Exploring the Key Factors Affecting Customer Satisfaction in China’s Sustainable Second-Hand Clothing Market: A Mixed Methods Approach
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Sustainable Second-Hand Clothing Consumption
2.2. Customer Satisfaction
2.3. Grounded Theory
2.4. Kano Model
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Research Design
3.2. Qualitative Analysis
3.2.1. Participants
3.2.2. Measure
3.2.3. Saturation Test
3.3. Quantitative Analysis
3.3.1. Participants
3.3.2. Measure
4. Results and Analysis
4.1. Qualitative Research Results
4.1.1. Semi-Structured Interview
4.1.2. Open Coding
4.1.3. Spindle Coding
4.1.4. Selective Coding
4.1.5. Saturation Detection
4.1.6. Establishment of Evaluation System
4.2. Quantitative Research Results
4.2.1. Questionnaire Survey and Sample Characteristics
4.2.2. Basic Information
4.2.3. Reliability and Validity Analysis
4.2.4. Better–Worse Coefficient Analysis
4.3. Result Integration
Contrastive Analysis
5. Discussion and Implications
5.1. Discussion
5.2. Implications
5.2.1. Theoretical Implications
5.2.2. Managerial Implications
5.3. Limitations and Future Studies
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A. Interview Questions for Experts in the Field of Second-Hand Clothing Market
Interview Questions |
1. How do you assess the current development trend of the second-hand clothing market? |
2. In the second-hand clothing market, what factors can most influence customers’ purchasing decisions? |
3. What do you think are the key factors to improve customer satisfaction? |
4. What role does customer satisfaction play in second-hand clothing sales? |
5. How important do you think effective sales strategies are for used clothing sales? |
6. How would you advise sellers to adjust their sales strategies based on customer satisfaction? |
7. How do you see the impact of technological advances on second-hand clothing sales? |
8. What challenges and opportunities do you think the second-hand clothing industry will face in the future? |
Appendix B. Questionnaire on Customer Satisfaction and Demand for Sustainable Recycling in Second-Hand Clothing Market
- Part A: Basic information
- *1.
- GenderMaleFemale
- *2.
- AgeAge 20 and under21–35 years old35–50 years oldAge 51 and older
- *3.
- Selling platformZhierXianyuother
- *4.
- Education LevelJunior high school and belowHigh school/technical secondary schoolBachelor’s/CollegeMaster’s degree or above
- Part B
Satisfied Should Be so Indifferent Accept Reluctantly Dissatisfied 1 2 3 4 5 1 In your opinion, in the second-hand clothing market, do customers choose products based on Price? 1 2 3 4 5 2 In your opinion, in the second-hand clothing market, do customers choose products according to Product quality? 1 2 3 4 5 3 Do you think that in the second-hand clothing market, do customers choose goods based on Commodity quality? 1 2 3 4 5 4 In your opinion, in the second-hand clothing market, do customers choose products based on Brand reputation? 1 2 3 4 5 5 In your opinion, in the second-hand clothing market, do customers choose goods based on customer service? 1 2 3 4 5 6 In your opinion, in the second-hand clothing market, do customers choose products based on the customer service quality? 1 2 3 4 5 7 In your opinion, in the second-hand clothing market, do customers choose products based on economic environment? 1 2 3 4 5 8 In your opinion, in the second-hand clothing market, do customers choose products according to the promotion of the platform? 1 2 3 4 5 9 Do you think customer satisfaction is related to Sustainable recycling in the second-hand clothing market? 1 2 3 4 5
References
- Calaza, M.G.; Varela Casal, C.; Valencia, J.M.C. Second-hand selling apps and the notion of luxury: Trend networking and circular economy. Int. J. Fash. Des. Technol. Educ. 2022, 16, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Röös, E.; Mayer, A.; Muller, A.; Kalt, G.; Shon, F.; Erb, K.; Rob, H.; Matej, S.; Kaufmann, L.; Pfeifer, C.; et al. Agroecological practices in combination with healthy diets can help meet EU food system policy targets. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 847, 157612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Atik, D.; Cavusoglu, L.; Ozdamar Ertekin, Z.; Fırat, A.F. Fashion, consumer markets, and democratization. J. Consum. Behav. 2022, 21, 1135–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Y.; Wang, R.; Cao, D.; Lee, R. Who are social media influencers for luxury fashion consumption of the Chinese Gen Z? Categorisation and empirical examination. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. Int. J. 2021, 26, 603–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Majumdar, A.; Garg, H.; Jain, R. Managing the barriers of Industry 4.0 adoption and implementation in textile and clothing industry: Interpretive structural model and triple helix framework. Comput. Ind. 2020, 125, 103372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manieson, L.A.; Ferrero-Regis, T. Castoff from the West, pearls in Kantamanto?: A critique of second-hand clothes trade. J. Ind. Ecol. 2022, 27, 811–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hur, E. Rebirth Fashion: Secondhand Clothing Consumption Values and Perceived Risks. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 273, 122951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kozlowski, A.; va Pesaran, D.M. Recontextualising and Appropriating Second-Hand Western Fashion Items in Non-Western Contexts. In State-of-the-Art Upcycling Research and Practice; Lecture Notes in Production Engineering; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 61–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’Adamo, I.; Lupi, G.; Morone, P.; Settembre-Blundo, D. Towards the circular economy in the fashion industry. The second-hand market as a best practice of sustainable responsibility for businesses and consumers. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 46620–46633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, C.-W.R.; Chen, M.T.; Tseng, M.-L.; Jantarakolica, T.; Xu, H. Multi-Objective Production Programming to Systematic Sorting and Remanufacturing in Second-Hand Clothing Recycling Industry. Symmetry 2020, 12, 1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, S.; Choi, T.-M.; Zhang, J. Second-Hand-Clothing Imports in Least-Developed-Countries: The Collapse of Local Clothing Manufacturing and Remedial Measures. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2021, 70, 1774–1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamble, Z.; Behera, B.K. Upcycling textile wastes: Challenges and innovations. Text. Prog. 2021, 53, 65–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- China National Radio. Carbon Emission Reduction Report: Idle Transactions Promote the Development of Circular Economy, Zhuanzhuan: Buying and Selling Second-Hand Items Can Also Effectively Reduce Carbon Emissions. 2021. Available online: https://xueqiu.com/6227555304/198142947 (accessed on 1 December 2024).
