Astrophysics > Astrophysics of Galaxies
[Submitted on 8 Nov 2018]
Title:Observational determination of the galaxy bias from cosmic variance with a random pointing survey: Clustering of z~2 galaxies from Hubble's BoRG survey
View PDFAbstract:Gravitational clustering broadens the count-in-cells distribution of galaxies for surveys along uncorrelated (well-separated) lines of sight beyond Poisson noise. A number of methods have proposed to measure this excess "cosmic" variance to constrain the galaxy bias (i.e. the strength of clustering) independently of the two-point correlation function. Here we present an observational application of these methods using data from 141 uncorrelated fields (~700 arcmin$^2$ total) from Hubble's Brightest of Reionizing Galaxies (BoRG) survey. We use BoRG's broad-band imaging in optical and near infrared to identify N~1000 photometric candidates at z~2 through a combination of colour selection and photometric redshift determination, building a magnitude-limited sample with $m_{AB}\leq24.5$ in F160W. We detect a clear excess in the variance of the galaxy number counts distribution compared to Poisson expectations, from which we estimate a galaxy bias $b \approx 3.63 \pm 0.57$. When divided by SED-fit classification into ~400 early-type and ~600 late-type candidates, we estimate biases of $b_{early} \approx 4.06 \pm 0.67$ and $b_{late} \approx 2.98 \pm 0.98$ respectively. These estimates are consistent with previous measurements of the bias from the two-point correlation function, and demonstrate that with $N\gtrsim100$ sight-lines, each containing $N\gtrsim5$ objects, the counts-in-cell analysis provides a robust measurement of the bias. This implies that the method can be applied effectively to determine clustering properties (and characteristic dark-matter halo masses) of z~6-9 galaxies from a pure-parallel James Webb Space Telescope survey similar in design to Hubble's BoRG survey.
Current browse context:
astro-ph.GA
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.