Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olivér Fenyvesi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 21:49, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Olivér Fenyvesi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

His 3 mins of professional football might give a presumption of notability under WP:NFOOTBALL but my WP:BEFORE search found nothing that could contribute towards WP:GNG. He has spent almost all of his career playing in the amateur third tier. During a Hungarian search, I found this to be the best source, which is way short of the mark. There is strong consensus that failing GNG is far more important than a trivial NFOOTBALL pass. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:11, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:13, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:13, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:13, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:14, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - failing GNG is far more crucial than scraping by on NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 20:16, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It is time we stopped being footballpedia and started applying the GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:08, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails in GNG. Setreis (talk) 16:53, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't meet the notability standards yet Jenyire2 07:18, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.