Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Talk:Martin O'Donnell

Latest comment: 6 months ago by AngusWOOF in topic Infobox discussion
Good articleMartin O'Donnell has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 10, 2008Good article nomineeListed
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Martin O'Donnell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:49, 4 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Martin O'Donnell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:49, 12 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Martin O'Donnell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:46, 16 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Martin O'Donnell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:14, 24 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Infobox discussion

edit

Hey, there. Lately, there has been some infobox changes I would like to address here.

When I raised up the usage of the education and alma mater parameters on Template talk:Infobox person#Education and alma mater parameters back in December 2023, there was no evidence the alma mater is deprecated and either the "education" or "alma mater" parameter can be used. The relevant guidelines on WP:INFOBOXPURPOSE state "The less information it contains, the more effectively it serves that purpose, allowing readers to identify key facts at a glance." In addition, the subject of the article is not a politician so the Template:Infobox politician template is unneeded.

I personally don't see a problem with using either the education or alma mater infobox parameters, but rather than reverting, I thought I would open the discussion first per WP:BRD. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 17:33, 3 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

I agree with keeping the infobox as {{infobox person}} as his political career is a) not what he's known for and b) doesn't exactly exist outside of a candidacy right now anyhow. I don't have an opinion on the education parameter, other than to say it's not really a major facet of the article so I don't see the pressing need for it in in the infobox either. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 18:44, 3 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
I see. For now, I removed the education parameter altogether pending additional feedback. Also, for the political party parameter in the infobox, should we keep it or remove it? Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 01:53, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Given he's running for political office, at the moment it's probably germane. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 11:31, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
I agree with David on both counts. With respect to the education/alma mater parameter, I think you misunderstood what what Thereq is saying. The infobox instructions indicate to use 'alma mater' when only the highest/most recent institution is listed and to use 'education' when the full training history is listed. Since both Wheaton College and USC are listed, 'education' is preferred. Axem Titanium (talk) 17:20, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Here's the template documentation for reference:
|education=

Education, e.g., degree, institution and graduation year, if relevant. If very little information is available or relevant, the |alma_mater= parameter may be more appropriate.

|alma mater=

Alma mater. This parameter is a more concise alternative to (not addition to) |education=, and will often consist of the linked name of the last-attended institution of higher education (not secondary schools). It is usually not relevant to include either parameter for non-graduates, but article talk page consensus may conclude otherwise, as perhaps at Bill Gates.

Of course, some articles have used either alma mater for most actors and entertainers, or education when their profession is more academic in nature (i.e. Ken Jeong, who has an MD). Also, as what Erik (talk · contribs) pointed out to me in this discussion, it all depends on the individual: for some actors, we only know where they went to school and nothing more, and "alma mater" would be appropriate, but for actors who are very famous, details of their academic background would probably be identified and "education" can be used.
For a video game example, the Nobuo Uematsu article (a GA) lists Kanagawa University as his alma mater since it's the only university he graduated from. However, in the case of this article, O'Donnell graduated from two universities: Wheaton College and the University of Southern California. Given that, we can use education for the latter if needed. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 23:46, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
If he uses the infobox musical artist as the main infobox, then education won't be listed unless it's set up like Dexter Holland as a module. AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 17:52, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply