Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Welcome!

edit
 
Welcome!

Hello, KTnow, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Burrobert (talk) 15:09, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks @Burrobert – yes I read a bunch of these articles and guides already when I first registered. I might have to go back to them though, it's quite a lot to ingest! I didn't know about the tildes, thanks for pointing that out. And I'd missed the sandbox, that will be very handy.
On the task center, yes I've had a look at the suggestions there but some of the suggested articles felt very far from my expertise. Initially at least, I feel more comfortable editing articles which are in line with my areas of knowledge. I know about think tanks and UK public policy (I used to work in that sector), and also European and Middle Eastern history (through studies and personal interest). So those were the kind of articles I'm looking for. I noticed a few articles already which were out of date, which is actually what prompted me to register.
Thanks for taking the time, I appreciate it! KTnow (talk) 12:55, 6 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
In case you missed it, I posted a link to a tutorial on the Chatham House page in response to your enquiry. Hope it helps. Burrobert (talk) 13:00, 6 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Perfect – will have a look when I get a mo. Thank you, appreciated. KTnow (talk) 13:41, 6 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Noor Abdulmajeed

edit

Article created in 2016 and has existed without references since then (aside from social media accounts like FB, Twitter). Article should probably be AFDed. 69.117.172.84 (talk) 01:00, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Are you suggesting I should have a look at updating this page? KTnow (talk) 22:11, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
No. I am thinking it should be AFDed as it has been unsourced since 2016 and the only remotely reliable reflinks I was able to find via Google search were this one and this one but perhaps I missed something. I brought this to your attention as you are on the WikiProject Biography team. Yours. 65.88.88.56 (talk) 23:32, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for bringing it to my attention. I'd be happy to have a look at it over the break. One last thing – would you mind spelling out what 'AFded' means? Still learning all the terms! KTnow (talk) 11:30, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
AFD means Articles for Deletion. 65.88.88.56 (talk) 23:15, 20 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Asthma + Lung UK moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Asthma + Lung UK. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 14:12, 5 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. I'm still working on it! KTnow (talk) 15:19, 5 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Please see WP:THREE and WP:NCORP. It has the notability requirements listed for organizations. Happy editing <3 Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 16:12, 5 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you @Jeraxmoira. I've updated the draft article, I'm done (for today, at least). My starting point was that articles on Asthma UK and the British Lung Foundation already existed, i.e. they had both passed the notability test in the past. This felt like a reasonable indicator that Asthma + Lung UK – which is the product of a merger between these two organisations – would likely be notable enough for a page.
In addition to this, I feel that the organisation's recent influence of government policy by shaping the parliamentary debate should be enough. Happy to discuss this, however!
The alternative, though, is either to leave two out-of-date articles (in that these organisations are now both defunct). Or to delete them. I wouldn't feel comfortable recommending to delete Asthma UK in particular, given the influence it has had historically in getting asthma recognised as an issue across society. I'm open to advice though :-) KTnow (talk) 19:00, 5 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Notability cannot be inherited WP:INHERITORG. However, in the case of Asthma and Lung UK merging, then I would advise you to make a merge request here WP:PROPMERGE. If you are not familiar with making a merge request, then I would advise you to ask for help at the Wikipedia:Teahouse. Articles about notable companies/organizations will not be deleted even if they become defunct. Based on my assessment, merging the article and adding the latest content to the merged article is the way to go. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 19:38, 5 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi @Jeraxmoira, I've finally found some time to look into this. I've now performed the merger, with the assistance of a few other editors. I've (hopefully) addressed the issues you had tagged the article with – i.e. I've sourced references from third-party publications where possible, and have made the tone more neutral. (I agree that some of my initial copy did probably sound too 'marketing-y', though this was to justify notability – it's a delicate balance!) Can you take a look at Asthma + Lung UK? And, if you're satisfied that these issues have been addressed, maybe remove the tags? Or happy to discuss if you think it still needs work. KTnow (talk) 12:01, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Matt Chorley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Broadcaster. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

That's ok, thanks for flagging. Noted! KTnow (talk) 11:27, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chris Stark (climate expert) (July 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 15:26, 13 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, KTnow! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 15:26, 13 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chris Stark (climate expert) has been accepted

edit
 
Chris Stark (climate expert), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 19:15, 7 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply