Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Berandal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (WP:NAC) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:58, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Berandal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:V and WP:CRYSTAL. Sources are exclusively blogs, gossip sheets and social media; no WP:RS found in Google search. May be suitable for userfication until it meets WP:MOVIE. Miniapolis 19:28, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why not just merge or at least redirect to the first movie? Candleabracadabra (talk) 22:01, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The Jakarta Post (largest English-language newspaper in Indonesia) has at least two articles about it (1, 2), and the largest newspaper in Indonesia, Kompas, has several articles, including "Shooting of the Raid 2 Berandal Finishes" and "Sequel to The Raid Promises Many Surprises". Some WP:BEFORE, please? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:28, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, looking at the sources already in the article, my sense of professionalism is gravely insulted. Twitch might not be a well-known site, but it seems trusted for international films. The Hollywood Reporter is quite solid, as is The Jakarta Post. To have these two publications demoted to "gossip sheets" shows a complete lack of understanding of the industry and a lack of interest in finding out. Per WP:SPS, Tweets from the creators can be used to fill in information if it's not available anywhere else (though that doesn't count towards notability). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:33, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Although the Jakarta Post is a RS, both articles are pre-release buzz; I still think it's WP:TOOSOON for a separate article. A redirect to The Raid: Redemption would preserve this article's history, or you might be willing to userfy it until it meets WP:MOVIE. All the best, Miniapolis 15:15, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - WP:MOVIE supports having an article on films before release if coverage is adequate, so long as principal photography has commenced (as it clearly has here). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:18, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Candleabracadabra (talk) 17:56, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:12, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:12, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - satisfies WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 20:53, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Meets Wikipedia:Notability (films) and WP:GNG. Source examples include: [1], [2]. Also, here's a short article: [3]. Northamerica1000^(talk) 05:43, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Has received significant coverage in reliable sources, thus passing WP:NFILM. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 22:27, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.