- Hinojo, P.; Suárez, D.; García-Mariñoso, B. Drivers of Consumer Participation in Online Second-Hand Transactions. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Tong, H. Research on Psychological Dimensions of E-Commerce Customer Satisfaction. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on E-Business and E-Government, Guangzhou, China, 7–9 May 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Marcos, A.M.B.d.F.; Coelho, A.F.d.M. Service quality, customer satisfaction and customer value: Holistic determinants of loyalty and word-of-mouth in services. TQM J. 2022, 34, 957–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazumder, A.; Kalanidhi, K.B.; Sarkar, S.; Ranjan, P.; Sahu, A.; Kaur, T.; Kaur, D.; Bhattacharya, A.; Priyadarshini Suna, S.; Prakash, B.; et al. Psycho-social and behavioural impact of COVID 19 on young adults: Qualitative research comprising focused group discussion and in-depth interviews. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome. Clin. Res. Rev. 2021, 15, 309–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raza, S.A.; Umer, A.; Qureshi, M.A.; Dahri, A.S. Internet banking service quality, e-customer satisfaction and loyalty: The modified e-SERVQUAL model. TQM J. 2020, 32, 1443–1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, N.L.; Woo, H.; Ramkumar, B. The role of product history in consumer response to online second-hand clothing retail service based on circular fashion. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 60, 102457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corbos, R.-A.; Bunea, O.-I.; Triculescu, M. Towards Sustainable Consumption: Consumer Behavior and Market Segmentation in the Second-Hand Clothing Industry. Amfiteatru Econ. 2023, 25, 1064–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gilal, F.G.; Shaikh, A.R.; Yang, Z.; Gilal, R.G.; Gilal, N.G. Secondhand consumption: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2024, 48, e13059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pretner, G.; Darnall, N.; Testa, F.; Iraldo, F. Are consumers willing to pay for circular products? The role of recycled and second-hand attributes, messaging, and third-party certification. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 175, 105888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, L.; Hong, Y.; Zeng, X. Exploring the influence of content marketing strategies on the expansion of the fashion second-hand market: A theoretical prediction study. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. 2023, 28, 950–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Liang, H.; Wang, Z. The Emerging Fashion Market: A Study of Influencing Factors of Shanghai’s Second-Hand Luxury Consumers’ Purchasing Behavior with Grounded Theory. Sustainability 2024, 16, 10201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Mamun, A.A.; Reza, M.N.H.; Yang, M.; Aziz, N.A. Predicting the significance of consumer environmental values, beliefs, and norms for sustainable fashion behaviors: The case of second-hand clothing. Asia Pac. Manag. Rev. 2023, 29, 179–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radhakrishnan, S. Sustainable Development Goal: Sustainable Management and Use of Natural Resources in Textile and Apparel Industry. In Sustainable Textiles: Production, Processing, Manufacturing & Chemistry; Springer: Singapore, 2022; pp. 165–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gray, S.; Druckman, A.; Sadhukhan, J.; James, K. Reducing the Environmental Impact of Clothing: An Exploration of the Potential of Alternative Business Models. Sustainability 2022, 14, 6292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sepe, F.; Muto, V.; Prisco, A.; Tani, M. Fashion and sustainability: Evidence from the consumption of second-hand clothes. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2024, 32, 949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zahid, N.M.; Khan, J.; Tao, M. Exploring Mindful consumption, Ego involvement, and Social Norms Influencing second-hand Clothing Purchase. Curr. Psychol. 2022, 42, 13960–13974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, J.; Zhou, Y.; Jiang, L.; Shen, L. Exploring Sustainable Fashion Consumption Behavior in the Post-Pandemic Era: Changes in the Antecedents of Second-Hand Clothing-Sharing in China. Sustainability 2022, 14, 9566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Persson, O.; Hinton, J.B. Second-hand clothing markets and a just circular economy? Exploring the role of business forms and profit. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 390, 136139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bosangit, C.; Shilpa, I.; Koenig-Lewis, N. Psst! Don’t Tell Anyone It’s Second-Hand: Drivers and Barriers of Second-Hand Consumption in Emerging Markets; Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks: Cheltenham, UK; pp. 225–249. [CrossRef]
