This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I changed the page back to how it was September 15 2006. Whoever is writing all this libel should quit it.
I'm astonished to see that there is not only no 'Discussion' of Rex Murphy here but no 'History' of one either. Surely the "I" (above) who has taken it upon him/herself to expunge the missing data would be more at home as a censor in a totalitarian regime than as a participant in the information age. It is extremely doubtful that Mr. Murphy, a public figure and ever-willing polemicist, is much concerned about being 'libelled' by any opinion expressed here. In any event, it would have been nice to be able to make up our own minds about the merits of the suppressed views.
I don't think the previous text was technicaly libellous from a legal point of view. It was removed because numerous contributors were making very unkind and possibly slanderous speculations that he was either drunk or mentally retarded or phyically handicapped. His accent has nothing to do with any disability whatsoever. Rex is an extremely intelligent person who simply speaks with a regional accent from Newfoundland and Labrador. Case closed. Mardiste (talk) 19:27, 3 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
@Newf1990: Per MOS:INFONAT, the field is used to list someone's nationality if it has changed after their birth. Newfoundland joined Canada in 1949, and all its citizens became Canadian, including Rex Murphy. The field thus lists his nationality as Canadian. Do you have a reason or source for repeatedly changing it to "Newfoundlander"? Yeeno (talk) 21:21, 9 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
I have provided an explanation for Murphy's status as a natural born Canadian citizen after Newfoundland joined Canada, with cites to the Terms of Union and a related federal statute. I believe that explanation is consistent with MOS:INFONAT. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 23:13, 10 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
