Dofftoubab
Welcome!
edit
|
Hi Dofftoubab! Welcome to the Alabama WikiProject! Please jump right in! If you have any questions, post a note on the project talk page or ask someone on the member list. |
Shibboleths
editI notice that you have contributed to List of shibboleths; i have made a [suggestion] on the talk page that you might be interested in commenting on. If that article no longer holds your interest, i apologise for intruding, and return you to previously scheduled programming. Cheers, LindsayHi 08:40, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
edit
Message added 20:06, 6 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Capitalization within headers
editHey, unless something is a proper name please don't capitalize anything other than the first word in a Wikipedia header. For instance, instead of adding ==Notable Natives==, you should add ==Notable natives==. Also, its usually a good idea to check under any "See also" headers or elsewhere in the main article to see if a subpage may already contain the information, such as in the Demopolis, Alabama article, where the notable natives are all listed at List of people from Demopolis, Alabama. This is often (but not always) the case with larger cities. If you have any questions, just ask me on my talk page. Thanks for your help. Altairisfar (talk) 05:13, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the tips! The capitalization has just been a habit from proofreading too many papers, but I'll make sure to do it correctly from now on. Thanks for fixing the Demopolis stuff too. Sorry about that.
- No problem, too many "rules" around here for anyone to learn them all at once. I'll see what I can do to fix the Valhermoso Springs coordinates. Altairisfar (talk) 14:38, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Categories
editThanks for the contributions. However, when somebody is already categorised in a people-from-city category, you don't need to add a people-by-county category, as the by-city category is included in the by-county category already. 
- The Bushranger One ping only 05:22, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Ok. Thanks for the tips!Dofftoubab (talk) 14:04, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Boykin
editI didn't see the Gee's Bend part of the article. I scanned the page for Boykin. Sorry about that! Magnolia677 (talk) 17:15, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
It's all good! Thanks!Dofftoubab (talk) 17:18, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Ways to improve Bluffton, Alabama
editHi, I'm Teblick. Dofftoubab, thanks for creating Bluffton, Alabama!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This article needs more references. You have cited the source of the infobox's content, but what is the source of the material about John Levi Sheppard?
Can you expand the article? Here are a few questions that you might consider:
- What is Bluffton's population? Has it increased or decreased markedly over the years?
- What is the main economic factor -- farming? industry? something else? (I found a reference to Bluffton Iron Mines at http://books.google.com/books?id=qHwhAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA237&dq=%22Bluffton+Alabama%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=lIjJU_HgBsWtyAT264CoDQ&ved=0CC4Q6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=%22Bluffton%20Alabama%22&f=false. Are they still active?
- What are highlights of Bluffton's social and religious activities? (Apparently Mt. Signal Masonic Lodge was founded there, but moved. See http://books.google.com/books?id=iV4iAAAAMAAJ&pg=RA3-PA133&dq=%22Bluffton+Alabama%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=lIjJU_HgBsWtyAT264CoDQ&ved=0CDMQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=%22Bluffton%20Alabama%22&f=false.)
- What media does Bluffton have in its history? I found mention of a Bluffton News at http://books.google.com/books?id=UsQUAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA536&dq=%22Bluffton+Alabama%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=lIjJU_HgBsWtyAT264CoDQ&ved=0CFwQ6AEwCw#v=onepage&q=%22Bluffton%20Alabama%22&f=false.
- Was Bluffton once a tourist site? A "20 pages, illustrated" pamphlet about it is mentioned in an 1891 newspaper article at http://books.google.com/books?id=BuIhAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA750&dq=%22Bluffton+Alabama%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=lIjJU_HgBsWtyAT264CoDQ&ved=0CGcQ6AEwDQ#v=onepage&q=%22Bluffton%20Alabama%22&f=false.
I think that more research would help you develop a much more interesting article.
