Talk:Knox Supergroup

Geology Mid‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Knox Supergroup is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mining Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merger discussion

Latest comment: 2 months ago4 comments4 people in discussion

I propose merging to the "Knox Dolomite" to the "Knox Supergroup"~~ for the following reasons. 1) "Knox Dolomite" is part of the Knox Supergroup and is not even the proper nomenclature for the rock unit being described. 2) The body of this article was a copy and paste from another article by the same author, this is evident because it is describing the "Kerbal Formation" formation not the "Knox Dolomite" 3) There are no valid references for this article. Zigismon (talk) 20:16, 30 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

I disagree, 1) that same rational could be extended to virtually any formation article that is part of a group 2) that could and has been easily be fixed 3) the same could be said for all formation articles that almost solely rely on fossilworks/palaeodb (often broken or outdated). Lavalizard101 (talk) 10:53, 2 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Merge no valid references for this article. Allan Nonymous (talk) 20:51, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Merge would be the ideal result. Doesn't need a duplicate article with virutally no content. scope_creep^Talk 14:17, 3 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic