Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Talk:Ontario Highway 58

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Dr. Blofeld in topic GA Review
Good articleOntario Highway 58 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 13, 2016Good article nomineeListed

Orphaned references in Ontario Highway 58

edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Ontario Highway 58's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "gmaps":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 01:09, 16 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Ontario Highway 58/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 22:21, 2 January 2016 (UTC)Reply


Lede
  • "The southern segment travels from Niagara Regional Road 3, formerly Highway 3, in Port Colborne, to the Highway 58A junction in the southern end of Welland, a distance of 7.2 km (4.5 mi); the northern segment begins at Highway 20 near Allanburg and travels north and west to a large junction with Highway 406 at the St. Catharines – Thorold boundary, a distance of 8.3 km (5.2 mi). " -too long. New sentence before the northern segment is fine.
  • Isn't "travelled" a British English spelling?
Description
  • "the route passes beneath a railway" -can you be more specific on the railway?
Downloading
  • "Budget constraints brought on by a recession in the 1990s resulted in the Mike Harris provincial government forming the Who Does What? committee to" -when was this?
Table
  • Do you intend clearing those red links in the table?

Dr. Blofeld 22:31, 2 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

My apologies, I don't believe I received a notice that the GAN had begun. I've made fixes as noted above. - Floydian τ ¢ 19:54, 28 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Dr. Blofeld: Making sure you've seen this. --Rschen7754 18:09, 7 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, the ping didn't work! I did check in on this for a few weeks but left it when it seemed the writer wasn't coming back! Thanks for addressing!♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:48, 13 February 2016 (UTC)Reply


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  Dr. Blofeld 16:48, 13 February 2016 (UTC)Reply