This article was nominated for deletion on 27 November 2018. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Bangladeshi English be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. Wikipedians in Bangladesh may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
This article is written in Bangladeshi English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analyse, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Deletion reason
edituncensored and original research article- provided 2 sources are entirely topic unrelated −2A0A:A540:EF2C:0:206E:AE1E:B106:F48B (talk) 18:25, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
- @2A0A:A540:EF2C:0:206E:AE1E:B106:F48B Oh really??? How is it? BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 17:41, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
west bengal
editaddition of West Bengal in the article. ❯❯❯ S A H A 15:48, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
is it not called "bengali english"?
editIs it really called "Bangladeshi English?" Iljhgtn (talk) 13:19, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Iljhgtn Yes it is! BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 17:37, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
"Accent"
edit@Jonesey95, seems incorrect this is an accent as that is only about pronunciation. It was changed from "variety" (with the same sources) to "accent" in this edit by an ip but no change in sourcing. The two sources were added in this earlier edit alongside "variety". Nonetheless changed it to "accent" for consistency, if you're saying those sources state such. DankJae 18:57, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Fair enough. You can change it back if you want to. I was just restoring it to the way it was for a while, since I did not see any change in sourcing. I looked for those two sources and was unable to access either of them on-line to see what they actually say. The lead of this article has changed quite a bit, IMO for the worse, in the past few years. It used to be at least implied in the lead that Banglish was more of a patois or combination dialect than a variety of standard English that could be useful here on Wikipedia. We have ended up with the misleading {{Use Bangladeshi English}} template, one of many discussed recently at Template talk:EngvarB. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:02, 7 December 2024 (UTC)