Talk:JibJab
Latest comment: 9 months ago by LTaccs in topic Bring back the detailed year in review articles
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the JibJab article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
legal trouble even possible
editRE: CNN article about attempted legal action (This Land)
How is legal trouble even possible? Copyright laws specifically allow parody. -Branddobbe 23:59, Jan 17, 2005 (UTC)
- Also, isn't calling Clinton a "male chauvnist pig," POV? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.125.69.225 (talk • contribs)
- Easy. You can sue anybody you want. That doesn't mean the case doesn't get dismissed. It's pretty ridiculous that they decided to settle, but that just goes to show that the American way is that even if you are completely in the wrong, you can still threaten a lawsuit and instantly cause enough damage to your opponent (who is totally in the right) that the financially smart thing to do is to give you money for it. It's legalized thievery, and IP owners are making this a routine part of their business model. Sickening. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.1.1.33 (talk • contribs)
Bring back the detailed year in review articles
editPlease undo the revision where the detailed links to every reference of year in review were removed, because anyone reading the article will probably not understand what happened that year without proper context LTaccs (talk) 04:17, 23 January 2024 (UTC)