Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Talk:Neil Druckmann/GA1

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Anarchyte in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Anarchyte (talk · contribs) 10:27, 26 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

I'll review this now. --Anarchyte 10:27, 26 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Comments and Feedback

edit
This shouldn't be a worry as most of the 'violations' are the words "The Last of Us: Left Behind" and "The Last of Us".

Lead

edit
  • Everything is fine here, covers all the points said in the article (as far as I can see)  

Early life

edit
  • Everything is fine here  

Career

edit
  • Druckmann met Naughty Dog co-founder Jason Rubin at the Game Developers Conference, when they began talking. In 2004, Druckmann joined Naughty Dog as a programming intern, before being promoted to a full-time position as a gameplay programmer a few months later.<ref name="Creative"/>
Hmm... Maybe this could be reworded in a way? Something like:
"At the Game Developers Conference, Druckmann met Naughty Dog co-founder Jason Rubin. After Druckmann "bugged" Rubin, Rubin gave him his business card. In 2004, Druckmann joined Naughty Dog as a programming intern, before being promoted to a full-time position as a gameplay programmer a few months later.<ref name="Creative"/>"
EDIT: Page has since been edited.

Personal life

edit
  • Everything is fine here  

Works

edit
  • Everything is fine here  

Awards and nominations

edit
  • Everything is fine here  

GA Criteria

edit

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:  
    B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
    Reviewer Comment: A few good faith edits and test edits were done but they soon ended.
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:   (Pass)

Another good article on subjects of The Last of Us, good job. :)
Anyway, all the files used in the article are under the creative commons so they're fine to use, there's no violation of WP:BLP and everything seems to be in order. The only issue I found has been stated above and it's really not that big of a deal. Promoted to GA.   --Anarchyte 11:06, 26 June 2015 (UTC)Reply