Talk:USS Enterprise (NCC-1701-E)

What is the difference between the USS Enterprise E Insurrection and the USS Enterprise E First Contact by Playmates?

Another image

Image:EnterpriseE.jpg --Christopherlin 08:21, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Several years?

Someone rewrote the section detailed the gap between the events of Generations and First Contact to several years, but wasn't it merely two years, as Generations was set in 2371 (the TNG events), and First Contact set in 2373? PlasticBeat 18:13, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Warp Speed

Please do not post a maximum warp speed without a source. Indeed warp 8 was heard as a command, but it was not said it was the maximum speed and there are no ready sources saying warp 8 is the max. (a warp 8 max speed would also make flagship E as one of the slowest ships in the Federation) Please cite your references, thank you.

Wikipedia is out of universe - the maximum observed speed by the viewer *is* warp 8. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 10:46, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus -- what is it about this one page that has wingnuts changing the speed thing? --EEMeltonIV 19:46, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The official Paramount specs guide titled, "Star Trek: Ships of the Line" , ISBN: 1416532439, lists the Enterprise-E's maximum sustainable warp at 9.985.

That's licensed merchandise, and as Paramount have stated that sort of stuff is non-canon (ala unverifiable) thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 08:47, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The author, Michael Okuda was a graphic design and technical consultant on the staff for Star Trek TNG. He and Rick Sternbach advised the script-writers of on various TNG-era Star Trek series on the technology used throughout the Star Trek universe such as the transporters and the warp drive. To me that is VERY "verifiable". —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.126.182.19 (talk) 10:44, 4 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]