This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horse racing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Horse racing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Horse racingWikipedia:WikiProject Horse racingTemplate:WikiProject Horse racingHorse racing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Equine, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of articles relating to horses, asses, zebras, hybrids, equine health, equine sports, etc. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at the barn.EquineWikipedia:WikiProject EquineTemplate:WikiProject Equineequine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
One is listed as Merseyside and the other as Lancashire. As both fall within the so-called 'metropolitan county' of Merseyside area either list both as being within Merseyside or both as within Lancashire. The present list is not consistent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.194.15.94 (talk) 23:44, 12 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Some anonymous editor has reverted my change to the club's history, for which I provided two solid references. If some anonymous editor thinks those references are incorrect, some anonymous editor is welcome to provide better ones, but not to simply revert the change as if it were vandalism. Languagehat (talk) 18:07, 19 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
Language Hat, my changes were not meant to be anonymous. I was simply not logged in as I'm using a new iPad. Apologies! However, The Jockey Club's history is not just something you can pile into like this based on a historical pamphlet that may or may not be valid. Books are written all the time suggesting alternative histories - does that mean they are more accurate than the history in The Jockey Club's own archives? If you contacted them you would find out that they are happy they were founded in 1750. I am returning the dates to the right place. You call my changes vandalism (I significantly improved the links on the page by the way and corrected other inaccuracies) but I suggest changing the history of one of the oldest clubs in England is vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.25.213.127 (talk) 19:04, 19 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
