Computer Science > Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
[Submitted on 10 Dec 2018 (v1), last revised 5 Nov 2019 (this version, v4)]
Title:Accuracy, Uncertainty, and Adaptability of Automatic Myocardial ASL Segmentation using Deep CNN
View PDFAbstract:PURPOSE: To apply deep CNN to the segmentation task in myocardial arterial spin labeled (ASL) perfusion imaging and to develop methods that measure uncertainty and that adapt the CNN model to a specific false positive vs. false negative tradeoff.
METHODS: The Monte Carlo dropout (MCD) U-Net was trained on data from 22 subjects and tested on data from 6 heart transplant recipients. Manual segmentation and regional myocardial blood flow (MBF) were available for comparison. We consider two global uncertainty measures, named Dice Uncertainty and MCD Uncertainty, which were calculated with and without the use of manual segmentation, respectively. Tversky loss function with a hyperparameter $\beta$ was used to adapt the model to a specific false positive vs. false negative tradeoff.
RESULTS: The MCD U-Net achieved Dice coefficient of mean(std) = 0.91(0.04) on the test set. MBF measured using automatic segmentations was highly correlated to that measured using the manual segmentation ($R^2$ = 0.96). Dice Uncertainty and MCD Uncertainty were in good agreement ($R^2$ = 0.64). As $\beta$ increased, the false positive rate systematically decreased and false negative rate systematically increased.
CONCLUSION: We demonstrate the feasibility of deep CNN for automatic segmentation of myocardial ASL, with good accuracy. We also introduce two simple methods for assessing model uncertainty. Finally, we demonstrate the ability to adapt the CNN model to a specific false positive vs. false negative tradeoff. These findings are directly relevant to automatic segmentation in quantitative cardiac MRI and are broadly applicable to automatic segmentation problems in diagnostic imaging.
Submission history
From: Hung Phi Do [view email][v1] Mon, 10 Dec 2018 18:49:32 UTC (1,342 KB)
[v2] Thu, 26 Sep 2019 05:12:54 UTC (2,057 KB)
[v3] Sun, 20 Oct 2019 21:43:22 UTC (2,494 KB)
[v4] Tue, 5 Nov 2019 04:42:31 UTC (2,350 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.