User talk:Jianhui67/Archive September 2013
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Jianhui67. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
|
July 2013, August 2013, September 2013 , October 2013, November 2013, December 2013, January 2014, February 2014, March 2014, April 2014, May 2014, June 2014, July 2014 |
Welcome to Wikipedia! Need a hand?
{{Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation}}
- I did not even submit any AfC. Why did you say that my submission was declined? Jianhui67 Talk 01:46, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
- Hmm, that's....strange. I think I may have accidentally clicked something when posting a comment at User talk:Jianhui67/My CVUA. Sorry about that! Theopolisme (talk) 01:52, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
You reverted the blanking of this article; a check of the history would have revealed that the editor you reverted was the only contributor of meaningful content, so tagging it for speedy deletion per author's request (G7) would have been the appropriate thing to do. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 17:08, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
- Oops sorry I did not check the page history and so I reverted it. Jianhui67 Talk 01:15, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Unknown title
You undid a delete I made on the 2-AG page, citing it as "vandalism". I am a medical school professor very knowledgeable of the subject. What I deleted was preliminary results that have not yet been peer reviewed. The following section (which I deleted and you reinstated) does NOT belong on Wikipedia. It also appears to highlight the work of a minor player in the field (I suspect Dr. Hanlon wrote this for self promotion). ONCE it is published, it can be cited (in a less grandstanding way - with just the facts and no mention of the people who did the work, except in the citation - that's the norm for scientific articles). Until it is published, please delete or rewrite so that the speculative nature of the unpublished work is more clearly evident.
Here's what I deleted: 2-AG, lack of sleep, and subsequent tendency to overeat[edit source | editbeta] In a Monday, June 24, 2013, online University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences "Science Life" blog news story article by Matt Wood (accessed Tuesday, July 16, 2013), due to results of a study by Dr. Erin Hanlon, Ph.D., a Research Associate at the University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, it was stated that,: "In preliminary results presented at the annual meeting of The Endocrine Society, Dr. Hanlon showed that subjects who slept just four-and-a-half hours a night had higher levels of a molecule called 2-arachidonoylglycerol that regulates appetite. The Huffington Post reports: “Past experimental studies show that sleep restriction increases hunger and appetite,” study researcher Dr. Erin Hanlon, Ph.D., who is a research associate at the University of Chicago’s Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, said in a statement. “The mechanism for overeating after inadequate sleep may be an elevation in this endocannabinoid molecule, called 2-arachidonoylglycerol, or 2-AG.” Dr. Hanlon’s study adds to the growing body of research on the topic, some from the University of Chicago, on the effects of poor sleep (sleep deprivation), especially as to how it affects our metabolism and increases insulin resistance, causes genetic changes in children and even regarding our sense of loneliness.[14] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.98.30.114 (talk) 19:50, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
- By right removing content without an explanation will have been considered as vandalism. Please at least provide an edit summary in the future to why you deleted the content. And also please sign your posts when you post messages or comments on talk pages. Thanks. Jianhui67 Talk 01:22, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
September 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Phines We$t may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- with [[Mike Dean]], co-signed by [[Interscope Records]]. Phines began working with Kanye West]] three years later after his
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:04, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Unknown title
Thank you for the note...i did send this justification to the wiki email, please don't delete this, we'll be working on it over the next few weeks...I'm a novice, sorry ...
Hi again-if the reason for potential deletion is lack of relevance?
//
Here's some reference material to show this is a substantial concept.thank you, Tim
- 1 Business Trend - Datification
Need for Datification over the next tens years http://www.datasciencecentral.com/profiles/blogs/demand-for-data-scientists-and-the-datification-of-business
Datification on youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfC-8Z0i4mo
Datification Defined
http://gemmyallen.com/tag/datification/
Datification sources http://www.pythian.com/resources/videos/the-age-of-datification/
Thank you,
Tim
Timothy Fowler
Original Message-----
From: Fowler, Timothy W CIV USA USFOR-A OCSDC Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2013 3:00 PM To: 'info-en@wikimedia.org' Subject: (U) Novice wanting to post correctly....
Hi wiki, Tim Fowler, from Afghanistan here. I have attempted to make a page called DATIFICATION...it is a recent term to show how businesses and life are growing more data centric...it seems I got the page up, but then got a warning? Did I do something wrong, please advise...I am new to this and am sorry Thank you,
Tim 2167699713
Timothy Fowler US Army CPI Master Black Belt USFOR-A / NKC APO AE 09356 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timothyfowler1 (talk • contribs) 11:44, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Unknown title
Thank you,for the information. In regards to the references Wikipedia stated that I had ten days to add the refrences. The article is still in the draft state. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tq2bstr8 (talk • contribs) 02:04, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Tq2bstr8, after you have added one reliable and verifiable reference to Julie Scott, you can delete the prod template. Jianhui67 Talk 02:25, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Help!
