Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Jewish Women

Latest comment: 4 days ago by Lajmmoore in topic 20% women's biographies on English Wikipedia

Template

edit

I've created a barebones project template at Template:WPJW. An appropriate image would be nice, although finding something that captures the broad scope of this project might be tricky.Kschlot1 (talk) 02:15, 8 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Just to let you know

edit

I have changed the default sort so that this wikiproject shows up next to other women's projects in Category:WikiProjects relevant for countering systemic bias. Please notify me if you have any concerns. XOttawahitech (talk) 01:45, 22 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Category:Jewish women

edit

I thought I would start traversing Category:Jews to locate women who can be added to Category:Jewish women (to make it easier to add them to this project). The first article I stumbled on was Emily Bazelon. After I added her to the category, it occured to me to check to see if she is identified as Jewish in the text of the article, and to my surprise she was not. Just wondering... XOttawahitech (talk) 01:12, 6 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

It's not cited in the WP article, but this interview with the Arizona Jewish Post[1] makes clear Bazelon is of Jewish descent and belongs to a Reform synagogue. This could be added to the article. Kschlot1 (talk) 13:15, 6 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Assessment table

edit

I am slowly adding this project's banner to Jewish women article talkpages and am wondering where the assessment table is for this wikiproject. Thanks in advance, XOttawahitech (talk) 15:39, 6 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

As yet, we don't have an assessment table. It's on my to-do list to add one and put it into the banner template, adapted from the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women's_History/Assessment#Quality_scale - I will try to get to it soon we won't have banner-tagged pages without ratings. Kschlot1 (talk) 16:04, 6 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

I've added an assessment option to the template and an assessment page -- let me know if I missed anything (this is pretty deep wiki territory for me). Kschlot1 (talk) 17:18, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Good luck

edit

Good luck on the new project. i just added Leah Vincent to your project, as well as the larger judaism project. look forward to seeing an assessment table. I may try to add some pages to this project as i think of it.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 16:34, 16 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Comment on the WikiProject X proposal

edit

Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject X is live!

edit
 

Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Notice and invitation

edit
  1. There is a redirect discussion that may be of interest to this group.
  2. Have you heard of the Kaffeeklatsch? It is a test area for women to hear and support each other. The idea came about as a result of a discussion at meta regarding my IdeaLab proposal (yet open) for WikiProject Women.
Now that the klatsch has survived an MfD and WMF legal has said that it does not violate the non discrimination policy,[2] I am looking for women editors who might like to join.
Although I have started a couple of discussions, they are not urgent. For now, the "Please introduce yourself" discussion is more important! I want to take it slow at first and build a small group before trying to address heavy topics or come up with big goals. For now, the klatsch is there as a sort of refuge. I hope you will consider joining, and invite other women editors, too, if you wish.

--Lightbreather (talk) 16:01, 12 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

You're invited! Women in Red World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Leadership

edit
You are invited!World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in LeadershipCome and join us remotely!
World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Leadership
Dates: 7 to 20 September 2015
 

The Virtual Edit-a-thon, hosted by Women in Red, will allow all those keen to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in Leadership to participate. As it is a two-week event, inexperienced participants will be able to draw on the assistance of more experienced editors while creating, translating or improving articles on women who are (or have been) prominent in leadership. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome. RSVP and find more details →here← --Ipigott (talk) 09:44, 30 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

You're invited! Smithsonian APA Center & Women in Red virtual edit-a-thon on APA women

edit
Asian Pacific American Women World Virtual Edit-a-thon
 
"The Smithsonian APA Center invites you to attend the 2nd annual Wikipedia APA an editathon for cultural presence, which will be held during the month of September 2015. We are thrilled to invite you to Wikipedia APA, an editing event for improving and increasing the presence of cultural, historic, and artistic information on Wikipedia pertaining to Asian Pacific American ("APA") experiences. The second Wikipedia editathon dedicated to APA content, this project will occur as physical events during September 2015... as well as remotely, with participants taking part from all throughout the world."
Did you Know that 15% of the biographies on Wikipedia are about women? Not impressed? WiR focuses on "content gender gap". If you'd like to help contribute articles on women and women's works, we warmly welcome you! WiR will be hosting one of this world virtual edit-a-thon. The 3-day event will focus on improving Wikipedia's coverage of Asian Pacific American women and their works (books, paintings, and so on).