I am also curious about one other thing. Your article identifies Bluffton as unincorporated, but I see from the Acts of the General Assembly of the State of Alabama that an election for incorporation was to be held in January 1866. Did that vote fail to pass, or did something else happen to make the community unincorporated? See http://books.google.com/books?id=OZM3AAAAIAAJ&pg=PA154&dq=Bluffton+Alabama&hl=en&sa=X&ei=ToXJU8LqNJW0yAThzoCgBQ&ved=0CE4Q6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=Bluffton%20Alabama&f=false
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Eddie Blick (talk) 20:45, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Albert A. Murphree
editHey. I just saw your birthplace edit to the Murphree article. Can you explain? It's one of my watch-listed articles, and I try to make sure no one is inserting goofy stuff. Thanks. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 01:56, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
- No problem. Chepultepec is the former name of the town of Allgood, Alabama. It was called Chepultepec when Albert Murphree was born there, but it's now known as Allgood. Dofftoubab (talk) 02:01, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
- Excellent, good to know. When I wrote most of the article four or five years ago, I had a hell of time finding any references to Chepultepec, Alabama; as I recall, it was pretty close to a literal cross-roads consisting of handful of buildings. I guess the hometown enthusiasm for the Mexican-American War eventually died out, eh? Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 02:42, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah, Alabama is full of random place names. Not to give a history lesson, but the town was renamed after a lime manufacturer believed he wasn't getting repeat customers because clients couldn't spell the town's name. Dofftoubab (talk) 03:10, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah, buddy! It's all good!. LOL Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 03:24, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Bay Minette, Alabama and others
editHey friend, no offence, but when I see a notable person added to a list, with the edit summary "added entry based on personal page", I know it's probably wrong...and it was. When you do this, you pass sloppy editing from one article to another. When you make an edit, please check your own sources. Thanks for your understanding. Magnolia677 (talk) 04:27, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- And I'm not sure why you added Regina Benjamin to the Fairhope, Alabama article. If you read WP:USCITIES it states that notable people lists should contain "any famous or notable individuals that were born, or lived for a significant amount of time, in the city". All I was able to find what that she attended high school in Fairhope. You did check your sources before adding this, right? Magnolia677 (talk) 04:41, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- No problem. Sorry about that. I should have been looking at the sources in addition to the personal pages. For Regina Benjamin, I found articles calling her a native. [1]. And how long should a person live in a city to be a significant amount of time? I know someone could live in a place for a very short time to be a graduate from a school, so I was just wondering what you thought about that. Thanks for correcting my mistakes. I'll be more careful.Dofftoubab (talk) 04:49, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- And Milt Stock. No evidence he did anything but die in Fairhope. If you look at Google maps there's a cancer center and a regional hospital there. Please take care to check that what you add to Wikipedia is correct. This is the cornerstone of Wikipedia. I know it takes more time and effort, but cleanup takes longer. Thanks again for your understanding. Magnolia677 (talk) 05:00, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- Will do. Thanks for fixing that. I'll definitely look into notable people before I add them again. Thanks!Dofftoubab (talk) 05:06, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- And Milt Stock. No evidence he did anything but die in Fairhope. If you look at Google maps there's a cancer center and a regional hospital there. Please take care to check that what you add to Wikipedia is correct. This is the cornerstone of Wikipedia. I know it takes more time and effort, but cleanup takes longer. Thanks again for your understanding. Magnolia677 (talk) 05:00, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- No problem. Sorry about that. I should have been looking at the sources in addition to the personal pages. For Regina Benjamin, I found articles calling her a native. [1]. And how long should a person live in a city to be a significant amount of time? I know someone could live in a place for a very short time to be a graduate from a school, so I was just wondering what you thought about that. Thanks for correcting my mistakes. I'll be more careful.Dofftoubab (talk) 04:49, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Learn more about page curation.
Dofftoubab:
I'm sending this to you in part because you work on the Alabama wiki (I'm an Alabama native who grew up in Birmingham). You're also the first editor of the William A. Lundy entry I found who had a talk page.
I saw you've made a minor edit (and can't be blamed for the overall piece) in the William A. Lundy piece, i.e. the guy who claimed to be one of the oldest Confederate veterans.
Lundy (whose family used Lunday until he changed it in response to the teacher)
There are glaring problems on the page without considering the that Lundy was a complete fraud.
The intro says that he "served with 4th Alabama Infantry from 1864-1865" The first paragraph of the Biography says he enlisted in "Company D (Brown's), 4th Alabama Cavalry Regiment (Home Guard) at Elba. Big difference between the two.
The 4th infantry served from the outset in Northern Virginia and was eventually combined with other regiments to form the Alabama Brigade. It fought at the battles from First Manassas through Appomattox. The home guard cavalry didn't. It's unlikely that any recruiting for that unit in Elba, but i don't know or care. It was his claim. There was no hard evidence or other substantiation. He wasn't "allegedly born" at Troy, that's what he claimed. Along with the rest of it. Given his overall problem with credibility "He is said to have enlisted" is weak anonymous attribution. There are NO crediblle sources for anything he claimed.
I do think it's possible he was born in Troy, his parents were married in Pike County -- except as I'll note elsewhere, the existence of that marriage as it was recorded, is proof positive just in itself that William A. Lundy is a liar. Why? Because if you look at the dates, they're real enough. By the time I saw that, I had researched Census and other records from 1840 through 1950. Their marriage records page notes both the wedding and a very specific addendum regarding a $200 penal bond which they were required to execute as a condition of their marriage.
It is a unique bit of marriage law in Alabama that applies ONLY to weddings between the minors who are either 16 or 17. William's father was 17 years old in 1855 and the bride was 26. If you know that the mother was older and born first, there's only one conclusion. He was actually born in 1859.