Hello Jianhui67
I am Hannah and i am a nadia oh fan. she has not been spotted or been on social media since late 2011 and i worries me, so i sent out a request for information the best way i knew how, by letting everyone know on wikipedia. This is a very stressful time for me, as leader of her fan club i would have thought she would let me know. i am so sad
Please don't delete my message! it is so important so we find her! i am so concerned
Thankyou for ready my message and hope school is going well :)
HAnnah :) :) :)
203.173.196.153 (talk) 09:22, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Hannah. For the second time you made that edit, it was not reverted by me. The edit was reverted by another person, who also warned the same thing as I did. Wikipedia articles is not the place to comment such things. And thank you for your comment about my school life. Thanks. Jianhui67 Talk 15:15, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Flarn2006. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Professor Dato Wira Dr. Khairil Annas Jusoh, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. flarn2006 [u t c] time: 05:51, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Miriam Makeba
Hi. My addition to Miriam Makeba's wikipedia memorial page was as follows. Under the heading Legacy and Death I chose to write about part of her legacy. I said "Her legacy is love." This was part of a memorial service held for all of time, because she was such a wonderful human. My goal was to let her also-immensely-respected-husband Hugh Masekela know that even as far away as in America, there are still very real parts of her love in current existence. If this was bad for Hugh Masekela to see, I still believe it was necessary, because sometimes memorial services make you cry, but sadness is just a temporary condition of happiness. Miriam Makeba's best performance in my opinion was one of her now-posted videos on youtube, of the song The lion sleeps tonite, or, h'-Wimboweyh, called for her artistic purposes, mbube. Not even lions deserve always to die. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.94.92.181 (talk) 16:56, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Hi 75.94.92.181, please at least elaborate your point and include a reliable and verifiable source to what you have written. Jianhui67 Talk 02:53, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Datification
Good day from Afghanistan, I addressed all deletion concerns (I thought?) there appeared a ... new .... "different" deletion notification...something to the effect of marketing campaign??? The two individuals I reference in the article are in the datification field BUT I do not know them? Should I take their quotes out? Seems that would hurt the credibility...I'm at a loss?? I work in Lean Six Sigma, not in IT, there is no marketing, just interest...Thanks for your patience, please advise? 180.94.73.12 Timothyfowler1 (talk) 20:09, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 September 2013
- WikiProject report: 18,464 Good Articles on the wall
- Featured content: Hurricane Diane and Van Gogh
- Technology report: What can Wikidata do for Wikipedia?
- Traffic report: Twerking, tragedy and TV
Talkback
Message added 00:44, 27 September 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Ross Hill00:44 27 Sep 2013 (UTC) 00:44, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 September 2013
- Traffic report: Look on Walter's works
- WikiProject report: Babel Series: GOOOOOOAAAAAAALLLLLLL!!!!!
- Featured content: Wikipedia takes the stage
Issues
Hi, Jianhui67. I'm glad to see you've been very active on wiki. I had responded to your query about Reflinks on my user talk but I hadn't heard back from you. Is there any help you still need?
I wanted to reach out to you about your edits at User talk:108.34.218.189. Per WP:TALK, users can remove comments from their own talk pages. I understand where you're coming from, keeping those notifications on the talk page so other users see them. We can't maintain those warnings as a type of scarlet letter of shame. Besides, the history tab holds all that info. That the user keeps deleting those notifications is tantamount to an admission of guilt and an administrator will see it that way when they ban same user. I don't want you to start an edit war of this sort of thing. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:23, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
- Oh. Have been busy these days with exams and I only have a little time to get to Wikipedia, and most of my works are in Commons. Perhaps wait till 3 October when all my exams have finished and I'm ready to edit more, so that you can train me with Reflinks? Thanks. Jianhui67 Talk 01:41, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
A revert
Hi Jianhui67, did you mean to do this? Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:59, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
- No. I reverted that dummy edit back. I was scrolling through your contributions page and accidentally pressed rollback on what you have reverted. Jianhui67 Talk 08:01, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
reply
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I thought you might have been a bit harsh with your revert's warning, so I pointed User talk:90.206.100.178 to the relevant guideline. In the future, maybe include it in your edit summary though... I don't really know how Huggle works however. I tried using Twinkle once, but that got annoying with not doing edit summaries or something, so I understand if this was caused by that. Thanks, DarkToonLinkHeyaah! 09:56, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
PLEASE HELP ME AGAINST THE ANTI-VANDALS. I am not a vandal. I was a good wikieditor. I just quit they are AFDing me improperly
Hi there. Can you help me? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.227.134.169 (talk) 11:53, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- From the edit history of Dennis Donaghy, it shows that you are engaging in an edit war. I can't help you if you are engaging in an edit war. Please achieve consensus by discussing about how you can improve the article, and not engaging in an edit war. See the message I posted on your talk page. Thanks. Jianhui67 Talk 12:01, 29 September 2013 (UTC)