--Rosiestep (talk) 03:23, 1 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Re-organization of WikiProject Women

edit

There currently is a discussion about the future organization of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women and several other women-related Wikiprojects and taskforces at the above link. Some aspects may be of interests to editors of this project and your participation in the discussion would be appreciated. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 12:09, 13 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

You're invited! Women in Red World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Architecture

edit
You are invited! Join us remotely!

World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Architecture

 
  • Dates: 15 to 25 October 2015
  • Location: Worldwide/virtual/online event
  • Host/Facilitator: Women in Red (WiR): Did you know that only 15% of the biographies on Wikipedia are about women? WiR focuses on "content gender gap". If you'd like to help contribute articles on women and women's works, we warmly welcome you!
  • Sponsor: Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum in association with Beverly Willis Architecture Foundation, Women in Design, and Wikiproject Women Wikipedia Design
  • Event details: This is a virtual edit-a-thon hosted by WiR in parallel with a series of "physical" Guggenheim edit-a-thons. It will allow all those keen to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women in architecture and design to participate. The campaign aims to further the goals of Ada Lovelace Day for STEM, and Art+Feminism for art, in a field that by its nature combines both. As the virtual edit-a-thon stretches over a week and a half, inexperienced participants will be able to draw on the assistance of more experienced editors while creating, translating or improving articles on women who are (or have been) prominent in this field. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome.
  • RSVP and learn more: →here←--Ipigott (talk) 14:42, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

You're invited! Women in Red World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Science

edit
You are invited! Join us remotely!

World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Science

 
 
  • Dates: 8 to 29 November 2015
  • Location: Worldwide/virtual/online event
  • Host/Facilitator: Women in Red (WiR) in collaboration with Women scientists: Did you know that only 15% of the biographies on Wikipedia are about women? WiR focuses on "content gender gap". If you'd like to help contribute articles on women and women's works, we warmly welcome you!
  • Sponsor: New York Academy of Sciences
  • Event details: This is a virtual edit-a-thon hosted by WiR in parallel with a "phyisical" event during the afternoon of Sunday, November 22 in New York City. It will allow all those keen to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women in science to participate. As the virtual edit-a-thon stretches over three weeks, new participants will be able to draw on the assistance of more experienced editors while creating, translating or improving articles on women who are (or have been) prominent in the field. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome.
  • RSVP and learn more: →here←--Ipigott (talk) 11:36, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

You're invited! Women in Red World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Religion

edit
You are invited! Join us remotely!

World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Religion

 
  • Dates: 5 to 15 December 2015
  • Location: Worldwide/virtual/online event
  • Host: Women in Red (WiR): Did you know that only 15% of the biographies on Wikipedia are about women? WiR focuses on "content gender gap". If you'd like to help contribute articles on women and women's works, we warmly welcome you!
  • Event details: This is a virtual edit-a-thon hosted by WiR. It will allow all those keen to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women in reigion to participate. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome.
  • RSVP and learn more: →here←--Ipigott (talk) 11:05, 3 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to a virtual editathon on Women in Music

edit
Women in Music
 
 
  • 10 to 31 January 2016
  • Please join us in the worldwide virtual edit-a-thon hosted by Women in Red.

--Ipigott (talk) 10:05, 5 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Women in Jewish History 2016 NYC and virtual edit-a-thons

edit

Hi @Bibliosaurusrex:! There are two edit-a-thons in the works that I wanted to let you know about. First, on June 5th, there will be a Women in Jewish History 2016 edit-a-thon, much like the one we held in 2014. We're also collaborating with Women in Red on a virtual edit-a-thon on Jewish women for the whole month of June (Celebrating Women in Jewish History). Both link out to WikiProject Jewish Women for editing ideas. Would it be okay if both of these were listed in your events section, or otherwise indicated/communicated to participants in WikiProject Jewish Women? --Lange.lea (talk) 12:17, 22 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to Women in Architecture & Women in Archaeology editathons

edit
 
 


October 2016

Women in Architecture & Women in Archaeology editathons
Faciliated by Women in Red

 

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Ipigott (talk) 15:30, 25 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

January 2017 at Women in Red

edit
 
 


January 2017

Women Philosophers & Women in Education online editathons
Faciliated by Women in Red

 

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Ipigott (talk) 12:22, 30 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to Women in Red's Role Models editathon on Women's Colleges

edit

Please forward this invitation to all potentially interested contacts

 
Welcome to... Role Models meetup and online editathon
Facilitated by Women in Red
Help us to spread the news
  • 8 March 2017: In-person meetup at Newnham College, Cambridge University
     
     
  • Whole of March: worldwide multi-language online edithon for all
  • Focus: Notable women from women's colleges and related institutions
  • Inform your communities of the need for their support.
  • Contribute in English or in your own language

Apologies for cross-posting and sending in English
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 13:26, 22 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia Edit-a-Thon in Portland, Oregon: Jewish Women Artists (March 8)

edit

On March 8 (International Women's Day), and as part of the Art+Feminism project, Shoshana Gugenheim and the Oregon Jewish Museum and Center for Holocaust Education will be hosting a Wikipedia edit-a-thon to create and improve articles about Jewish women artists. Click here for more information. You can also express interest or suggest article to create or improve here. Remote participation is also welcome! ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:37, 17 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Women's History Month 2018 at Women in Red

edit
 
Welcome to Women in Red's March 2018 worldwide online editathons.
 
 


Historically, our March event has been one of the biggest offerings of the year. This year, we are collaborating with two other wiki communities. Our article campaign is the official on-line/virtual node for Art+Feminism. Our image campaign supports the Whose Knowledge? initiative. Women's History Month 2018

Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Ipigott (talk) 11:16, 21 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Roseanne Barr GAR

edit

I've started WP:Good article reassessment/Roseanne Barr/1 and welcome input from others. Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:19, 31 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Belle de Jour (writer) listed at Requested moves

edit
 

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Belle de Jour (writer) to be moved to Brooke Magnanti. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 08:00, 12 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

RfC at Roseanne Barr

edit

There is an RfC at the Roseanne Barr talk page found here that members of this project might be interested in taking part in. -- ψλ 01:59, 30 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Women in Green – call for participants

edit
 

Hello all – I'd like to invite you to join Women in Green, WikiProject Women's article improvement department. The department has not been an active project in the past, but we are now working on kickstarting new collaborative work between editors to improve existing articles about women and women's works. If this sounds like something you're interested in, please add your name to Women in Green's list of active participants! You can check out more details of our discussions so far on the Women in Green talk page. Alanna the Brave (talk) 23:49, 9 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Women in Red - a proposed User Group

edit

Having worked for 2 years editing articles for Women In Red, a group of organizers have concluded that sourcing is one of the biggest hurdles in creating articles on women and non-binary genders. Though it is true that a lot of sourcing simply doesn’t exist, it is also true that there are sources, but we have no access to them. As these groups did not typically become subjects for academic study until the 1970s, many of the sources are not on line or are behind paywalls. Failure to include women and non-binary people in the encyclopedia presents a one-dimensional view of society and history. To address those issues, we are forming a new User Group aimed at referencing and support for like-minded groups and would appreciate your input or input from your supporters in our organizational process. See link: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_Women_in_Red MauraWen (talk) 09:20, 10 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red November 2018

edit

In November 2018, Women in Red is focusing on Religion.--Ipigott (talk) 12:25, 2 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

