Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

User talk:ClockworkSoul/Archive7

Latest comment: 19 years ago by Kim 金 in topic Brazillian Wandering Spider

This is an archive page. If you wish to leave me message, please visit my talk page.

Wikipedia:Template standardisation

edit

Congratulations on your victory at Wikipedia:Template standardisation! Your submission was universally well received and easily won with 42 votes (second place, "Tick ToC", had 17). A great design, I have opened the floor for any final comments before it is implemented in a few days. Hopefully you will be able to take a look at the WP:TS page for a couple of days to see if there are any suggestions you think might be positive changes/additions – I can't think of any and you have the biggest say in what happens. violet/riga (t) 22:53, 1 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

  • Thanks, Violet! I spent many hours painstakingly going over every possible shade and wording, so I'm very pleased that my work was well received. Imagine how distraught I would have been had Tick Toc won! Over the next few days I will closely monitor the template standardisation page, but I'm fairly sure that most issues have probably already been settled in the run up to this event. – ClockworkSoul 23:00, 1 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Jimbo's Page

edit

Hi ClockworkSoul. I supported the conversion of Jimbo's page on the WP:TS page, and I support it here. I say go ahead and convert it. It looks nice and clean, and I think he'll be happy with it. If not, he can always revert it. --Zeerus (ETCWFD) 16:47, May 2, 2005 (UTC)

New award

edit

Hi ClockworkSoul, I've awarded you something. Check your Barnstarium for it. 8) Talrias (t | e | c) 18:34, 2 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Reply

edit

I've thought about it. I've been making stuff for a while now (I made the IUP stub, and maybe a few others). I'll go ahead and register. 67.103.122.2 aka DoomBringer 03:32, 3 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Vote on WP:TS

edit

Seeing as there seems to be some contention about it, I've gone through and tallied all the votes properly (using the correct method of calculating approval voting). It's at Wikipedia talk:Template_standardisation#Results. Talrias (t | e | c) 14:11, 3 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Good work!

edit

Hi - nothing specific, but you do good work in general, so I wanted to thank you for it. -- BD2412 thimk 22:27, 2005 May 3 (UTC)

Problem

edit

Hey. I notice this posting: User_talk:Phil_Boswell#Mirror_Image. Can the user who posted that can be blocked for it, and if so, please do. This posting was uncalled for and the poster, User:Spastika, has been warned about his username and his major POV pushing. Thanks. Zscout370 (talk) 22:51, 4 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Hey. Can the user who posted the above message and his mentor User:Jayjg be blocked for tag team POV pushing, and if so, please do. This editor is a POV pusher and the editor, User:ZScout370, has been warned about his major POV pushing and attitude problems. Thanks. --Tagteam213 22:54, 4 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Imposter

edit

It has been brought to my attention that there is a person who is impersonating you: User:ClockworkSouI. This user has not been blocked, yet. Zscout370 (talk) 15:09, 6 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

I have blocked ClockworkSoui indefinitely. – Quadell (talk) (sleuth) 15:28, May 6, 2005 (UTC)
I just noticed on RC another user: User:CIockworkSouI. This time, the "I" is on the second and last letters. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 16:44, 6 May 2005 (UTC)Reply
How long before we get Cl0ckw0rkS0ul and C10ckw0rkS0u1? -- WCFrancis 17:25, 6 May 2005 (UTC)Reply
No idea, but we need to watch out for the various variations. Zscout370 (talk) 17:50, 6 May 2005 (UTC)Reply
Can't be too long. I seem to be oddly popular recently for some reason. – ClockworkSoul 18:18, 6 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Our imposter is back. He created another impersonation of JMBell. --Chanting Fox 21:32, 6 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Well, well, that's not very nice. At least I know how to get up when I fall down. And that wsa a pretty good lookout, dont' you think? Very fast relay. JMBell° 21:34, 6 May 2005 (UTC)Reply
The above note was writen by User:JMBelI, the new imposter of JMBell.

