Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahrul Hakim

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Might well pass NFOOTY, but consensus is that he fails GNG. Fenix down (talk) 15:51, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shahrul Hakim

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has played 94 mins over 2 games to constitute a relatively weak passing of WP:NFOOTBALL. Google searches only show trivial coverage, such as appearing at the end of a BH article, in the squad list.

Similarly, searches centred on Malaysian sources yield nothing better. Passing mentions were found in match reports for The Point, Malay Mail, Malaysia Gazette and a few others. None of this shows a passing of WP:GNG and there is clear consensus that such articles that only show a weak passing of NSPORTS and no significant coverage should be deleted from Wikipedia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:25, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:25, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:25, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:25, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:28, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one or two appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 16:09, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep passes NFOOTY and still has an active career.--Ortizesp (talk) 01:41, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete We wait until someone clearly meets inclusion criteria to create an article, we do not create articles just because things might develop in the next few years to make someone notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:18, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.