- Ly, B. Competitive advantage and internationalization of a circular economy model in apparel multinationals. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2021, 8, 1944012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lichy, J.; Ryding, D.; Rudawska, E.; Vignali, G. Resale as sustainable social innovation: Understanding shifts in consumer decision-making and shopping orientations for high-end secondhand clothing. Soc. Enterp. J. 2023, 91, 373–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Syafarudin, A. The Effect of Product Quality on Customer Satisfaction Implications on Customer Loyalty in the Era COVID-19. Ilomata Int. J. Tax Account. 2021, 2, 71–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dam, S.M.; Dam, T.C. Relationships between Service Quality, Brand Image, Customer Satisfaction, and Customer Loyalty. J. Asian Financ. Econ. Bus. 2021, 8, 585–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goutam, D.; Gopalakrishna, B.V.; Ganguli, S. Determinants of customer satisfaction and loyalty in e-commerce settings: An emerging economy perspective. Int. J. Internet Mark. Advert. 2021, 15, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, R.U.; Salamzadeh, Y.; Iqbal, Q.; Yang, S. The Impact of Customer Relationship Management and Company Reputation on Customer Loyalty: The Mediating Role of Customer Satisfaction. J. Relatsh. Mark. 2020, 21, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, M.; Manna, R. Sale of second-hand goods by consumers: Mediating role of satisfaction between perceived value and behavioural intentions. The International Review of Retail. Distrib. Consum. Res. 2024, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Te, A.B.; Ignacio, S.G.; Ibraheem, Z.D.; Sam, E.M.C. Customer Preferences in Buying Second-Hand Clothing in Digos City. J. BIMP-EAGA Reg. Dev. 2022, 7, 25–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Medalla, M.E.; Yamagishi, K.; Tiu, A.M.; Tanaid, R.A.; Abellana, D.P.M.; Caballes, S.A.; Jabilles, E.M.; Himang, C.; Bongo, M.; Ocampo, L. Modeling the hierarchical structure of secondhand clothing buying behavior antecedents of millennials. J. Model. Manag. 2020, 15, 1679–1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sumo, P.D.; Arhin, I.; Danquah, R.; Nelson, S.K.; Achaa, L.O.; Nweze, C.N.; Cai, L.; Ji, X. An assessment of Africa’s second-hand clothing value chain: A systematic review and research opportunities. Text. Res. J. 2023, 93, 4701–4719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, B.; Fu, Y.; Li, Y. Young consumers’ motivations and barriers to the purchase of second-hand clothes: An empirical study of China. Waste Manag. 2022, 143, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, N.L.; Jin, B.E.; Kim, T.H. Negative and positive contamination in secondhand fashion consumption: Does culture matter? Int. Mark. Rev. 2023, 40, 1509–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klarin, A. How to conduct a bibliometric content analysis: Guidelines and contributions of content co-occurrence or co-word literature reviews. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2024, 48, 957–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nelson, L.K. Computational Grounded Theory. Sociol. Methods Res. 2020, 49, 3–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheong, H.; Lyons, A.; Houghton, R.; Majumdar, A. Secondary Qualitative Research Methodology Using Online Data within the Context of Social Sciences. Int. J. Qual. Methods 2023, 22, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Susanto, P.C.; Yuntina, L.; Saribanon, E.; Soehaditama, J.P.; Liana, E. Qualitative Method Concepts: Literature Review, Focus Group Discussion, Ethnography and Grounded Theory. Siber J. Adv. Multidiscip. 2024, 2, 262–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cullen, M.M.; Brennan, N.M. Grounded Theory: Description, Divergences and Application. Account. Financ. Gov. Rev. 2021, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoda, R. Socio-Technical Grounded Theory for Software Engineering. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 2021, 48, 3808–3832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Charmaz, K.; Thornberg, R. The Pursuit of Quality in Grounded Theory. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2020, 18, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamie, K.; Rathbone, A.P. Using theory and reflexivity to preserve methodological rigour of data collection in qualitative research. Res. Methods Med. Health Sci. 2022, 3, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, M.; Peng, Y.; Han, M.; Liu, H.; Xie, L. Optimizing nursing services for orthopaedic trauma patients: A holistic approach through the SERVQUAL and Kano models. Res. Sq. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ta, A.H.; Aarikka-Stenroos, L.; Litovuo, L. Customer Experience in Circular Economy: Experiential Dimensions among Consumers of Reused and Recycled Clothes. Sustainability 2022, 14, 509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sundararaj, V. A detailed behavioral analysis on consumer and customer changing behavior with respect to social networking sites. