1. Introduction
The significant role of inequalities in the development and evolution of Mathematics is well known. Some basic notions related to them were already in use by the ancient Greeks, such as triangle and isoperimetric inequalities. However, inequalities were not employed either in arithmetic or any other kind of number manipulation [
1]. The formalization of the Mathematical Theory of Inequalities essentially begins in the 18th century with the studies carried out by Gauss. It was continued by Cauchy, and Chebyshov, who had the idea to apply some inequalities to Mathematical Analysis. Later, the Russian mathematician Bunyakovsky, proved in 1859 the well-known Cauchy–Schwarz inequality for the case of infinite dimensions.
Likewise, the research conducted by Hardy on this subject should be recognized as particularly significant, since it went beyond particular inequalities. Hardy succeeded in gathering together the best mathematicians of the moment to solve problems related to inequalities. Furthermore, he founded the Journal of the London Mathematical Society, a magazine especially suitable to publish papers on inequalities. Together with renowned mathematicians such as Littlewood and Polya, he developed the famous volume entitled “Inequalities” [
2], which was the first monograph on this subject.
The book became a milestone in the field of inequalities, and it achieved the goal of giving structure, systematization and formalization to an apparently isolated set of results, and, by doing so, it changed them into a theory. At present, inequalities have reached an outstanding theoretical and applied development and they are the methodological base of processes of approximation, estimation, boundedness, interpolation, etc. In general, they are fundamental in every modeling problem.
As usual, a function
is said to be
convex on the interval
, if the inequality
holds for all
and
. We say that
f is
concave if
is convex. It is well known that every convex function is continuous and thus integrable on any compact interval.
Among many important inequalities involving convex functions, we will focus here on the following ones. If
is a convex function on the interval
I, then
for every
with
.
The converse inequalities hold if the function
f is concave on the interval
I. This seminal result was proved in [
3] and it is known as Hermite–Hadamard inequality (see [
4,
5] for more details). Since its discovery, this inequality has received considerable attention.
In recent years, this inequality has been generalized to conformable integrals in [
6,
7,
8,
9,
10,
11,
12,
13,
14]. In addition, there are many works generalizing other classical inequalities from the fractional calculus viewpoint (see, e.g., [
15,
16]). The aim of this paper is to show some new results related to Hermite–Hadamard inequalities via non-conformable integrals.
The authors in [
17] introduced a useful conformable derivative; in addition, a non-conformable derivative is introduced in [
18]. These derivatives are interesting from a theoretical viewpoint and useful in many applications [
19,
20,
21].
Next, we give the definition of the non-conformable derivative related to our results.
Definition 1. Given an interval , a function , and , the non-conformable derivative of
f of order
at
tis defined by We say that f is α-differentiable at t if there exists and it is finite.
Note that if
f is differentiable at
t, then
where
denotes the usual derivative.
Following the ideas in [
18], we can easily prove the next result.
Theorem 1. Let , and α-differentiable functions at t. Then:
for all ,
,
,
for every constant function ,
.
Definition 2. Let and . We define the following linear spaces: Note that, if , then .
Motivated by this non-conformable derivative, we define the non-conformable integrals that appear in the inequalities of this paper.
Definition 3. Let and . For each function , we definefor every . Definition 4. Let and . For each function , let us define the fractional integralsfor every . The symmetry of these non-conformable integral operators will allow for obtaining new results related to Hermite–Hadamard inequality.
2. Main Results
We start with an equality that will be useful.
Lemma 1. Let , and be a differentiable function. If , thenwith Proof. First of all, note that Hardy’s inequalities
give that
since
and
.
We can write
as follows:
Integration by parts gives that the first integral is equal to
We obtain, in a similar way,
These equalities give the desired result. □
Lemma 1 allows for proving several inequalities.
Proposition 1. Let , and be a differentiable function. If and for every , then Proof. We have
since the integrand is the product of two non-negative functions. Thus, Lemma 1 gives the inequality. □
Corollary 1. Let , and be a differentiable function. If , and f is decreasing on and increasing on , then Proof. Since f is decreasing on and increasing on , we have for every , and Proposition 1 gives the inequality. □
Theorem 2. Let , and be a differentiable function. If and is a convex function, then Proof. Since , the function is concave, and thus for every and . Hence, for every , and thus for every , since on .
If we define
, then
for every
, and, thus, since
satisfies
and
, we conclude
for every
. Therefore,
for every
.
Since
is a convex function, we obtain
and
Hence,
and Lemma 1 gives the inequality. □
The argument in the proof of Theorem 2 also allows for dealing with the case .
Theorem 3. Let , and be a differentiable function. Assume that and is a convex function.
If , then Proof. Since , the function is convex, and thus for every . Hence, for every , and thus for every , since on .
If we define
, then
for every
and
If , then for every , and, thus, since satisfies and , we conclude for every . Therefore, for every . Note that this inequality also holds for .
If , then for every , and so, for every . Therefore, for every .
Since
is a convex function, we obtain
If
, then
Hence,
if
, and
if
. Thus, Lemma 1 gives the inequalities. □
We deal now with the case .
Proposition 2. Let and be a differentiable function. If and is a convex function, then Proof. Let us define .
First of all, note that .
In addition, we have
for every
. Thus, the argument in the proof of Theorem 3 allows for concluding
since
□
Theorem 4. Let , and be a differentiable function. If and is convex on , then Proof. Since
is convex on
, we have
, with
A simple computation gives
and we obtain the inequality by adding these expressions of
and
. □
Let us state a result relating the three integral operators.
Proposition 3. Let , and be a convex function. Then, Proof. Since
for every
, we obtain
for every
.
Since
, Equation (
2) gives
By using Equation (
3), we obtain
□
Theorem 5. Let , and be a convex function. Then, Proof. By using the convexity of
f, we obtain
The other inequality follows from a similar argument. □
Theorem 6. Let , and be a convex function. Then, Furthermore, if and , then Proof. Since
, the classical Hermite–Hadamard inequality gives
If
and
, then Proposition 3 and Theorem 5 give
Since
, we obtain
and thus we have
□
Theorem 7. Let and be a convex function. Then, Proof. The change of variables
and the convexity of
f give
Integration by parts gives
and this finishes the proof. □