FAC for Working Group (resistance organization)

edit

The Working Group was a Holocaust resistance organization led by a woman, Gisi Fleischmann, whose contribution has been discussed in terms of gender studies. All comments are welcome. Catrìona (talk) 22:24, 9 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Question about nationality and identity at Hannah Arendt

edit

There is a perpetual disagreement happening at this article on how best to identify Hannah Arendt. The current version of the article refers to her as German, which in her writings she identified as. However, she was also Jewish and in her writings she also self-identifies as Jewish -- in fact, she states in one essay that if she has to be identified as one thing only, it would be Jewish, given the scope of her work. Further complicating things is her residence in the US for decades. I just reverted a convoluted phrasing borrowed from the German Wikipedia (although it wasn't accurately translated): "German and American Jewish". No consensus has ever been reached and I believe the article just defaults to German at this point. I cannot find any guidelines on the proper way to identify someone who is unambiguously Jewish but is also identified as a nationality. It appears that local article-based conventions apply, so there is little or no consistency. I was hoping that someone in this WikiProject would be able to provide an answer. freshacconci (✉) 21:06, 13 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

RfC notice: Jewish religious clothing

edit

A Request for Comment that may be relevant to this WikiProject is open at Talk:Jewish religious clothing § Request for Comment. Ibadibam (talk) 05:32, 24 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

A new newsletter directory is out!

edit

A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.

– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Emma Lyon (poet) listed at Requested moves

edit
 

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Emma Lyon (poet) to be moved to Emma Lyon. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 19:47, 14 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Mary, mother of Jesus listed at Requested moves

edit
 

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Mary, mother of Jesus to be moved to Virgin Mary. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 20:29, 6 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

C. Doris Hellman

edit

I have created an article for a subject listed by this project as in need of creation, C. Doris Hellman. However, although I can document that she was a long-term supporter of the Jewish Foundation for Education of Girls, that her husband was president of the Jewish Guild for the Blind, and that she is listed in the Encyclopedia of Jewish Women, I don't have a source explicitly saying she was Jewish, and so I have not put that into the article about her. If anyone can dig up such a source, that would be helpful. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:01, 26 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool

edit

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Identifying who is Jewish

edit

I was wondering how do you define who is Jewish on Wikipedia since being Jewish seems to cross between religious and ethnic/cultural categories (i left the same post on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism). What would be sufficient sourcing? I have searched all the relevant help pages but cannot seem to find a definitive answer. Assigning religious identity to living people requires self-identification (Wikipedia:BLPCAT) while deceased people may be identified without self-identification (e.g. "services were held at Temple xxxx"). Being Jewish as an ethnicity does not seem to require such a high hurdle (Wikipedia:ETHNICRACECAT). I was told that in order to designate a person as Jewish I would need multiple irrevocable sources that specifically state that the reference is referring to ethnicity in order to include. As most citations do not specify whether the subject is Jewish by faith or descent, they would not be sufficient. For example, Edits to Maurice Kremer (1824–1907) have been removed since I do not have multiple sources and the one I do have does not specify whether it refers to religion or ethnicity.

  • "Maurice Kremer: Very Early Pioneer Jewish Merchant and Civil Servant of Los Angeles". Jewish Museum of the American West. Retrieved April 9, 2018.

and Evelyn Danzig Haas have been removed despite having an interview where she states she was confirmed and her parents attended temple during the high holy days

and despite her funeral being held at Congregation Emanu-El (San Francisco)

For living people, I am told that I need to demonstrate a verified consensus of reliable sources that indicate that their being Jewish is key to their notability in addition to self-identification. see Bruce Berkowitz with three sources deemed insufficient

If this is the standard, it seems that there will be very few Jewish biographies left (I was perusing "Jewish writers" and very few would stand up to this level of scrutiny).Patapsco913 (talk) 18:51, 31 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

  • @Patapsco913: I don't think this project is very active and it's been a while since your question, but in case it hasn't been answered then you are right, those restrictions you mention are far too high. I came here today to look at the talkpage banner in terms of importance assessment and some of that is relevant to your question: any living person who has self-identified as Jewish either culturally/religiously or ethnically, and any deceased person identified as Jewish, is included. The article is a higher level of importance if their Jewish identity holds some significance, but it does not have to be "key" to their notability - that would limit a Jewish identity to people like Anne Frank, and rabbis and theologians, which is backwards thinking since most Jewish people are those practicing under rabbis! For the example I came here looking at - Dianna Agron - we can see multiple sources confirming she is both ethnically and religiously Jewish, and there are sources on the relevance of this identity in terms of her career, but since her Wikipedia page was created back in 2006 before her religion was widely known, and her most famous role is a Christian, it's not the reason she is notable. By that measure, even Mary, mother of Jesus would not be allowed. So if you have sources making it explicit the person is Jewish, you can use it, just don't put it in the infobox unless there's a good reason. Kingsif (talk) 11:06, 13 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

