, total amino acids, dry mass and concentration of K+[72]
Thiamine50 and 100 mMDroughtWhite cloverImproved biomass, shoot root length and chlorophyll pigments[73]
Tocopherol0.25, 0.5 and 1 mMSaltVicia fabaIncreased growth, leaf area, yield, RWC and nutrients uptake[74]
Tocopherol100, 200 and 300 mg/LDroughtMung beanImproved plant height, total soluble proteins, ascorbic acid, amino acids, activities of POD and CAT enzymes while reducing MDA contents[75]
AsA and Tocopherol400 mg/LSaltFlaxReduced peroxidation and polyphenol oxidase while accumulating proline, antioxidants and carbohydrates[76]
Table 4. Role of phenolics compounds in improvement of plant growth and biochemical attributes under stress conditions.
Table 4. Role of phenolics compounds in improvement of plant growth and biochemical attributes under stress conditions.
Phenolic CompoundsLevelsStressCrops/SpeciesEffectsReference
Caffeic acid100 µMSaltSoybeanDecreased superoxide radical, improved cell viability, SOD, growth, manganese SOD isoforms and Cu/Zn SOD isoforms[109]
Caffeic acid10 and 20 mg/LHeatCottonDecreased electrolyte leakage and amino acids, increased alpha and beta amylase activity[110]
Ellagic acid50 ppmOsmoticChickpeaEnhanced germination growth, Proline, GB, flavonoids, GSH, CAT, POX, SOD and GR while lowering MDA, H2O2, and electrolyte leakage[111]
Coumarin50 ppmSaltWheatImproved osmolytes, soluble sugars, K+/Na+ and antioxidants[112]
Benzoic acid0.25, 0.50, 0.75 and 1 mMHeatCottonImproved N, P, K and Z uptake[113]
Salicylic acid100, 200 and 300 mg/LSaltSunflowerImproved biomass, growth and photosynthetic rate[114]
Salicylic acid0.1, 0.5 and 1 mMSaltMaizeIncreased growth and uptake of N, mg, Fe, Mn and Cu while inhibiting Na+ and Cl-[115]
Salicylic acid100, 150 and 200 ppmDroughtMaizeImproved chlorophyll, RWC, K content and leaf membrane stability[116]
Salicylic acid600 µMSCd toxicityPotatoIncreased RWC, chlorophyll, proline, CAT, SOD, APX, GR decreased MDA, H2O2, O2-[117]
Salicylic acid100 µMCu toxicityRiceImproved RWC, chlorophyll, AsA and redox ratio[118]
Salicylic acid1 mMSaltMaizeIncreased sugar, proline, while decreasing K+ and phenolic contents[119]
Salicylic acid0.01%SaltTomatoIncreased AsA while decreasing phenolic compounds and amino acids[120]
Salicylic acid0.5 mMSaltMustardModulated cell redox balance and increased the activities of enzymes[121]
Salicylic acid0.5 and 1 mMDroughtFennelIncreased water potential, RWC, osmolytes, chlorophyll, carotenoids and seed essential contents[122]
Ferulic acid0.6 mMHeatBlueberryIncreased proline, soluble sugars, RWC, transcription of genes encoding cu/zn SOD, CAT, GR, while decreasing H2O2, MDA, SO2−[123]
Cinnamic acid0.5, 1 and 1.5 mMDroughtWheatImproved proline, SOD, APX, guiacol peroxidase[124]
Vannilic acid and p-hydroxybenzoic acids25 and 50 µMDroughtRiceImproved flavonoids, phenolics, activities of antioxidants[125]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Akram, N.A.; Saleem, M.H.; Shafiq, S.; Naz, H.; Farid-ul-Haq, M.; Ali, B.; Shafiq, F.; Iqbal, M.; Jaremko, M.; Qureshi, K.A. Phytoextracts as Crop Biostimulants and Natural Protective Agents—A Critical Review. Sustainability 2022, 14, 14498. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114498

AMA Style

Akram NA, Saleem MH, Shafiq S, Naz H, Farid-ul-Haq M, Ali B, Shafiq F, Iqbal M, Jaremko M, Qureshi KA. Phytoextracts as Crop Biostimulants and Natural Protective Agents—A Critical Review. Sustainability. 2022; 14(21):14498. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114498

Chicago/Turabian Style

Akram, Nudrat Aisha, Muhammad Hamzah Saleem, Sidra Shafiq, Hira Naz, Muhammad Farid-ul-Haq, Baber Ali, Fahad Shafiq, Muhammad Iqbal, Mariusz Jaremko, and Kamal Ahmad Qureshi. 2022. "Phytoextracts as Crop Biostimulants and Natural Protective Agents—A Critical Review" Sustainability 14, no. 21: 14498. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114498

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop