Talk:Romano Guardini

Untitled

I've just expanded and "unstubbed" the article. I'll leave the new rating to wiser heads.--Paularblaster 21:32, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Romano Guardini/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

I've just expanded and unstubbed the article on Romano Guardini. I'll leave the new rating to wiser heads. --Paularblaster 21:31, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Last edited at 21:31, 28 October 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 04:50, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Romano Guardini. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071201044256/http://www.conservativeclassics.com/books/Dissidentbk/book3.pdf to http://www.conservativeclassics.com/books/Dissidentbk/book3.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:08, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Romano Guardini. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060211034603/http://fdlc.org/Liturgy_Resources/Guardini/Chapter1.htm to http://fdlc.org/Liturgy_Resources/Guardini/Chapter1.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:37, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Works and Bibliography

The article has these two sections called "Works" and "Bibliography". Are these really intended to separate Guardini's works into those published in English translation and those in the German original? If so, should this section be titled accordingly? BobKilcoyne (talk) 06:51, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

What does being titled accordingly look like? Raulois (talk) 20:02, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

If the distinction I am asking about is correct then the titles could be "Works in English" and "Works in German". BobKilcoyne (talk) 04:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

I think “Works in English” is applicable, but I would leave the Bibliography section alone. Raulois (talk) 20:00, 21 November 2024 (UTC)