Lauren Donovan Ginsberg
I'm an associate professor at Duke University. My research explores early imperial Roman literature with special focus on drama, epic, and historiography as well as the intersection of poetry and history, cultural memory theory, intertextuality, and narratives of civil war.
My book (Staging Memory, Staging Strife: Empire and Civil War in the Octavia; OUP 2017) examines how the anonymous historical drama, the Octavia, rewrites the memory of the Julio-Claudians and reinterprets the literature produced under that dynasty in light of the family's sudden fall from power and the reemergence of civil war in 69 CE.
I'm also working on a number of smaller projects on Roman drama, epic, intertextuality, and Roman cultural memory especially concerning the age of Nero and the early Flavian period.
My book (Staging Memory, Staging Strife: Empire and Civil War in the Octavia; OUP 2017) examines how the anonymous historical drama, the Octavia, rewrites the memory of the Julio-Claudians and reinterprets the literature produced under that dynasty in light of the family's sudden fall from power and the reemergence of civil war in 69 CE.
I'm also working on a number of smaller projects on Roman drama, epic, intertextuality, and Roman cultural memory especially concerning the age of Nero and the early Flavian period.
less
InterestsView All (44)
Uploads
Papers by Lauren Donovan Ginsberg
In order to rewrite the history of Rome's first imperial dynasty, the Octavia engages with the literature of Julio-Claudian Rome, using the words of Rome's most celebrated authors to stage a new reading of that era and its ruling family. In doing so, the play opens a dialogue about literary versions of history and about the legitimacy of those historical accounts. Through an innovative combination of intertextual analysis and cultural memory theory, Ginsberg contextualizes the roles that literature and the literary manipulation of memory play in negotiating the transition between the Julio-Claudian and Flavian regimes. Her book claims for the Octavia a central role in current debates over both the ways in which Nero and his family were remembered as well as the politics of literary and cultural memory in the early Roman empire.