CaptainEek
| This is CaptainEek's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
Editor Feedback, Talk, and Sea Shanty Singing Area
All Hands on Deck! There's conversation to be had with other editors!
Question from 3ZVOSVOCBOE6028 (02:03, 19 June 2024)
editHey so I am writing a draft article about Maksymil'yanivka, Pokrovsk Raion, Donetsk Oblast and I need to find references for information I want to add about it. Do you know how i could find some information about it? for example population pre war or something like that.Get back to me if and when you can, thanks! --3ZVOSVOCBOE6028 (talk) 02:03, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- @3ZVOSVOCBOE6028 Gosh, I don't really know. You should try asking at WP:Wikiproject Ukraine. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:51, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Translating of articles
editI was going to translate an article from Bengali Wikipedia to english. The references used in bn wiki are from Bengali language journal or website.should i have to look out for English articles or use those references from bn wiki.
--kemel49(connect)(contri) 21:37, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- @KEmel49 You can use non-english language sources, though it can be helpful to provide translations in the footnotes. And if you can find English language sources to supplement that will help. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- @CaptainEek, what if i use
{{cite web}}template's language parameter.i was thinking about that but the problem is that the source will still remains as it is
--kemel49(connect)(contri) 21:45, 21 June 2024 (UTC)- @KEmel49 Yeah thats fine. What I meant was you can use the quote parameter to provide a translated quote from the source. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:50, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Shall try this.Thanks captain ⛵
--kemel49(connect)(contri) 21:52, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Shall try this.Thanks captain ⛵
- @KEmel49 Yeah thats fine. What I meant was you can use the quote parameter to provide a translated quote from the source. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:50, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- @CaptainEek, what if i use
WikiCup 2024 July newsletter
editThe third round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 June. As with Round 2, this round was competitive: each of the 16 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 256 points.
The following editors all scored more than 400 points in Round 3:
Generalissima (submissions) with 1,059 points, mostly from 1 featured article on DeLancey W. Gill, 11 good articles, 18 did you know nominations, and dozens of reviews;
Skyshifter (submissions) with 673 points, mostly from 2 featured articles on Worlds (Porter Robinson album) and I'm God, 5 good articles, and 2 did you know nominations;
Sammi Brie (submissions) with 557 points, mostly from 1 featured article on KNXV-TV, 5 good articles, and 8 did you know nominations; and
AryKun (submissions) with 415 points, mostly from 1 featured article on Great cuckoo-dove, with a high number of bonus points from that article.
The full scores for round 3 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 28 featured articles, 38 featured lists, 240 good articles, 92 in the news credits, and at least 285 did you know credits. They have conducted 279 featured article reviews, as well as 492 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 22 articles to featured topics and good topics.
Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed during Round 4, which starts on 1 July at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.
If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:29, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red July 2024
edit
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:26, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Administrators' newsletter – July 2024
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2024).
Administrator changes
Technical news
- Local administrators can now add new links to the bottom of the site Tools menu without using JavaScript. Documentation is available on MediaWiki. (T6086)
Miscellaneous
- The Community Wishlist is re-opening on 15 July 2024. Read more
Question from TheAuditor20 (10:51, 12 July 2024)
editHi there, I’ve created a new draft for brimsdown fc. I’m waiting for it to be approved and was hoping it could be checked if it meets the criteria and would like the page redirected to the new page. --TheAuditor20 (talk) 10:51, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
WPTC
editIt took me a minute or so to decipher "WPTC" in this comment about the Historical elections motion. Even for those who do get what it means straight away, a link to Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/WikiProject Tropical Cyclones so memories can be refreshed would be handy. Thryduulf (talk) 22:54, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Thryduulf Will do, thanks for pointing that out. So easy to become lost in the acronym sauce, as it were. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 22:55, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, got a user adding misinformation
editOn the Monsterverse page, they keep removing names of confirmed known characters and adding a confirmed nonexistent character to the entry for Godzilla King of the Monsters. just want some help keeping information accurate there. Lindenhs (talk) 23:19, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Lindenhs Hi! Glad to see you editing Wikipedia. So my first question here is can you link to the source you're referring to? We rely on reliable published sources to back up our articles. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 23:23, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Trying to get a public one but I regularly talk with people officially involved with the MV, the characters that keep getting removed were confirmed onscreen in multiple films and by Legendary a few times.