Thank You!

edit

Hello ClockworkSoul! Thank you for welcoming me! It seems that I'm a new user, but this is not the case, because I'm editing in the German wikipedia since about a year. Now I'm trying to connect some articles with the "interwiki"-link. It's a nice thing recognicing that all over the world there are working a lot of people together on the same idea! Greetings from Germany, --Mounir 21:13, 6 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, but it appears that Vandalfox's name is accurate...

edit

Just checked one of the images he just uploaded. It's a picture of the male genitals. I don't even want look at the others. --Chanting Fox 21:20, 6 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

I think you can place the images for speedy deletion, and man, I hope all of this mess ends quickly and painlessly. Zscout370 (talk) 21:36, 6 May 2005 (UTC)Reply
I deleted them 15 minutes ago, entirely withour prejudice. – ClockworkSoul 21:38, 6 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Impersonation

edit

You seem to be blocking a lot of impersonators lately. Any tips on tracking them down? Mgm|(talk) 22:00, May 6, 2005 (UTC)

About your star pictures

edit

Hi, I'm an active user on the Spanish Wikipedia wondering if the star images (Image:Cscr-candidate.png, Image:Cscr-featured.png, and such) are free for use on the other Wikipedias. We're currently organizing our feautured articles and having templates similar to the ones on this wiki would be great. You can answer me either here or here.--Fito 01:46, May 7, 2005 (UTC)

Fito, they can be used on other Wikipedias. Clockwork, I can upload this image to the Wikimedia Commons for you. Zscout370 (talk) 01:48, 7 May 2005 (UTC)Reply
Fito: absolutely, you can take all of them you like. The original, unmodified versions are Image:Featured article star.png, Image:Featured article candidate .png, Image:Star piece.png, and Image:Former featured article candidate.png, if you want them. Zscout, if you wanted to upload them, that would be great. – ClockworkSoul 01:55, 7 May 2005 (UTC)Reply
Clockwork, the files have been uploaded to the Commons under the same LGPL license. I also think the original, unmodified, stars can also be uploaded. If we can create standard templates in all Wiki's, that will also be a good idea. Zscout370 (talk) 01:59, 7 May 2005 (UTC)Reply
Thanks alot. I'm going to propose the template standarisation over there too.--Fito 02:07, May 7, 2005 (UTC)
I am sure you can probably present the templates that we use here, and if that works, I hope the other Wiki's follow suit. Plus, Fito, if you need anything from here and use it on Spanish Wikipedia, just let me, Clockwork or others know. Zscout370 (talk) 02:09, 7 May 2005 (UTC)Reply
I would be very honored if you did decide to use the recently created templated standardization scheme. As Zscout370 said, if there anything we can do to help, please do not hesitate to ask. – ClockworkSoul 02:18, 7 May 2005 (UTC)Reply
K, thank you guys.--Fito 02:25, May 7, 2005 (UTC)

Robo_Donut artical

edit

It has come to my attention that someone has created me a wikipedia page. He is not me, but an individual who happens to be very bored at a LAN party. I am sorry that he has wasted your time and created a completely useless topic on this great site.

Template:Mountain

edit

Hi. This template is a part of WikiProject Mountains. While there may be a new process for standardizing templates, I think projects should be given a chance to voice their opinions on a change to one of their templates before it's changed unilaterally by someone not actively involved in the project. RedWolf 08:00, May 7, 2005 (UTC)

Another imposter!

edit

I just saw another imposter on RC: User:JmoIiver. The "I" is on the fourth letter. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 16:11, 7 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

  • Got him. Thanks. – ClockworkSoul 16:14, 7 May 2005 (UTC)Reply
    • You are welcome. Yesterday, I changed my skin to display everything in Verdana. Not only it is more comfortable for me to read personally, it is easier to spot I's. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 16:17, 7 May 2005 (UTC)Reply
      • Your block template isn't very smart. You should leave the redirect in there like what Quadell did. Really stupid, I must say. Requesting block and acct. deletion. Also, you're not as smart as you think. I've got three impersonations stashed away there and you even failed to see them. See you aound. TempoAcct. 16:27, 7 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Barnstars

edit

We need to start clearing off some of the proposials we have. We have so much that needs voted on, and the voting to end. I can see if the other guys want to help vote on a few things. Zscout370 (talk) 17:19, 7 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

