![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm wondering if there should be a separate article created on the Orgy® format. Perhaps it could also be used to document all the Orgies® that have been produced? --Kit 21:16, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
- There have been dozens of Orgies® every year for decades. Compiling the list would probably require going through a lot of old program guides, many of which will be in paper form only. I doubt it's practical. Uucp 00:55, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- Many things in life aren't practical, but as a historical record, I'd think it'd be quite useful. I don't even know how far our program guide records go. But part of the usefulness would be in freeing the information from its paper form. Having just finished producing another orgy today, it's on my mind. (-: --Kit 01:30, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- Such a compilation may be of interest, but I don't think that this is the place to put it. It probably falls under Things Wikipedia is Not. Uucp 01:47, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- It could, of course, go on the WHRB wiki itself, which would make a great deal of sense. There is a list lying around somewheres.--Sammermpc 04:34, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- Such a compilation may be of interest, but I don't think that this is the place to put it. It probably falls under Things Wikipedia is Not. Uucp 01:47, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Orgy as registered mark
editReally, the Romans were having them. What gives? Anyway, even the WHRB's own web page (http://www.whrb.org/site.php?section=Orgies) only has Orgy registered, and not Orgies etc. I'd suggest doing this, though I disapprove of the copyright megalomania that is implied in registering a commonly used noun in a not particularly unusual context. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Motmot (talk • contribs) 11:30, 15 August 2007 (UTC)