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 58, 102190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, A.; Mehmood, K.; Kwan, H.K. Green knowledge management: A key driver of green technology innovation and sustainable performance in the construction organizations. J. Innov. Knowl. 2024, 9, 100455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zanjirani Farahani, R.; Asgari, N.; Van Wassenhove, L. Fast Fashion, Charities and the Circular Economy: Challenges for Operations Management. Prod. Oper. Manag. 2022, 31, 1089–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Li, Q.; Li, C.; Qin, Q. User requirements analysis of new energy vehicles based on improved Kano model. Energy 2024, 309, 133134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azad, A.; Sernbo, E.; Svärd, V.; Holmlund, L.; Björk Brämberg, E. Conducting In-Depth Interviews via Mobile Phone with Persons with Common Mental Disorders and Multimorbidity: The Challenges and Advantages as Experienced by Participants and Researchers. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 11828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deterding, N.M.; Waters, M.C. Flexible Coding of In-depth Interviews. Sociol. Methods Res. 2018, 50, 08–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Süsser, D.; Ceglarz, A.; Gaschnig, H.; Stavrakas, V.; Flamos, A.; Giannakidis, G.; Lilliestam, J. Model-based policymaking or policy-based modelling? How energy models and energy policy interact. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2021, 75, 101984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Makri, C.; Neely, A. Grounded Theory: A Guide for Exploratory Studies in Management Research. Int. J. Qual. Methods 2021, 20, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, W.M. What is qualitative research? an overview and guidelines. Australas. Mark. J. (AMJ) 2024, 14413582241264619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Striepe, M. Combining concept mapping with semi-structured interviews: Adding another dimension to the research process. Int. J. Res. Method Educ. 2020, 44, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belina, A. Semi-structured interviewing as a tool for understanding informal civil society. Volunt. Sect. Rev. 2022, 14, 331–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fofana, F.; Bazeley, P.; Regnault, A. Applying a mixed methods design to test saturation for qualitative data in health outcomes research. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0234898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Peters, H.C. A-Methodological Saturation: A Grounded Theory Analysis. Couns. Psychol. 2023, 51, 933–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Craig, S.L.; McInroy, L.B.; Goulden, A.; Eaton, A.D. Engaging the Senses in Qualitative Research via Multimodal Coding: Triangulating Transcript, Audio, and Video Data in a Study With Sexual and Gender Minority Youth. Int. J. Qual. Methods 2021, 20, 160940692110136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bukhari, S.A.R. Sample Size Determination Using Krejcie and Morgan Table; ResearchGate: Berlin, Germany, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, D.; Wu, J.; Xiao, J.; Xie, R. Needs analysis of the construction of regional ethics committees at the grassroots medical institution based on the Kano model in Shanghai. Res. Sq. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Busetto, L.; Wick, W.; Gumbinger, C. How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurol. Res. Pract. 2020, 2, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hund, A.; Wagner, H.-T.; Beimborn, D.; Weitzel, T. Digital innovation: Review and novel perspective. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 2021, 30, 101695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Ballesteros-Pérez, P.; Skitmore, M.; Yang, G.; Philbin, S.P.; Lu, Q. Factors influencing environmental performance: A bibliometric review and future research agenda. Int. J. Urban Sci. 2021, 27, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mundt, E.G.; Wilke, D.; Anacker, H.; Dumitrescu, R. Principles for the Effective Application of Systems Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review and Application Use Case. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), Maui, HI, USA, 1–4 October 2023; pp. 1307–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alsubhi, M.; Blake, M.; Nguyen, T.; Majmudar, I.; Moodie, M.; Ananthapavan, J. Consumer willingness to pay for healthier food products: A systematic review. Obes. Rev. 2022, 24, 903–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Narayanan, S.; Singh, G.A. Consumers’ willingness to pay for corporate social responsibility: Theory and evidence. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2023, 47, 2212–2244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, S.; Wang, Z.; Guo, X.; Wang, F.; Huang, J.; Sun, B.; Wang, X. Sourdough improves the quality of whole-wheat flour products: Mechanisms and challenges—A review. Food Chem. 2021, 360, 130038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mihafu, F.D.; Issa, J.Y.; Kamiyango, M.W. Implication of Sensory Evaluation and Quality Assessment in Food Product Development: A Review. Curr. Res. Nutr. Food Sci. J. 2020, 8, 690–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cahyadi, D.; Ismail, S.H.; Mohammad, R.; Daud, M.Y.M.; Irwan, M. An Aesthetic ‘Touch’ for the Development of Rattan Bag Handicraft Products in Indonesia: A Systematic Literature Review. Harmon. J. Arts Res. Educ. 2024, 24, 77–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kervyn, N.; Fiske, S.T.; Malone, C. Social perception of brands: Warmth and competence define images of both brands and social groups. Consum. Psychol. Rev. 2021, 5, 51–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Javaid, M.; Haleem, A.; Singh, R.P.; Rab, S.; Suman, R. Internet of Behaviours (IoB) and its role in customer services. Sens. Int. 2021, 2, 100122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nicolescu, L.; Tudorache, M.T. Human-Computer Interaction in Customer Service: The Experience with AI Chatbots—A Systematic Literature Review. Electronics 2022, 11, 1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sundram, S.; Kavitha, P.; Suchitra, S. A Review On Customer Service Quality In Big Bazaar Tirupur. Int. J. Aquat. Sci. 2021, 12, 1867–1876. [Google Scholar]
- Friedline, T.; Chen, Z.; Morrow, S. Families’ Financial Stress & Well-Being: The Importance of the Economy and Economic Environments. J. Fam. Econ. Issues 2020, 42, 34–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prados Sánchez, G.; Cózar-Gutiérrez, R.; del Olmo-Muñoz, J.; González-Calero, J.A. Impact of a gamified platform in the promotion of reading comprehension and attitudes towards reading in primary education. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. 2021, 36, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riaz, M.U.; Guang, L.X.; Zafar, M.; Shahzad, F.; Shahbaz, M.; Lateef, M. Consumers’ purchase intention and decision-making process through social networking sites: A social commerce construct. Behav. Inf. Technol. 2020, 40, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, S. Introduction of Product Reviews as an Important Part of a Brand’s Marketing Success; CSMFL Publications eBooks: Jagadhri, India, 2023; pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Factors Affecting Customer Satisfaction in Second-hand Market (Positive Question) | Satisfied | Should Be So | Indifferent | Accept Reluctantly | Dissatisfied | |
Satisfied | Q | A | A | A | O | |
Should be so | R | I | I | I | M | |
Indifferent | R | I | I | I | M | |
Accept reluctantly | R | I | I | I | M | |
Dissatisfied | R | R | R | R | Q |
Number | Question |
---|---|
1 | How do you evaluate the current development trend of the second-hand clothing market? |
2 | In the second-hand clothing market, what factors can most influence customers’ purchasing decisions? |
3 | What do you think are the key factors to improve customer satisfaction? |
4 | What role does customer satisfaction play in second-hand clothing sales? |
5 | How important do you think effective sales strategies are for second-hand clothing sales? |
6 | How would you suggest sellers adjust their sales strategies based on customer satisfaction? |
7 | How do you view the impact of technological progress on second-hand clothing sales? |
8 | What challenges and opportunities do you think the second-hand clothing industry will face in the future? |
Respondent (Number) | Factors Affecting the Purchase of Customers in the Second-Hand Clothing Market | Trends in the Second-Hand Clothing Market |
---|---|---|
1 | The quality and condition of the product, the price, the reputation of the store and the shopping experience, the speed of logistics, the ease of return and exchange, the quality of customer service and the recognition of environmental and social responsibility during the purchase process. | A significant upward trend, acceptance and demand in the second-hand clothing market is expanding rapidly |
2 | Price and quality. | It continues to grow globally and is particularly popular with young people such as millennials and Gen Z |
3 | Product quality, price and uniqueness. In addition, the purchase experience (such as a convenient shopping process and good customer service) and social recognition (such as friend recommendations or positive reviews on social media) also play an important role. | Consumers are increasingly focusing on sustainability and reducing waste, which has made the second-hand clothing market popular |
4 | Price, customer service, quality and variety. | Strong growth momentum, the scale will continue to expand |
5 | Pricing strategies, marketing campaigns, customer service, product diversity, market positioning and sustainable practices. Reasonable prices, attractive marketing campaigns, excellent customer service, diverse product selection, clear market positioning and environmentally friendly store image. | Significant growth stage, mainly due to environmental awareness |
