Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Owen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 13:41, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony Owen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My searches have simply found nothing better than this] and this,and that's basically the best I've found since others I've found are by far unacceptable. SwisterTwister talk 07:11, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:13, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Magic-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:13, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:13, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 May 30. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:32, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Probably delete – From source searches, the subject appears to fall short of meeting WP:BASIC at this time. I found this cover story in Vanish magazine, but cannot access the content, and this book source provides a paragraph about the subject. Highbeam search results appear to only provide passing mentions (e.g. [1]). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:04, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no evidence of Notability Samat lib (talk) 22:01, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete run of the mill magician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:15, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - only passing mentions. Tom29739 ^[talk] 18:37, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.