This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Untitled
editWikified as part of the wikification drive. However, not all of the article makes sense, especially the last sentence. Removed wikify tag abd added cleanup tag. KarenAnn 15:02, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Tibet?
editThat last is Tibetan, I guess? Strange to give a transliteration from Tibetan without showing the Tibetan script, particularly when the article nowhere mentions Tibet otherwise. I'm gonna take it out; as it is, it misleadingly suggests that klu'i rgyal po is an alternate transliteration of नागराज. —Tamfang (talk) 19:22, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Why you deleted
editread the book then talk Mohit atulkar (talk) 11:31, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, after 5 edits you ended up with the below. Johnbod (talk) 12:22, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello this is nagraja he is king sheshnaag of vidisha ==
He is a king of nagvansh he is a nagvanshi raja his name is sesnag please improve your information Mohit atulkar (talk) 01:04, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Historical Sources
- Mahavamsa and Lalitavistara – Buddhist texts
- Excavation of Ahar – Sankalia
- History of Rajputana – Gaurishankar Jha
- Buddhist India – David Rhys
- Early Stone Sculpture of Mathura – Sonya Rhie Mohit atulkar (talk) 01:04, 18 June 2024 (UTC)