FYI

edit

A discussion of Lists of Jewish people on the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Coffee removing Categories and Lists Inappropriately has been started. I would imagine it will also encompass what sourcing is required to define someone as Jewish.Patapsco913 (talk) 14:21, 31 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Carolyn Goodman (politician) listed at Requested moves

edit
 

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Carolyn Goodman (politician) to be moved to Carolyn Goodman. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 05:02, 26 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Jessica Krug academic scandal listed at Requested moves

edit
 

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Jessica Krug academic scandal to be moved. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 13:06, 10 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Infoboxes

edit

Hi, I started adding infoboxes based on the project's requests and they are being reverted due to an editor's dislike of them. I wanted to let you know. I'd like guidance on how to proceed. I'd like to continue adding them. Thanks. Nashona (talk) 16:11, 17 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Scope of Project? - Should all articles on Template:Women in Judaism be linked to this WP Project?

edit

Hi All,

I've recently made Template:Women in Judaism as a navbox for general articles that were linked on the women in Judaism page (e.g. articles on Jewish women's history, religious roles, customs, etc.).

Currently, I have around 50 pages linked, and I thought to link the WP project on each of those pages. But I want to confirm that the scope of this project is meant to include those... Please advise!

Thanks, I.am.a.qwerty (talk) 13:44, 28 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Rashida Jones listed at Requested moves

edit
 

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Rashida Jones to be moved to Rashida Jones (actress). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 02:02, 13 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Margot Heumann listed at Requested moves

edit
 

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Margot Heumann to be moved to Margot Heuman. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 23:35, 26 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Mary, mother of Jesus listed at Requested moves

edit
 

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Mary, mother of Jesus to be moved to Mary. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 03:01, 11 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Lee Grant listed at Requested moves

edit
 

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Lee Grant to be moved to Lee Grant (American actress). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 23:17, 24 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Good Article Editathon event in October 2022

edit
 

Hello WikiProject Jewish Women:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Editathon event in October 2022!

Running from October 1 to 31, 2022, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event – Wildcard Edition! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to any and all women and women's works during the event period. Want to improve an article about a Bollywood actress? Go for it. A pioneering female scientist? Absolutely. An award-winning autobiography by a woman? Yes! GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to receive a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Goldsztajn (talk) 01:18, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Project-independent quality assessments

edit

Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.

No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.

However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 20:44, 11 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Peer review for Elisabeth Geleerd

edit

A peer review has been opened for Elisabeth Geleerd, an article under the scope of this WikiProject, to potentially prepare it for featured article candidacy. Interested editors are invited to participate at the discussion page. Vaticidalprophet 23:03, 11 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Gender and Jewish studies listed at Requested moves

edit
 

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Gender and Jewish studies to be moved to Gender identity in Judaism. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 14:02, 10 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Kidnapping of Naama Levy listed at Requested moves

edit
 

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Kidnapping of Naama Levy to be moved to Capture of Naama Levy. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 08:51, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Requested move at Talk:Madonna#Requested move 1 June 2024

edit
 

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Madonna#Requested move 1 June 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Dawid2009 (talk) 15:00, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Elsa, Princess of Liechtenstein listed at Requested moves

edit
 

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Elsa, Princess of Liechtenstein to be moved to Elsa von Gutmann. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 13:19, 14 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

20% women's biographies on English Wikipedia

edit

Hello friends, if you follow Wikiproject Women in Red you might have seen that the proportion of women's biographies on English Wikipedia just tipped over 20% and it's a fatastic achievement for everyone!!! I'd like to do a post on Diff (the Wikimedia Foundation's blog) about it and would love to add perspectives from this project (as well as others) - a draft is here, please please add to it. If you can edit it before, I'm hoping to post something 18:00 UTC on 21 Dec Lajmmoore (talk) 14:53, 20 December 2024 (UTC)Reply