We seem to have collided in updating DYK. You didn't even see my inuse notice. I'm not using the Railway article because it's much more stubby than the others. Hope you don't mind. Mgm|(talk) 19:13, May 7, 2005 (UTC)

  • I've put up protection notices. If you can inform people of the update, please do so. I'm planning on some other edits. Mgm|(talk) 19:18, May 7, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks

edit

Is that so? Thanks for the welcome and the tip. Jim BeIl 19:40, 7 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

User:Jim BeIl

edit

Hi. I don't know whether you know of User:JMBell, but this user seems to be a pretty clear impersonation or similar. Added to that, his user name is JIM BEIL, with an I (i), which is a trait of an impersonation vandal I blocked last night. Just so you know, cheers, Smoddy (Rabbit and pork) 19:48, 7 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Nice one! Jim Bell 20:35, 7 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Whoa, clock boy, calm down there, mate. Jim Bell 20:35, 7 May 2005 (UTC)Reply
I'm not gonna stop till I say stop, you got that? I'm not sayin stop! Jim Bell 20:37, 7 May 2005 (UTC)Reply
Block block block. Jim Bell 20:38, 7 May 2005 (UTC)Reply
Really these blocks get me goat Jim Bell 20:38, 7 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Template:Impostor

edit

This template is really useful (congratulations on the design, btw), but I have one concern. Does impersonation really get someone banned? I thought it got them blocked... Could you verify this for me? I know its semantics, but it is important in this case. Smoddy (Rabbit and pork) 20:41, 7 May 2005 (UTC) (edit conflict count: 4)Reply

Protection

edit

I've removed the protection from your talk page, as other users do want to contact you, as I've heard from IRC, and it's not good form to stop others from contacting you. You also didn't provide reason why you protected both your talk and user pages. Dysprosia 07:27, 8 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

User:SPUl

edit

Thanks for going about the impostor blocking. However, User:SPUl was not an impostor; I created it as a preemptive measure, and there's no reason to block it (not like it would be useful as a sockpuppet, being meant to be confused with me). --SPUI (talk) 07:28, 8 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, not a problem. --SPUI (talk) 19:41, 8 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

AMA

edit

Hi. I recently added myself to the AMA list and, as I am happy to be actively involved at the moment, wondered if I should add myself to the list on Wikipedia:AMA_Advocates_accepting_inquiries (or whether some other process had to take place before I went on that list). Also, I left a note on Adam756's talk page but it looks like he is not currently contributing. Do you know if the AMA is still active and if Adam756 is still active as the coordinator? Cheers. TigerShark 15:01, 8 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

RfC Trey Stone

edit

Hello, according to a message you left on his talk page, you blocked user Trey Stone for 24 hours on March 19 for "user page vandalism, making personal attacks, and violating the three revert rule". I have just opened an RfC on him Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Trey Stone and it would be most helpful if you could add information about those problems to that page; I couldn't find an entry for the block on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR. If you'd care to add anything else to that RfC it would be most helpful. Thanks, -- Viajero 12:50, 9 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your help. Naturally I have my doubts about the effectiveness of the RfC process, but I suppose we have to work the mechanisms that we have to resolve disputes. All the best, -- Viajero 19:40, 10 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Thanks :-) I think it will be in 2-3 weeks in France Anthere

Impostor hunting

edit

Thanks! That Cstar isn't me. --CSTAR 03:21, 11 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! How do you find them, if they haven't made any edits? Jayjg (talk) 05:10, 11 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

I would appreciate that, if you don't mind. You've definitely aroused my curiosity. Jayjg (talk) 05:26, 11 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

