Talk:Texas Recreational Road 2

Texas Recreational Road 2 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 21, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
February 19, 2013	Good article reassessment	Delisted
April 11, 2013	Good article nominee	Not listed
August 16, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed
Current status: Good article

U.S. Roads: State highways / Texas Low‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. state highways
Locations	Texas
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

United States: Texas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Texas Recreational Road 2/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 00:36, 21 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:
Quality of the article is good.

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Article complies with MoS.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:
Good.

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
References support all statements included in the article.

C. No original research:
No original research found.
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
All major aspects of the topic have been covered.

B. Focused:
Article remains focused throughout.
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
No bias found.
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Article is stable.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
Image is tagged correctly.

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Appropriate image is used with a suitable caption.
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Pass!--Dom497 (talk) 00:55, 21 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Comments

Nothing needs to be fixed on the nominators part. I have fixed the minor issues within the the article.--Dom497 (talk) 00:55, 21 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Texas Recreational Road 2/GA3. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Neonblak (talk · contribs) 11:26, 16 August 2013 (UTC) I will be reviewing this nomination. Seems to have been delisted, although there is no information posted as to why.Neonblak ^talk - 11:26, 16 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Review There are no disambiguation, or external link issues. The photos used appear to be compliant with WP guidelines. All links appear to be formatted correctly. I saw only very minor issues, they are listed below:

Lead

1. Since you already abreviated Recreational Road 2 to RE2, no need to revert back to it full name in the last line of the lead.

History

1. " By 1961, the road had been improved to a metal surface..." - I would change "the road" to "it", since the word combo was used in the previous sentence, reads slightly clunky.

Thats it, that's all I saw, so I will put this on hold, and look forward to passing this article.Neonblak ^talk - 11:46, 16 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

I have addressed your concerns. Thanks for the review. Its been forever since I nominated it. And just for clarification, the first time this was listed it was about 4 kb in length. After a long discussion, it was merged. After some research, I was able to expand it out into its current appearance. Thanks again for the review, - Awardgive. Help out with Project Fillmore County 18:30, 16 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic