Starzynka

Perm Krai...

...is done; Primorsky Krai is ready to go. Thanks!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?)

Sorry to hear you can't do these any more. However, thanks much for what you've done thus far. I know I am often grumpy about stubs, but you have helped quite a bit with this particular project. Best wishes,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); October 4, 2010; 13:30 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Exeter monastery

The article Exeter monastery has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Content and context-free stub.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 20:56, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Courtesy note

Hello Starzynka, I have posted a query about your stubs at the BRFA page. This is to keep you informed. Regards. — Ganeshk (talk) 15:22, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

A couple of BAG members have commented that your article creation does need bot approval per bot policy even though they were created by a human editor. I would advise you to please stop creating the town articles and get an approval. The community has decided that any large-scale automated or semi-automated article creation task must be approved at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval. — Ganeshk (talk) 16:00, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Özdemiroğlu Osman Paşa

Hi, Starzynka

The article Özdemiroğlu Osman Pasha already exists in Wikipedia. (with using sh instead of Ş) . happy editting. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 06:01, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Already created articles

Hi, Starzynka

Most of the new articles you have created about Ottoman grand viziers already exist in Wikipedia. Since Paşa is a title the contributers prefer to write the title using English characters. So the names end in Pasha instead of Paşa. Müezzinzade Ali Pasha, Öküz Kara Mehmet Pasha, Kuyucu Murat Pasha, Özdemiroğlu Osman Pasha, Hadım Sinan Pasha, Çandarlı (2nd) Halil Pasha, Karamanlı Mehmet Pasha are some of the articles I have seen. Happy editting. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 06:17, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

I found the following duplicates. There may be even more. I suggest you consult the list of Ottoman grand viziers. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 18:03, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Original	Duplicate
Filibeli Hafız Ahmed Pasha	Müezzinzade Filibeli Hafız Ahmed Paşa
Öküz Kara Mehmed Pasha	Öküz Kara Mehmed Paşa
Kuyucu Murat Pasha	Kuyucu Murat Paşa
Özdemiroğlu Osman Pasha	Özdemiroğlu Osman Paşa
Hadım Sinan Pasha	Hadim Sinan Paşa
Gedik Ahmet Pasha	Gedik Ahmed Paşa
Karamanlı Mehmet Pasha	Karamanlı Mehmed Paşa
Lala Kara Mustafa Pasha	Lala Kara Mustafa Paşa

Your contributed article, Keisri hull

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Keisri hull. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - The Czar's Madman. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at The Czar's Madman - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Quibik (talk) 13:25, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Kirklees Priory

You created a stub Kirklees Priory which I was also thinking of creating. I have expanded it and am nominating it at DYK, so thank you.--J3Mrs (talk) 15:52, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Wilcheswood monastery

The article Wilcheswood monastery has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Context-free stub.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 08:28, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Project templates

If there is a need to place project template to created articles you can also ask me to do that. I can use AWB to do this work.--Александр Мотин (talk) 11:04, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Uus Elu

A tag has been placed on Uus Elu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Sander Säde 09:55, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dit' e re

The article Dit' e re has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
Dit' e re – news, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 05:18, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Starzynka, please first of all allow me to thank you for the great work of initiating all those stubs. Can you please give some more sources on these newspapers? I really don't know if they exist or not. Every newspaper is notable in WP per long time consensus, but if there is no source, what can I do? --Sulmues ^(talk) 23:20, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Communes of Cameroon

I notice that you have done a lot of work on Communes of Cameroon, and on creating stub articles where they did not already exist. I have recently checked through the list, and corrected those links that were pointing to a wrong article. This has resulted in a number (over 20) of red links. Can you point me to the source of the information so I can try and create the missing pages, or otherwise advise? Please reply here. Thanks. Jan1naD ^{(talk • contrib)} 12:37, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I don't think population data is available for the communes.Starzynka (talk) 20:56, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for replying. Not so much population data, even a list of names will do so that I can place it as a reference and stop the article being deleted. Unfortunately, there seem to be no working links on the communes page that can help. Jan1naD ^{(talk • contrib)} 21:04, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Päevaleht (1905)

A tag has been placed on Päevaleht (1905) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Sander Säde 09:45, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

thank you Quibik for the translation. Accotink2 talk 14:59, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of El oficinista

The article El oficinista has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable per WP:BK

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 20:41, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Digital times

The article Digital times has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No info - just one-sentence with no refs to prove notability. I know its Latvian but we need more than this

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 11:55, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

places

Is "Imperial" measure really preferred in those places? Rich Farmbrough, 19:35, 24 October 2010 (UTC).
s

Hello, Starzynka. You have new messages at Accotink2's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	love the added articles Accotink2 talk 19:51, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Starzynka. You have new messages at Htonl's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

An article you started is being discussed

You are invited to join the discussion at WT:N#What is the consensus on City articles?. patsw (talk) 01:07, 29 October 2010 (UTC) (Using {{Please see}})

Chinese Places with labour camps

Hi Starzynka,

Thank you for your work. The List of Re-education Through Labor camps in China has red links to places, and also places without even a redlink. I suggest you to write articles on them, in which you mention the labour camp. Yours sincerely Sarcelles (talk) 13:59, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Administrators' Noticeboard

Just a quick note to let you know that another editor has raised a concern about your editing at the Administrators' Noticeboard. —DoRD (talk) 01:03, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, but my editing future is on a thin line here if this bullying continues. I will try to find source but all my stubs are encyclopedic and can be expand.Starzynka (talk) 10:42, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

I suggest that while your stub creations are under discussion a AN, you refrain from continuing to create them. - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 11:41, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Stop wasting time.Starzynka (talk) 11:44, 30 October 2010 (UTC)