That actually is me. Since my IRC nick has no space, I set User:DanteAlighieri (no space) as a redirect to my actual name (with space). Thanks for the heads-up though! --Dante Alighieri | Talk 06:43, May 11, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip off. Deb 11:54, 11 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Never mind. I know how you find me, anyway. You troll RC and then zap all suspicious new user pages, dontcha? And then you find other variations and block them. I know how you do this stuff so you don't have to hide it from me. PIek 12:00, 11 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! All of those accounts you pointed out are ones I created some time age to prevent them from being taken by trolls, vandals, or impostors. -- Seth Ilys 12:05, 11 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Another thanks, and mine too were created by me to avoid someone else getting hold of them first. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 17:30, 11 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Deleted talk page

edit

Somebody with username User:Plek just erased my my talk page replacing its contents with an impostor banner.--CSTAR 13:05, 11 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

As far as I could tell, the URL of the phony User:Plek and real one were identical. Am I mistaken? If this is so, it's a real security bug.--CSTAR 13:52, 11 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Re: Imposter Hunting

edit

Thank you for your message. After I was impersonated on another wikipedia site I went to all of the others and created my username there as a redirect to this one. The one you have located was a deliberate ploy of mine to take the username and keep it as a dummy, before anyone else tried to.

-- Francs2000 | Talk [[]] 00:20, 12 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Accusation of vandalizing

edit

Hello, ClockworkSoul. At last I know an administrator. First, I want to say that SqueakBox is vandalizing my talk page. He includes a dialogue that has nothing to do with me and text that belongs to the talk page of a former nick of mine I use no more because I discover too late that the name did not comply with the Wikipedia rules. I have reported it. I hope you will be a fair behavior and you will not make distinctions.

Besides, I am not vandalizing anybody. The user SqueakBox in his user page includes a badge saying that he has gone beyond the call of duty and I do not know what things more. He is a very difficult user who has had a lot of problems with many users because he makes kind of erratic edits. Simply take a look at his talk page. For example a user complain for the following: "Any reason to keep editing my Fidel Castro remarks? You a Castro accolyte? Tell me how Forbes saying he has 500 million dollars is not factual information worthy of being on the guy's bio?"

I do not like him including anything that looks like official when as far as I know he has never made any useful contribution. He only wants to project an image of being a "Wiki hero" to humilliate those who are attacked and insulted by him. I believe that is not the Wikipedia way.

He also has the photograph of a cat and he uses offensive language to refer to him. I am unable to tolarate that attitute towards animals.

Besides, SqueakBox has made something I consider pure vandalism. He went to the article José Luis Rodriguez Zapatero. It was very long, so a month ago it was broken into several parts. He went to the extended articles, Zapatero's years as an opposition leader, Zapatero and the Local and Regional Elections of 2003, Zapatero and the 2004 General Election, Zapatero's domestic policy and Zapatero's foreign policy and substituted its text by a REDIRECT statement to the main article José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero to hamper its recovery and has removed from the it the links to them to avoid honest users accessing them.

Besides, he has a very unpleasent apporach towards me. For example, he says that the article "I made" of José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero is very bad, that I have no idea of what an Encyclopedia has to be and a lot of other things. If you go to the article you will find it was edited by a lot of people and I do not understand why it is my article and not that of other person.

Thank you for your attention. Zapatancas 09:16, 12 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Did you know?

edit

Userpage

edit

I hope you don't mind but I stole the code for the layout of your user page - it's quite clever and neat. I was just wondering if you're ok with it, then could you tell me how to space the columns out better? Thanks. ♪ Craigy ♫ 06:39, May 13, 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Vandalism_in_progress

edit

Can you come here and not only see if you can solve the situation but also to see if I am doing anything illegal here. I was listed as a vandal for reasons that to me, are probably out of spite or disagreement. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 00:13, 14 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Barnstars

edit

You seemed to have issued a number of Barnstars, so maybe you can answer me this: I want to award Bishonen a Barnstar for his article on European toilet paper holders, but I'm not sure if he qualifies because it is apart of his user page. The article was featured (for a very short period of time) on the main page this past April 1st, and really is of feature quality. Anyway, does he qualify for a Barnstar? *Kat* 05:41, May 14, 2005 (UTC)