The family don't want to hear their ancestor was a liar and a scoundrel.
FWIW, that page on Lundy, aside from being superficial, is contradicted by a much more authoritative page of last confederate survivors, claimed and frauds. Pleasant Cump of Alabama was the last authentic Confederal survivor. The other 12 after him were all frauds. I'll put up the details on my talk page jmc9595. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmc9595 (talk • contribs) 06:15, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
You stated "A post office under the name Capshaw was first opened in 1918.", based on the http://www.postalhistory.com/ website. While the information appears correct, this is very much not a reliable source. The USPS "Postmaster Finder" shows research on this particular PO as being incomplete. Looking at what historical references I quickly found (see http://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/002137107) the PO was originally listed in 1919 (which is consistent, but not the statement made). Presumably, more detailed information exists offline in the USPS archives and will be eventually available on Postmaster Finder. Please fix this (and any other places where you used that website as a source) to use better references...that particular one is rather poor, by the RS criteria. It appears to simply be an unreferenced (and unsourced) listing of information from some other source, with no attempt at being verifiable. The possibility of simple transcription errors from whatever reference was being used, and no apparent editorial oversight or fact checking, makes it a very poor source. While it does not seem to actually be 'wrong' here, it's not verifiable, and the author obviously has no 'personal' knowledge of the facts stated. Thanks.
(To be more explicit, something like "A post office under the name Capshaw was first listed by the USPS..." with reference to the 1918 and 1919 Guides would be better. The Guides are... not primary, but 'first person' (the USPS is a 'legal person') sources, and also factual information known to a corporate entity which would derive no benefit from lying about it...they can thus can be considered reliable for simple factual information. Using the postalhistory website as a source is poor 'academic practice'. It makes no attempt at being verifiable, and no claim to have any sort of editorial oversight. "Someone said so on the Internet" does not work as a source.)
Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
edit
|
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! |
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
editHello, Dofftoubab
Thank you for creating Rutthven, Alabama.
User:Sam-2727, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thank you for creating this redirect! In the future, I'd recommend using WP:ARCHER to categorize your redirects.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sam-2727}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
editHello, Dofftoubab
Thank you for creating Milstead, Alabama.
User:MrClog, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
"Auburn University maintains the E.V. Smith Research Center in Milstead." needs a source.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MrClog}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Ways to improve Tanner Williams, Alabama
editHello, Dofftoubab,
Thank you for creating Tanner Williams, Alabama.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Please try to expand the article
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Amkgp}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Hi, feel free to add your articles to this! † Encyclopædius 21:32, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 20
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of places in Alabama: A–C, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cloverdale, Alabama (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:27, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Mississippi
editYou may be interested in this source:[1][2]
References
- ^ Rowland, Dunbar (1907). Mississippi: Comprising Sketches of Counties, Towns, Events, Institutions, and Persons, Arranged in Cyclopedic Form. Vol. 1. Southern Historical Publishing Association. p. 40.
- ^ Rowland, Dunbar (1907). Mississippi: Comprising Sketches of Counties, Towns, Events, Institutions, and Persons, Arranged in Cyclopedic Form (PDF). Vol. 2. Southern Historical Publishing Association. p. 933.
Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:01, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for sending that! I've got a copy of "Place Names in Alabama" and saw there was a book called "Hometown Mississippi" that is in the same style for Mississippi, but couldn't find a physical copy for sale. This should come in handy. Quick question: was there a reason the page for Mahned, Mississippi was removed from the Perry County, Mississippi unincorporated community section, or was this just removed before I had made the page? I'm in the process of making a page for Wingate, Mississippi also. If it was just the fact that I hadn't made the pages yet, no worries. Thanks for your help! Dofftoubab (talk) 21:11, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
- I removed them as they were unsourced redlinks. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:46, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
- Your Mississippi edits are fabulous. I just noticed your edit to West Point, Mississippi and I think the article layout needs a cleanup. Mostly I just line up the sections using WP:USCITIES. User:Jacona edited right before you; an excellent editor to US town article and a good resource. Cheers! Magnolia677 (talk) 21:58, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for that Magnolia677! That means a lot coming from you, as I very much respect you as a Wikipedian. I've learned a lot from you and other users and still have a lot left to learn.Dofftoubab (talk) 02:26, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
- Your Mississippi edits are fabulous. I just noticed your edit to West Point, Mississippi and I think the article layout needs a cleanup. Mostly I just line up the sections using WP:USCITIES. User:Jacona edited right before you; an excellent editor to US town article and a good resource. Cheers! Magnolia677 (talk) 21:58, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- I removed them as they were unsourced redlinks. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:46, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Fort Strother
editWould this be helpful for working on the Fort Strother article? And if it's NRHP, the nomination form is probably lurking around on the internet somewhere, and those forms generally have some good detail, as well. Hog Farm Talk 04:57, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for sending me that! I've added some of the information from there to the Fort Strother article. I'd love to be able to go to the Public Library of Anniston-Calhoun County one day and see some of the information they have there on the fort. I'd looked for a NRHP .pdf when I first expanded the article, but was never able to find one. It looks like the Department of the Interior hasn't digitized the nomination papers or supporting papers according to their web site yet. Dofftoubab (talk) 22:29, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'm starting to think it hasn't been digitized, too. NRHP database page does not include a link to it, which pretty much makes it certain there's no available online copy. If that form ever gets digitized, that ought to help with the detail. I've written a handful of NRHP site GAs, and I've found that form to be useful in about all cases. Hog Farm Talk 22:36, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- They're good stuff. My favorite thing about them is that not only do they include information about the site/building's architecture and current condition, but they also go into the history of the structure/site and the surrounding area. The NRHP is one government program that I'm super proud of. Dofftoubab (talk) 15:28, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'm starting to think it hasn't been digitized, too. NRHP database page does not include a link to it, which pretty much makes it certain there's no available online copy. If that form ever gets digitized, that ought to help with the detail. I've written a handful of NRHP site GAs, and I've found that form to be useful in about all cases. Hog Farm Talk 22:36, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Canoe Fight (Creek War)
editHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Canoe Fight (Creek War) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomobe03 -- Tomobe03 (talk) 17:01, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Canoe Fight (Creek War)
editThe article Canoe Fight (Creek War) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Canoe Fight (Creek War) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomobe03 -- Tomobe03 (talk) 16:40, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Canoe Fight (Creek War)
editThe article Canoe Fight (Creek War) you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Canoe Fight (Creek War) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomobe03 -- Tomobe03 (talk) 13:01, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks so much for reviewing the article and passing it! Dofftoubab (talk) 01:26, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Fort Hampton (Alabama)
edit
On 26 July 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fort Hampton (Alabama), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Fort Hampton was constructed by the United States Army to warn Americans to leave and keep them from illegally settling in Chickasaw territory? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fort Hampton (Alabama). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Fort Hampton (Alabama)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Nomination of Seven Pines, Alabama for deletion
edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seven Pines, Alabama until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Nomination of Weed Crossroad, Alabama for deletion
edit The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weed Crossroad, Alabama until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Nomination of Crawford Fork, Alabama for deletion
edit A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Crawford Fork, Alabama, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crawford Fork, Alabama until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
edit | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
edit Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
editHello, Dofftoubab. Thank you for your work on Fort Madison (Alabama). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
editHello, Dofftoubab. Thank you for your work on Bunker Hill, Mississippi. User:Herpetogenesis, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Great work!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Herpetogenesis}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
The Bugle: Issue 206, June 2023
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 18:31, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 207, July 2023
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:58, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
editHello, Dofftoubab. Thank you for your work on Suqualena, Mississippi. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
The Bugle: Issue 208, August 2023
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:29, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
editNominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 209, September 2023
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:37, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 210, October 2023
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:26, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 211, November 2023
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 18:18, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Fort Stonewall
edit On 10 November 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fort Stonewall, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Fort Stonewall was considered a model of river defense? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fort Stonewall. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Fort Stonewall), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:03, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
edit Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Yelling Settlement, Alabama for deletion
edit A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yelling Settlement, Alabama, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yelling Settlement, Alabama until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Swift, Alabama for deletion
edit The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swift, Alabama until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Nomination of Bright Star, Alabama for deletion
edit A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bright Star, Alabama, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bright Star, Alabama until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 212, December 2023
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:59, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Hopewell, Blount County, Alabama for deletion
edit A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hopewell, Blount County, Alabama, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hopewell, Blount County, Alabama until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!
editVoting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
The article Prescott, Alabama has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
GNIS entry misclassified as a community when it was in reality just a post office. Searches done on Google and Google News Archive.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. बिनोद थारू (talk) 01:03, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- I added information about the community center, which was sold to the St. Clair County Commission in 2015. The site of the community center can be seen at this location on Google Maps. The community has multiple homes and at least two churches, both listed on Google Maps. I know a church doesn't make a community, but I feel two churches with the community name (Prescott Baptist and Prescott Holiness Church), along with a former community center, would qualify this as a community. Dofftoubab (talk) 01:32, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 213, January 2024
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 18:32, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 214, February 2024
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:09, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 215, March 2024
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:56, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 216, April 2024
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:08, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 217, May 2024
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 20:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 218, June 2024
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:43, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 219, July 2024
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:08, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 220, August 2024
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:17, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting for coordinators is now open!
editNominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 221, September 2024
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:57, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!
editVoting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 222, October 2024
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:02, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military history newcomer of the year and military historian of the year
editNominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2024 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:20, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
edit Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)