Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                


Predicted year for the start of widespread use of the IPv6 Internet Protocol."

edit

Can someone please explain this one to me? Captain Jackson 06:32, 9 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Unsourced and not credible. Deleting this patent nonsense. Moving other nonsense to fiction. CP/M comm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 16:45, 2 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

India's Gas

edit

is it gas or gas? or something else? BillPP 23:45, 17 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Russians and the Moon

edit

What about the Russians wanting to land a man on the moon by 2025? - .:. Jigsy .:. 22:17, 22 September 2007 (UTC)Reply


Russian economy

edit

Russia may become the largest consumer market in Europe and the 4th largest in the world by 2025, according to the latest data from the market research firm, Nielsen.

Can someone add this link as the reference? http://www.russiatoday.ru/business/news/16471/video

-G —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.117.158.83 (talk) 03:34, 6 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Inauguration

edit

The inauguration is this year, but also the first year that MLK day will be on the same day as the inauguration, which is a federal holiday. What has higher priority?? 96.248.98.212 (talk) 23:59, 4 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Actually, according to the Wikipedia page concerning the United States presidential inauguration, if January 20 falls on a Sunday of an inauguration year, then the public inauguration takes place on the following Monday (a private inauguration having taken place on the proper day). So this will be a problem only two years from now, when January 20, 2013 falls on a Sunday and thus the address would be made on January 21, which is MLK Jr. Day.
However, this is not a problem that has not been faced before. Bill Clinton's second inauguration, in 1997, also happened to fall on MLK Jr. Day. They did not reschedule the inauguration, so to answer your question, the presidential inauguration has a higher priority. SheaF91 (talk) 07:40, 11 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2025. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:44, 2 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Eclipses

edit

See WT:YEARS#Eclipses for a matter relevant to this page. Arthur Rubin (alternate) (talk) 23:08, 26 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Paramount Pictures Corporation distributed 20th Century Studios films

edit

After the success of ‘’Beauty and the Beast’’ and ‘’The Lion King’’, Paramount Pictures Corporation will later be distributed 20th Century Studios films that, young children got one last choice to see new films produced by 20th Century Studios in 2025, both live-action and computer-animation to later be distributed by Paramount Pictures Corporation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.147.18.244 (talk) 15:56, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

The keys of St. Peter open the door again in 2025.

edit

There will be a Holy Jubilee of the global Catholic Church throughout the year of 2025, with plenary forgiving of sins for the faithful and the Shroud of Turin is scheduled to go on public display again. This is a notable future event for 1.2+ billion people: https://www.giubileo-2025.it/en 158.88.16.4 (talk) 11:38, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Date format

edit

I would like to suggest changing the date format of this article to the DMY format (e.g. 6 June 2020 as opposed to June 6, 2020). The DMY format seems more international and more suitable for a "global" article like. Also DMY simply makes more sense as it goes from smallest to highest.

At the village pump, I've presented a proposal to establish a standard to use DMY in general for all articles about "generic" years. The discussion got kind of messy however, and I'll propaly restart it at some point. In the meantime, I would like it to create consensus about changing 2025 specifically as well as all other nine articles about the 2020s to the DMY format.--Marginataen (talk) 08:42, 5 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

I'm pasting the same reply at all the 2020s talk page sections on this topic, with the exception of 2023. As of about a month ago, we had a situation in which all generic year articles had a consistent date format. Since both date styles are considered appropriate per the Manual of Style, it's unusual to see such solid consistency. Since I value consistency, I appreciated that rare situation.
As of last month, only 2023 was changed via local consensus to be different than the rest. If this proposal passes for this article, it would join a tiny minority of articles that do not match the overall consistent style. I oppose for that reason.
I would be fine with all generic year articles changing to consistently use a different style, and that is the proposal on the table at WP:VPR#Date format for year articles. Currently, it seems we're at the tail end of a pre-RfC discussion with plans to move forward with an RfC in the next week or so. I would much prefer to keep discussing the overarching change rather than have individual discussions at each year article. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:07, 5 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Remove Parole Eligibility for Yolanda Saldivar?

edit

Compared to everything else already in the article (eg: elections, leadership tenure ending, multinational sporting events, etc), the parole eligibility point for it doesn't seem to be important enough for inclusion. I think it's better suited for a different place, like a music article or elsewhere. Just a suggestion. Losipov (talk) 21:14, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

It is not notable at all and should not be here. We don't cover the release of notable inmates like OJ Simpson in 2017 or Bill Cosby in 2021 and these were releases. In OJs case he served his time while Cosby's sentence was vacated. In this case we are talking about parole, which is supervised release while still serving your sentence and this is just where she is merely eligible for parole. There is zero notability here whatsoever and is better featured in an article about this year in music. PaulRKil (talk) 20:51, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Artemis II

edit

Could someone please add the Artemis II mission to the list of events. It is currently scheduled to launch no earlier than September 2025. Artemis III is listed on the 2026 page for reference. 96.86.71.225 (talk) 15:08, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'll look into it, I think Artemis III is included only because it involves humans landing on the moon while II doesn't. PaulRKil (talk) 16:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
That makes sense. I would say what makes Artemis II significant is that it will be the first time humans go beyond LEO in over 50 years. 96.86.71.225 (talk) 13:46, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Grand Theft Auto VI

edit

Grand Theft Auto VI will probably release in January or February 2025 (Q1 2025).

It was found on game news sources, social medias and more.

It probably may be delayed in the future Zona Gg (talk) 13:17, 18 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

British reginal year is empty--Needs update

edit

I noticed that the British reginal year is listed as 'N/A.' There should be a correction or update due to this becoming the 2nd or 3rd year of King Charles the 3rd. I'm not British so I don't know if you count it from when the monarch automatically ascended or when he/she is formally coronated. Rpsenft (talk) 02:22, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Can someone add 2025 Solar storm?

edit

And yep PlutoPlanet4345 (talk) 17:00, 6 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Do you have a reference? Knitsey (talk) 17:10, 6 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Knitsey Yes PlutoPlanet4345 (talk) 17:17, 6 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Its taken me ages to open the article as it's so ad heavy. The article states could, not will as you wrote. It also seems to say this has been revised to peak up to October 2024. Knitsey (talk) 17:25, 6 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
I've taken a look at the about section for the website and it's owned by the conglomerate that owns Times of India which Wikipedia classes as 'generally unreliable' BUT it might be that the website is OK to use. I can't assess that. WP:RSP Knitsey (talk) 17:31, 6 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
No. You’ve made this edit before completely unsourced and have been told on other accounts to stop. PaulRKil (talk) 12:56, 9 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Microsoft Ending Support for Windows 10

edit

Why are people so insistent on adding this into the article?

We dont include the discontinuation of more notable operating systems such as XP. To me, it reads more like news about the routine discontinuation of an operating system which isn’t the purpose of Wikipedia.

We should Exclude it. PaulRKil (talk) 15:47, 7 August 2024 (UTC)Reply