  • Though I am not Clockwork, Bishonen can qualify for a Barnstar. If he worked very hard to get the article created, and also got it on the front page for a short time, a normal Barnstar will do. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 03:59, 15 May 2005 (UTC)Reply
  • Sorry for the delay in my response. Zscout370 is absolutely right. Barnstars are not a strict or formal thing, they can be given out whenever you see something that deserves recognition. I remember that article: it was our April Fool's article this year. I recommend the Oddball Barnstar, but it's totally up to you. :) – ClockworkSoul 06:12, 15 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Zscout and Clockworksoul! And I agree with Clockworksoul, the Oddball Barnstar is in order here.*Kat* 07:24, May 15, 2005 (UTC)

Thank you very much, *Kat*. ETPH lives in my userspace, but it has a number of faithful and "dedicated, not to say demented" (as User:Filiocht has put it) contributors, so I've inserted the, uh ... how shall I put this ... very lovely star on the ETPH talk page. If time should ever hang heavy on your hands, please come and contribute to the article! I'm a she, btw. --Bishonen | talk 22:29, 15 May 2005 (UTC)Reply
Hmmm... I wonder how I ended up here? Maybe the Oddball barnstar works some kind of magic, it wouldn't surprise me. I'll just have another go at placing this on *Kat*'s page.--Bishonen | talk 22:34, 15 May 2005 (UTC)Reply
OK, now it's already here... I'm frightened.--Bishonen | talk 22:41, 15 May 2005 (UTC)Reply
I think a template was added to my page by accident by ClockworkSoul. It looks it has been removed. But, well, I will see if odd things are happening, I can talk to Clockwork. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 03:02, 16 May 2005 (UTC)Reply
Not by accident: the template page allows us to maintain one conversation on multiple pages. The only drawback is that you don't get the cool organge bar. – ClockworkSoul 03:30, 16 May 2005 (UTC)Reply
I like it, but do you realize that all this is showing up on my talkpage too? Not that I mind, but some people might. *Kat* 20:51, May 16, 2005 (UTC)
Oh, I see how this works (sort of). Where did you get this template? *Kat* 20:53, May 16, 2005 (UTC)
It's easy to make one: I just made a page in my user directory (User talk:ClockworkSoul/20050515-01), and just dropped the page name onto the talk pag ein template-curlies: {{User talk:ClockworkSoul/20050515-01}}. – ClockworkSoul 20:53, 17 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Brazillian Wandering Spider

edit

Hi,

I see that you negotiated with the owner of the copyrighted Brazillian Wandering Spider image for permission to put in in the English Wikipedia. Would you mind trying to get the same permission for the Wikipedia Commons so that I could use the image in the Chinese language version without lots of work-arounds? Thanks. 金 (Kim) 08:19, 14 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your quick reply. Actually, there are two or more different ways of giving permission on the Commons. Part of the reason is that European restrictions may be more strict. I think you could probably find some way of letting people use his picture for non-commercial and/or educational purposes only. If you have a feeling for what he wants to protect himself from you might have a look at the Commons upload area where they give links to the various kinds of permissions templates and see whether there appears to be anything there that might fit his needs. 金 (Kim) 07:17, 16 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

A suitable copyright tag that the photographer might use may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ That license, among other, is found about half way down at the following URL http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_tags 金 (Kim) 21:41, 17 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Mediation

edit

Hiya.... I see you are still on the list of "request to be mediator". That is long enough and time to really do it :-)

Here is the deal : Aesthetic Realism. We had a formal request for help on the board list... it seems a good nest for a mediator. Would you jump in it ? (please, say yes)

Cheers.