- The nonexistent character is Sargon who has never been seen or referenced ever and was confirmed by the comic/novel writer for the MV Greg Keyes not to exist in a private chat I got permission to share. Here:
- https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/f6fc77d3-a4c8-4df5-bafe-bebf68ae3090/scale-to-width/755
- I am aware this isn’t the ideal way to do it, and as said I’m trying to get a more public statement from them. However the evidence is there as all other Titans in KOTM have on screen sources unless they are novel or comic exclusives.
- If you need more then say so from me I will try getting a better source. Lindenhs (talk) 23:32, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Lindenhs Well I certainly applaud your networking skills for connecting with Mr. Keyes. But a text chat is what we call original research, which is generally disallowed. The issue is it has no publisher, so a reader can't easily verify if its true for themselves. But the Newsweek article at [1] does mention Sargon. Now, there might be a nuance here that I'm missing, perhaps there's a reason why its included in the Newsweek article that could be clarified in our article? CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 23:37, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- It was a joke on Bloody Disgusting that Newsweek copy pasted.
- the joke was “Titanus Sargon in Mexico” as a reference to Sargon of Akkad aka Carl Benjamin a racist/sexist YouTuber and later politician who threatened to take over Mexico and was jokingly called Sargon of Mexico.
- It’s literally just that.
- Carl Benjamin Lindenhs (talk) 23:45, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- I did make a public post to see if I can get a public direct comment on it however and if I get a reply I’ll link it if that works? Lindenhs (talk) 23:48, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hey can you please talk to the user who keeps undoing the edit and removing the confirmed characters? Lindenhs (talk) 18:59, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- I've been keeping an eye on the talk page. Things seem to be productive so far. Wikipedia follows a model called bold revert discuss. We want people to be bold and change and improve the encyclopedia. But if someone makes a change, and someone else disagrees with it, the change can be reverted. The person who made the change in the first place is not entitled to revert that reversion. Instead, the article stays in the status quo ante version, while both parties discuss the merits of the issue. You're currently in the merits of the issue portion of the discussion. You should keep engaging on the talk page. While your claim appears to have some merit as to the missing characters, the other editor is pointing out that you'll need a better source to prove that Sargon isn't in the monsterverse. Please don't change the text of the article until you've come to a conclusion on the talk page. If you reach an impasse let me know and we can go from there. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:31, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Lindenhs forgot to ping you. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:32, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- I’m apparently about to get banned… Lindenhs (talk) 19:35, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- I sent some links on the talk page directly from the film… but if trying to update information to be up to date with information that’s been available for 10 years now and debunks those old articles is apparently a ban offense I don’t see the point.
- btw I’m an admin on one of the Godzilla wikis, this information can be corroborated by both existing Godzilla wikis. Lindenhs (talk) 19:37, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Probably getting banned soon so oh well.. at least I tried I guess. Lindenhs (talk) 19:40, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Well you won't get banned if you just stop edit warring. Perhaps your wiki works different than ours, but here, you don't edit back and forth. You talk it out. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:44, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- We also don’t allow it, but I did try talking it out and sent multiple sources, screenshots, etc but they didn’t listen.
- both on their talk page and mine.
- the information on these characters is available from legendary on twitter (which I don’t have so can’t provide links) and Instagram, as well as official material like the novels and comics.
- like Mokele has multiple chapters dedicated to his rampage in KOTM including a complete description of him. Lindenhs (talk) 19:52, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- If I’m able to get one of the people I’m friends with who work with Legendary to confirm any information in anyway that’s public even as a comment on a post I make, would that count? Lindenhs (talk) 19:58, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Lindenhs I have a several hour meeting I have to go to right now but if you can hold off from making more edits or getting yourself trouble I will try to be helpful about this in a few hours. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 20:00, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Cause I can provide a few of those now?
- Like Dougherty in the pinned comment here talking about Orochi.
