Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Over the past few days, early 2021, I had a disagreement with User:Newimpartial about ... an unrelated subject. But I see they edit Roleplaying game articles! And I haven't done one for a while, though it was what I started here with. So I'm hoping we can find one to cooperate on, to smooth over any hard feelings, and per the note at the top of my user page.

So, here's what the Wikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing games "Requested articles" box looks like today (16:36, 3 February 2021 (UTC)). Let's do a preliminary source search for each, to see what is likely to make for the best article, just the first few pages of search engine results; then we'll pick the best one from what we have. The list will still be useful if we like what happened to the first we picked and want to do a second!

<=== My comment here is that, correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't really think the distinction between "the RPG" and "the parody" holds up to scrutiny. While published by an RPG publisher and winning an award as an RPG supplement, I would see this as a "game supplement" in the same sense that The Glorantha Sourcebook (which also deserves an article BTW) is a "game supplement": both are works of imaginative subcreation that were created in derivation from, but independent of, the RPG setting in question. Newimpartial (talk) 19:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

<=== Somehow I've lost track of the state of Delta Green articles, but Countdown deserves dedicated treatment (as a section or an article) and met with independent reviews (it had to, or I wouldn't have bought it :p). I would also like to see Pagan's Golden Dawn book for CoC discussed somewhere, since it seems to have disappeared into the ether (and hasn't been revived as Delta Green has). Newimpartial (talk) 19:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)