6 | Reasonable price, attractive marketing strategies, quality service, diversified product selection, clear market positioning. | Increase |
7 | Efficient customer service, accurate market positioning. | Further expanded because of technological advances |
8 | Efficient customer service, personalized product recommendation function. | Expansion, and the emergence of digital and intelligent trends |
Number | Concept | Category |
---|---|---|
1 | Product quality and condition | Product quality |
2 | Price | Pricing strategy |
3 | Store reputation | Market positioning |
4 | Shopping experience, ease of returns, quality of customer service | Strong growth momentum, the scale will continue to increase, customer service |
5 | Environmental protection and social responsibility | Significant growth stage, mainly due to environmental awareness |
6 | Reasonable price, attractive marketing means, quality service, diversified product selection, clear market positioning | Sustainable practice |
7 | Marketing activity | Promotion |
Principal Category | Preliminary Category |
---|---|
Pricing strategy | Price |
Product quality | Product quality, commodity quality |
Brand image | Brand reputation |
Customer service | Customer service, customer service quality |
Market environment | Economic environment |
Promotion | The promotion of the platform |
Criteria Layer | Indicator Layer |
---|---|
Pricing strategy | Price |
Product quality | Product quality |
Commodity quality | |
Brand image | Brand reputation |
Customer service | Customer service |
Customer service quality | |
Market environment | Economic environment |
Promotion | The promotion of the platform |
Criteria Layer | Indicator Layer | Detailed Description | References |
---|---|---|---|
Pricing strategy | Price | The cost customers pay for products or services. | [75,76] |
Product quality | Product quality | The overall standard of a product, including durability and appearance. | [77,78] |
Commodity quality | The intrinsic features of a product, such as material and craftsmanship. | [79] | |
Brand image | Brand reputation | The public perception and trustworthiness of a brand. | [80] |
Customer service | Customer service | Assistance provided to customers during and after purchase. | [81,82] |
Customer service quality | The effectiveness and experience of customer support. | [83] | |
Market environment | Economic environment | Economic factors like income levels and consumer spending. | [84] |
Promotion | The promotion of the platform | Marketing efforts to attract customers and boost visibility. | [85] |
Item | Classification | Percent (%) |
---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 56.2 |
Female | 43.8 | |
Age | 20 and below | 1.5 |
21–34 years old | 23.4 | |
35-–years old | 46.9 | |
51 and above | 28.2 | |
Sales Platform | Zhier | 67.5 |
Xianyu | 28.3 | |
Others | 4.2 | |
Education Level | Junior high school and below | 5.8 |
High school/technical secondary school | 20.9 | |
Bachelor’s degree/College degree | 70.7 | |
Master’s degree or above | 2.6 |
KMO and Bartlett’s Test | Reliability Statistics | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy | Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity | Cronbach’s Alpha | Number of Items | ||
0.904 | Approx. Chi-Square | df | Sig. | 0.863 | 9 |
581.684 | 36 | 0.000 |
Item | Factor | A | O | M | I | R | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 36 | 41 | 11 | 5 | 8 | 52.9% |
Female | 40 | 28 | 12 | 5 | 5 | 47.1% | |
Education | Junior high school and below | 3 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5.8% |
High school/technical secondary school | 11 | 17 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 20.9% | |
Bachelor’s degree/College | 58 | 44 | 20 | 6 | 7 | 70.7% | |
Master’s degree or above | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.6% | |
Age | 20 and below | 10 | 13 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 17.8% |
21–35 | 37 | 23 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 38.2% | |
35–50 | 19 | 25 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 29.8% | |
51 and above | 10 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 14.1% | |
Platform | Zhier | 53 | 47 | 18 | 5 | 6 | 67.5% |
Xianyu | 21 | 16 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 28.3% | |
Others | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.2% |
Item | Influence Factor | A | O | M | I | R | Mean | Better | Worse |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PQ | Product quality | 67 | 80 | 28 | 12 | 4 | A | 0.79 | −0.58 |
CQ | Commodity quality | 70 | 83 | 23 | 10 | 5 | A | 0.82 | −0.57 |
Price | Price | 65 | 79 | 36 | 9 | 2 | O | 0.76 | −0.61 |
BR | Brand reputation | 72 | 71 | 33 | 7 | 8 | A | 0.78 | −0.57 |
CS | Customer service | 62 | 73 | 35 | 16 | 5 | O | 0.73 | −0.58 |
CSQ | Customer service quality | 68 | 61 | 38 | 12 | 12 | A | 0.72 | −0.55 |
EE | Economic environment | 62 | 71 | 31 | 15 | 12 | O | 0.74 | −0.57 |
Promotion | The promotion of the platform | 67 | 71 | 27 | 19 | 7 | O | 0.75 | −0.53 |
Relationship | Customer satisfaction and sales in the second-hand clothing market | 76 | 69 | 23 | 10 | 13 | A | 0.81 | −0.52 |
ANOVA | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Causes | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F |
PQ | 23.019 | 4 | 5.755 | 6.864 |
CQ | 25.160 | 4 | 6.290 | 7.693 |
Price | 22.957 | 4 | 5.739 | 8.093 |
BR | 37.590 | 4 | 9.389 | 10.441 |
CS | 29.297 | 4 | 7.324 | 7.802 |
CSQ | 81.425 | 4 | 20.359 | 21.534 |
EE | 87.057 | 4 | 21.764 | 24.164 |
Promotion | 78.252 | 4 | 19.563 | 23.804 |
KMO and Bartlett’s Test | ||
---|---|---|
Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. | 0.89 | |
Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity | Approx. Chi-Square | 486.073 |
df | 28 | |
Sig. | 0.000 |
Total Variance Explained | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component | Initial Eigenvalues | Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings | ||||
Total | % of Variance | Cumulative % | Total | % of Variance | Cumulative % | |
1 | 3.89 | 48.623 | 48.623 | 3.89 | 48.623 | 48.623 |
2 | 0.841 | 10.508 | 59.131 | |||
3 | 0.732 | 9.154 | 68.286 | |||
4 | 0.612 | 7.653 | 75.939 | |||
5 | 0.59 | 7.372 | 83.311 | |||
6 | 0.531 | 6.637 | 89.948 | |||
7 | 0.432 | 5.404 | 95.352 | |||
8 | 0.372 | 4.648 | 100 |
Communalities | ||
---|---|---|
Initial | Extraction | |
PQ | 1 | 0.402 |
CQ | 1 | 0.42 |
Price | 1 | 0.423 |
BR | 1 | 0.433 |
CS | 1 | 0.494 |
CSQ | 1 | 0.612 |
EE | 1 | 0.574 |
Promotion | 1 | 0.531 |
ANOVA | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F | Sig. | ||
Gender | PQ | 0.245 | 1 | 0.245 | 0.259 | 0.611 |
CQ | 1.574 | 1 | 1.574 | 1.693 | 0.195 | |
Price | 0.003 | 1 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.955 | |
BR | 0.045 | 1 | 0.045 | 0.042 | 0.838 | |
CS | 0.123 | 1 | 0.123 | 0.115 | 0.735 | |
CSQ | 0.073 | 1 | 0.073 | 0.054 | 0.817 | |
EE | 0.886 | 1 | 0.886 | 0.66 | 0.418 | |
Promotion | 0.328 | 1 | 0.328 | 0.269 | 0.605 | |
Age | PQ | 7.985 | 3 | 2.662 | 2.911 | 0.036 |
CQ | 5.786 | 3 | 1.929 | 2.104 | 0.101 | |
Price | 3.081 | 3 | 1.027 | 1.265 | 0.288 | |
BR | 15.688 | 3 | 5.229 | 5.166 | 0.002 | |
CS | 1.259 | 3 | 0.42 | 0.387 | 0.762 | |
CSQ | 6.215 | 3 | 2.072 | 1.543 | 0.205 | |
EE | 10.314 | 3 | 3.438 | 2.632 | 0.051 | |
Promotion | 8.504 | 3 | 2.835 | 2.381 | 0.071 | |
Platform | PQ | 0.535 | 2 | 0.267 | 0.282 | 0.755 |
CQ | 2.782 | 2 | 1.391 | 1.499 | 0.226 | |
Price | 3.979 | 2 | 1.99 | 2.479 | 0.087 | |
BR | 1.208 | 2 | 0.604 | 0.557 | 0.574 | |
CS | 1.96 | 2 | 0.98 | 0.912 | 0.403 | |
CSQ | 4.253 | 2 | 2.127 | 1.58 | 0.209 | |
EE | 1.831 | 2 | 0.915 | 0.681 | 0.507 | |
Promotion | 4.781 | 2 | 2.39 | 1.985 | 0.14 | |
Educational Level | PQ | 1.402 | 3 | 0.467 | 0.492 | 0.688 |
CQ | 2.377 | 3 | 0.792 | 0.847 | 0.47 | |
Price | 2.401 | 3 | 0.8 | 0.981 | 0.403 | |
BR | 1.029 | 3 | 0.343 | 0.315 | 0.815 | |
CS | 1.252 | 3 | 0.417 | 0.385 | 0.764 | |
CSQ | 7.009 | 3 | 2.336 | 1.746 | 0.159 | |
EE | 9.696 | 3 | 3.232 | 2.468 | 0.063 | |
Promotion | 4.173 | 3 | 1.391 | 1.146 | 0.332 |
Dependent Variable | (I) Age | (J) Age | Mean Difference (I-J) | Std. Error | Sig. | 95% Confidence Interval | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PQ | 20 and below | 21–35 | 0.029 | 0.199 | 0.999 | −0.49 | 0.54 |
35–50 | −0.405 | 0.207 | 0.21 | −0.94 | 0.13 | ||
51 and above | −0.362 | 0.246 | 0.459 | −1 | 0.28 | ||
21–35 | 20 and below | −0.029 | 0.199 | 0.999 | −0.54 | 0.49 | |
35–50 | −0.434 | 0.169 | 0.054 | −0.87 | 0 | ||
51 and above | −0.391 | 0.215 | 0.27 | −0.95 | 0.17 | ||
35–50 | 20 and below | 0.405 | 0.207 | 0.21 | −0.13 | 0.94 | |
21–35 | 0.434 | 0.169 | 0.054 | 0 | 0.87 | ||
51 and above | 0.043 | 0.223 | 0.997 | −0.54 | 0.62 | ||
51 and above | 20 and below | 0.362 | 0.246 | 0.459 | −0.28 | 1 | |
21–35 | 0.391 | 0.215 | 0.27 | −0.17 | 0.95 | ||
35–50 | −0.043 | 0.223 | 0.997 | −0.62 | 0.54 | ||
CQ | 20 and below | 21–35 | 0.245 | 0.199 | 0.609 | −0.27 | 0.76 |
35–50 | −0.117 | 0.207 | 0.942 | −0.66 | 0.42 | ||
51 and above | −0.178 | 0.247 | 0.889 | −0.82 | 0.46 | ||
21–35 | 20 and below | −0.245 | 0.199 | 0.609 | −0.76 | 0.27 | |
35–50 | −0.362 | 0.169 | 0.145 | −0.8 | 0.08 | ||
51 and above | −0.422 | 0.216 | 0.208 | −0.98 | 0.14 | ||
35–50 | 20 and below | 0.117 | 0.207 | 0.942 | −0.42 | 0.66 | |
21–35 | 0.362 | 0.169 | 0.145 | −0.08 | 0.8 | ||
51 and above | −0.06 | 0.224 | 0.993 | −0.64 | 0.52 | ||
51 and above | 20 and below | 0.178 | 0.247 | 0.889 | −0.46 | 0.82 | |
21–35 | 0.422 | 0.216 | 0.208 | −0.14 | 0.98 | ||
35–50 | 0.06 | 0.224 | 0.993 | −0.52 | 0.64 | ||
Price | 20 and below | 21–35 | 0.178 | 0.187 | 0.777 | −0.31 | 0.66 |
35–50 | −0.123 | 0.195 | 0.923 | −0.63 | 0.38 | ||
51 and above | −0.037 | 0.232 | 0.999 | −0.64 | 0.57 | ||
