Talk:Requiem (Jenkins)
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Favonian in topic Requested move
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved per request. The reference to WP:NCM carries the day, but please enlighten me: what does WP:NBC have to do with it? Favonian (talk) 22:31, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
Requiem (Karl Jenkins) → Requiem (Jenkins) – per WP:NCM, Requiem (Jenkins) should be main title of the article about the work instead of redirecting to the associated Album. FordPrefect42 (talk) 16:36, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Jenkins is not a mononymic great composer widely known by surname, it should contain his name, instead of an ambiguous surname. Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(music) suggests "Requiem (Karl Jenkins composition)" or something.-- 76.65.128.43 (talk) 05:43, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- I beg your pardon? WP:NBC is quite clear: "If the name of the piece is shared by another piece or pieces, include the composer's surname in parentheses following the name of the piece." There is nothing in WP:NBC that would suggest a title like "Requiem (Karl Jenkins composition)". BTW, how many requiems are there by a composer named Jenkins (see [1])? --FordPrefect42 (talk) 23:46, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.