- https://www.instagram.com/p/CQ9r6MQM_xrmgBz2_6LDWiTLkMcAJp6aN5j-Bg0/?igsh=eWFndW43ZzFpNWh1 Lindenhs (talk) 20:00, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- If I’m able to get one of the people I’m friends with who work with Legendary to confirm any information in anyway that’s public even as a comment on a post I make, would that count? Lindenhs (talk) 19:58, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Well you won't get banned if you just stop edit warring. Perhaps your wiki works different than ours, but here, you don't edit back and forth. You talk it out. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:44, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Probably getting banned soon so oh well.. at least I tried I guess. Lindenhs (talk) 19:40, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- I’m apparently about to get banned… Lindenhs (talk) 19:35, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Lindenhs forgot to ping you. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:32, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- I've been keeping an eye on the talk page. Things seem to be productive so far. Wikipedia follows a model called bold revert discuss. We want people to be bold and change and improve the encyclopedia. But if someone makes a change, and someone else disagrees with it, the change can be reverted. The person who made the change in the first place is not entitled to revert that reversion. Instead, the article stays in the status quo ante version, while both parties discuss the merits of the issue. You're currently in the merits of the issue portion of the discussion. You should keep engaging on the talk page. While your claim appears to have some merit as to the missing characters, the other editor is pointing out that you'll need a better source to prove that Sargon isn't in the monsterverse. Please don't change the text of the article until you've come to a conclusion on the talk page. If you reach an impasse let me know and we can go from there. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:31, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Lindenhs Well I certainly applaud your networking skills for connecting with Mr. Keyes. But a text chat is what we call original research, which is generally disallowed. The issue is it has no publisher, so a reader can't easily verify if its true for themselves. But the Newsweek article at [1] does mention Sargon. Now, there might be a nuance here that I'm missing, perhaps there's a reason why its included in the Newsweek article that could be clarified in our article? CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 23:37, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Did you just say
edityou hope arbcom can lay out private parts a little more completely at some point? 😂 Levivich (talk) 00:34, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Levivich Oh dear me, unfortunate choice of wording there. One usually has to take ArbCom to dinner first :P CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 00:39, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Which is very expensive because there's like a dozen of them. That reminds me of a joke: Five Wikipedia arbitrators go out to dinner. The server asks, "What are you having?" The first arb says they'll wait to order until they hear what everyone else is ordering. The second arb says they'll wait to order to give time for the kitchen staff to make recommendations. The third arb says they're leaning towards the chicken, but they want to hear what the chicken has to say first. The fourth arb suggests skipping the orders and just paying the bill. The fifth arb says they're not available for dinner tonight, stands up and leaves the table, but then comes back later for dessert. Levivich (talk) 05:45, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- "They want to hear what the chicken has to say first" 🤣 Having had dinner with quite a number of arbs, I'd say they actually tend to make pretty good dinner guests! Though I doubt that dinner based arbitration will soon overtake our regular modes of arbitration :P CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 05:51, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- It could work: parties might agree to pay for dinner based arbitration--better than arbs deciding remedies on an empty stomach! Levivich (talk) 06:08, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Would the parties receive their just desserts? Newyorkbrad (talk) 14:04, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- LOL! I am stealing that for the next draft of the arbcom dinner joke. Levivich (talk) 15:43, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Would the parties receive their just desserts? Newyorkbrad (talk) 14:04, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- It could work: parties might agree to pay for dinner based arbitration--better than arbs deciding remedies on an empty stomach! Levivich (talk) 06:08, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- "They want to hear what the chicken has to say first" 🤣 Having had dinner with quite a number of arbs, I'd say they actually tend to make pretty good dinner guests! Though I doubt that dinner based arbitration will soon overtake our regular modes of arbitration :P CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 05:51, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Which is very expensive because there's like a dozen of them. That reminds me of a joke: Five Wikipedia arbitrators go out to dinner. The server asks, "What are you having?" The first arb says they'll wait to order until they hear what everyone else is ordering. The second arb says they'll wait to order to give time for the kitchen staff to make recommendations. The third arb says they're leaning towards the chicken, but they want to hear what the chicken has to say first. The fourth arb suggests skipping the orders and just paying the bill. The fifth arb says they're not available for dinner tonight, stands up and leaves the table, but then comes back later for dessert. Levivich (talk) 05:45, 20 July 2024 (UTC)