21–35 | 20 and below | −0.178 | 0.187 | 0.777 | −0.66 | 0.31 | |
35–50 | −0.301 | 0.159 | 0.236 | −0.71 | 0.11 | ||
51 and above | −0.215 | 0.203 | 0.714 | −0.74 | 0.31 | ||
35–50 | 20 and below | 0.123 | 0.195 | 0.923 | −0.38 | 0.63 | |
21–35 | 0.301 | 0.159 | 0.236 | −0.11 | 0.71 | ||
51 and above | 0.086 | 0.21 | 0.977 | −0.46 | 0.63 | ||
51 and above | 20 and below | 0.037 | 0.232 | 0.999 | −0.57 | 0.64 | |
21–35 | 0.215 | 0.203 | 0.714 | −0.31 | 0.74 | ||
35–50 | −0.086 | 0.21 | 0.977 | −0.63 | 0.46 | ||
BR | 20 and below | 21–35 | 0.358 | 0.209 | 0.319 | −0.18 | 0.9 |
35–50 | −0.339 | 0.218 | 0.407 | −0.9 | 0.23 | ||
51 and above | −0.008 | 0.259 | 1 | −0.68 | 0.66 | ||
21–35 | 20 and below | −0.358 | 0.209 | 0.319 | −0.9 | 0.18 | |
35–50 | −0.697 * | 0.178 | 0.001 | −1.16 | −0.24 | ||
51 and above | −0.366 | 0.227 | 0.373 | −0.95 | 0.22 | ||
35–50 | 20 and below | 0.339 | 0.218 | 0.407 | −0.23 | 0.9 | |
21–35 | 0.697 * | 0.178 | 0.001 | 0.24 | 1.16 | ||
51 and above | 0.331 | 0.235 | 0.495 | −0.28 | 0.94 | ||
51 and above | 20 and below | 0.008 | 0.259 | 1 | −0.66 | 0.68 | |
21–35 | 0.366 | 0.227 | 0.373 | −0.22 | 0.95 | ||
35–50 | −0.331 | 0.235 | 0.495 | −0.94 | 0.28 | ||
CS | 20 and below | 21–35 | 0.12 | 0.216 | 0.945 | −0.44 | 0.68 |
35–50 | −0.063 | 0.226 | 0.992 | −0.65 | 0.52 | ||
51 and above | 0.11 | 0.268 | 0.977 | −0.59 | 0.81 | ||
21–35 | 20 and below | −0.12 | 0.216 | 0.945 | −0.68 | 0.44 | |
35–50 | −0.183 | 0.184 | 0.752 | −0.66 | 0.29 | ||
51 and above | −0.01 | 0.234 | 1 | −0.62 | 0.6 | ||
35–50 | 20 and below | 0.063 | 0.226 | 0.992 | −0.52 | 0.65 | |
21–35 | 0.183 | 0.184 | 0.752 | −0.29 | 0.66 | ||
51 and above | 0.173 | 0.243 | 0.892 | −0.46 | 0.8 | ||
51 and above | 20 and below | −0.11 | 0.268 | 0.977 | −0.81 | 0.59 | |
21–35 | 0.01 | 0.234 | 1 | −0.6 | 0.62 | ||
35–50 | −0.173 | 0.243 | 0.892 | −0.8 | 0.46 | ||
CSQ | 20 and below | 21–35 | 0.118 | 0.241 | 0.961 | −0.51 | 0.74 |
35–50 | −0.075 | 0.251 | 0.991 | −0.73 | 0.58 | ||
51 and above | −0.438 | 0.299 | 0.46 | −1.21 | 0.34 | ||
21–35 | 20 and below | −0.118 | 0.241 | 0.961 | −0.74 | 0.51 | |
35–50 | −0.193 | 0.205 | 0.782 | −0.72 | 0.34 | ||
51 and above | −0.556 | 0.261 | 0.148 | −1.23 | 0.12 | ||
35–50 | 20 and below | 0.075 | 0.251 | 0.991 | −0.58 | 0.73 | |
21–35 | 0.193 | 0.205 | 0.782 | −0.34 | 0.72 | ||
51 and above | −0.363 | 0.271 | 0.539 | −1.06 | 0.34 | ||
51 and above | 20 and below | 0.438 | 0.299 | 0.46 | −0.34 | 1.21 | |
21–35 | 0.556 | 0.261 | 0.148 | −0.12 | 1.23 | ||
35–50 | 0.363 | 0.271 | 0.539 | −0.34 | 1.06 | ||
EE | 20 and below | 21–35 | 0.361 | 0.237 | 0.428 | −0.25 | 0.98 |
35–50 | −0.191 | 0.248 | 0.867 | −0.83 | 0.45 | ||
51 and above | 0.005 | 0.295 | 1 | −0.76 | 0.77 | ||
21–35 | 20 and below | −0.361 | 0.237 | 0.428 | −0.98 | 0.25 | |
35–50 | −0.552 * | 0.202 | 0.034 | −1.08 | -0.03 | ||
51 and above | −0.355 | 0.257 | 0.514 | −1.02 | 0.31 | ||
35–50 | 20 and below | 0.191 | 0.248 | 0.867 | −0.45 | 0.83 | |
21–35 | 0.552 * | 0.202 | 0.034 | 0.03 | 1.08 | ||
51 and above | 0.197 | 0.267 | 0.882 | −0.5 | 0.89 | ||
51 and above | 20 and below | −0.005 | 0.295 | 1 | −0.77 | 0.76 | |
21–35 | 0.355 | 0.257 | 0.514 | −0.31 | 1.02 | ||
35–50 | −0.197 | 0.267 | 0.882 | −0.89 | 0.5 | ||
Promotion | 20 and below | 21–35 | 0.335 | 0.227 | 0.452 | −0.25 | 0.92 |
35–50 | 0.329 | 0.236 | 0.506 | −0.28 | 0.94 | ||
51 and above | −0.224 | 0.281 | 0.855 | −0.95 | 0.5 | ||
21–35 | 20 and below | −0.335 | 0.227 | 0.452 | −0.92 | 0.25 | |
35–50 | −0.006 | 0.193 | 1 | −0.51 | 0.49 | ||
51 and above | −0.56 | 0.246 | 0.107 | −1.2 | 0.08 | ||
35–50 | 20 and below | −0.329 | 0.236 | 0.506 | −0.94 | 0.28 | |
21–35 | 0.006 | 0.193 | 1 | −0.49 | 0.51 | ||
51 and above | −0.554 | 0.255 | 0.135 | −1.21 | 0.11 | ||
51 and above | 20 and below | 0.224 | 0.281 | 0.855 | −0.5 | 0.95 | |
21–35 | 0.56 | 0.246 | 0.107 | −0.08 | 1.2 | ||
35–50 | 0.554 | 0.255 | 0.135 | −0.11 | 1.21 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Yao, Y.; Xu, H.; Song, H.-Y. Exploring the Key Factors Affecting Customer Satisfaction in China’s Sustainable Second-Hand Clothing Market: A Mixed Methods Approach. Sustainability 2025, 17, 1694. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041694
Yao Y, Xu H, Song H-Y. Exploring the Key Factors Affecting Customer Satisfaction in China’s Sustainable Second-Hand Clothing Market: A Mixed Methods Approach. Sustainability. 2025; 17(4):1694. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041694
Chicago/Turabian StyleYao, Yu, Huiya Xu, and Ha-Young Song. 2025. "Exploring the Key Factors Affecting Customer Satisfaction in China’s Sustainable Second-Hand Clothing Market: A Mixed Methods Approach" Sustainability 17, no. 4: 1694. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041694
APA StyleYao, Y., Xu, H., & Song, H.-Y. (2025). Exploring the Key Factors Affecting Customer Satisfaction in China’s Sustainable Second-Hand Clothing Market: A Mixed Methods Approach. Sustainability, 17(4), 1694. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041694