Anthere 08:47, 14 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

FAC

edit

Hey, I was wondering what should I do on this. I am trying to get an article to become Featured, called Hero_of_Belarus. The Hero of Belarus is a title that is awarded by the Republic of Belarus to those who perform great deeds in the name of the State. It is the Belarussian version of the Hero of the Soviet Union. After I am done with the article, I want to invite people to come in, comment on it, and then put it up on WP:FAC. I was wondering if you can help. Regards, Zscout370 (Sound Off) 04:02, 15 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Cascading coffee roll

edit

There's been some talk about rolling the standard template design into the local Mediawiki stylesheets. One issue that came up is to what extent the CSS implementation of your design conforms to your intentions. The discussion is taking place on Wikipedia talk:Template standardisation#move the standard to CSS. Cheers, --MarkSweep 09:57, 15 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

My sig

edit

Thank you for your kind remark! astiquetalk 03:53, 16 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Please help mediate the Aesthetic Realism dispute

edit

Not sure why my post here yesterday didn't show up, perhaps I forgot to hit Save Page after Preview. In any event, Yes, for the love of god please help us mediate the Aesthetic realism dispute!

Aesthetic realism is a philosophy encompassing art, psychology, and personal therapy. I don't dispute the philosophy itself, but I contend that the group that promotes its study (the Aesthetic Realism Foundation) operates as a cult. I was born into the group, as was my mother, since her parents were involved. I had a "lesson" with the founder/leader Eli Siegel at the advanced age of two.

My concern about the article is that the AR people censor any criticism from the article or otherwise whitewash it. My first contribution to the article was adding a single sentence, something like "Some complain that the group that promotes its study operates as a cult." The AR people removed that sentence. I added it back, they removed it, etc.

Eventually other Wikipedians decried the bias in the article, so the AR people finally allowed the link to stand, but they kept excising other points that appeared in the article. I added a note that Eli Siegel killed himself, they removed it, I added it back, they removed it, etc. They also filled the article with cheerleading so it read more like an advertisement than an encyclopaedic entry.

As I write this I feel the article is actually in pretty good shape. I do have a few specific objections, but the article is still much, much better than it used to be. I have no problem with the AR people telling their side of the story but I feel that criticism should be fairly represented.

What I'd like to get out of mediation, besides some kind of agreement about the article content, is some kind of negotiated truce that neither side will edit the article any further except pursuant to some other condition, such as the edits first being floated on the Talk page, receiving support from established Wikipedians (e.g., ten articles edited prior to August 2004), and such Wikipedians making the changes themselves, not me or the AR people. I'm flexible on the details of course, I just don't want your effort to be wasted with brand-new edit wars starting right after we reach a hard-won agreement.

Thank you very much for your help, Michaelbluejay 05:46, 16 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Can I get a newcomer barnstar?

edit

I've been a fervent contributor to wikipedia also have my signature on other forums with wikipedia and love wiki. just check out some of my original contributions. one has already been featured in the "india portal" Wikipedia:Wikiportal/India titled "Biryani" under "Cuisine" which was a painstaking original contribution. I've added many other such titles and there has been a gap in contribution due to personal reasons, else I think I deserve the newcomer award. Heh, maybe i'm just boasting myself and i don't have a sense of humility, but hey what the i'm giving it a shot. maybe i'll get some medal.

btw, i'm also currently undertaking a project to tabulate and add photos to all the boxers. please check out boxers like Jack Johnson and Sugar Ray Leonard to see what i'm talking about. i hope someone also can help with this. i hope if u r not the person who awards the barnstars please tell me to whom i should approach to get one.

thanks. a very eager eyed wikipedian. Idleguy 12:19, May 16, 2005 (UTC)


MY TALK PAGE


Please, add new entries to the bottom and don't forget to sign your name by typing four tildes: ~~~~.

Please, no spam.
Archive1 Archive2 Archive3 Archive4 Archive5 Archive6