| This is Denaar's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
If you would like to discuss an edit I make, please do so on the talk page of that article. Wikipedia is a collaborative place, it's ok to disagree on article direction! The talk pages are there to help generate consensus about the article. If you bring article discussion here, I'll move it to the talk page of that article and respond there. Denaar (talk) 05:26, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
- Greetings!
- Just now created this account for the purpose on messaging- someone, anyone, who has participated articles concerning Chlorine Dioxide. A family member has introduced my family to it and i, as well as many people i know, have been sporadically taking it orally (of course not pure, diluted with water) to supposedly help cure a variety of ailments for a longer period of time. And i am really puzzled. One side, backed by virtually all of the existing medial and medical institutions, claims that its poison and dangerous, the other one (of which i only really know about because of my family member) says that it only releases oxygen into your blood and can indeed be used to hypercharge your immune system, thereby managing to cure lots of things. You definitely seem to be part of the first group and seem to have knowledge on it- on what do you base your opinion? I would really like to know.. we have not seen any negative side effects that could have come from that, out health has not really deceased. I don‘t know if it helped, i think such self-analysis is very very hard to do objectively- but those claims seem to be wrong. What do you think? Is this explainable with your perception/knowledge of how this all works? And like said, where do you get that from, what do you base it on?
- I would be very grateful for an answer.
- Seb Sebdepp (talk) 07:45, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- P.S., if you want we may communicate directly per Email or Discord, just send me yours. My DC is ‚.trihawk‘. Sebdepp (talk) 07:48, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Important alert
editThis appears to be an obsolete AC/DS notice from the pre-CTopics era.
|
|---|
 This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place |
- Denaar, This appears to me to be an obsolete notice that no longer represents the current guidance of the Arbitration Committee on this topic. I believe that this notice was placed in good faith, and an admin might interpret it as a good-enough proxy for the correct one, so it's probably wise to read the current advice about contentious topics in general, and more particularly the one about India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. (Non-administrator comment) Mathglot (talk) 03:51, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- The article I was working on wasn't tagged - and I didn't realize it was a minefield at the time! I appreciate the correct link. Denaar (talk) 03:55, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
GAG
editI think you make a lot of improvements that I do agree with, and I don't mean to come off as stonewalling or confrontational. I appreciate your conviction and resolve to adhere to 5p, I just don't see the way this topic is being treated as changing the lens through which policy is viewed. It seems like STATUS QUO to me. DN (talk) 08:34, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- I appreciate your willingness to collaborate and not take things personally. I think that "far-right" is hyperbole being used to create a reaction, designed to sound impartial without actually being impartial. But after clicking on the link and reading the lead on the article for far-right... I mean, wow, that's an extreme word.
- Another one I'm stuck on is this article for Andreas Kalcker. I am not saying the criticism isn't fair, but I don't think the way this article stands is compliant with Wikipedia standards, but I'm not sure what to do with it. I don't think he's notable, but I think there really IS a story in "The use of MMS in Argentina during Covid" that has resulted in several deaths, and a whole bunch of people involved, a lot of information in those sources not in the article because none of it applies to him - but it's quite the story. I'm still trying to figure out how to approach it fairly. Denaar (talk) 20:43, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Contentious topics
|
|---|
Introduction to contentious topicsedit You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project. Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
|
Copying or moving content within Wikipedia requires attribution
edit
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 1997 Constitution of Fiji into Constitution of Fiji. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:29, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
edit
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)