User talk:TheStarman

Hello TheStarman! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! —EncMstr 15:30, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Attribution • Neutral point of view • Notability Conflict of interest • Autobiography Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Citing sources • Footnotes Image use policy • Copyrights • Fair use External links • Spam • Vandalism Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry What Wikipedia is not • Deletion policy

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The "perfect" article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Welcome!

Hi,

just noticed your edit to endianness and thought to have a look at your user page. I see that you are a programmer as well, so we might have many common interests. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page, or reply here, if you feel we can work together on some (C++) project or Wikipedia article. Or for whatever reason you might like :-)

Cheers, Gennaro Prota ^•Talk 09:50, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gennaro, I've been unemployed for some years now, so should be looking for a job instead of doing this! I've never been paid as a programmer, so have very little work experience doing that, but still might be able to add something to a project... have worked with TestDisk a great deal. Daniel B. Sedory 09:55, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, yes, I see :-) Good luck with your search, BTW. It's not like we have to start something immediately, anyway. I think it's good to know that we can contact each other, now or in the future :-) Truth is, both Wikipedia and "hobby" programming projects are a lot more interesting than many paid jobs… —Gennaro Prota ^•Talk 10:06, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Say Gennaro, do you know how (if possible) one can turn their Wiki login into working for other Wiki LANGUAGE pages, so we don't need many diff. logins?! Daniel B. Sedory 10:20, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late reply: I disconnected before getting your question. I think it is still necessary to login separately to each Wiki. There have been discussions about a unified login mechanism (including Wiktionary and Wikicommons) but AFAIK that hasn't been implemented yet. —Gennaro Prota ^•Talk 16:48, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fdisk (Unix)

Hey, just wanted to let you know that since you are the only editor of this article, you can request speedy-deletion by following the directions at WP:CSD and adding a {{db-author}} tag to it. FrozenPurpleCube 03:50, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hi,

I am a newer user to wikipedia and was wondering if I could ask for your input on my article Sector slipping. I noticed that you have worked on other computer related articles and thought you may be able to help me.

Thanks! Fanax 21:34, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fanax, it seems interesting... though I do wonder: Couldn't (shouldn't?) it be merged into the main article Hard disk drive? Other than that: I would divide the content into at least two (and maybe three) main sections:

1. What happens before a disk is truly low-level formatted. And you should know that until one is, there is no such thing as a 'block' or 'sector' capable of holding data; unless we're discussing something like a floppy disk or a very old HDD which uses CHS logic to physically access its blocks (sectors).

2. What can happen after a disk is truly low-level formatted. Can "sector slipping" still be applied at that time?

3. Possibly what happens if "bad sectors" are encountered after a disk has been PARTITIONED (which is what some people mistakenly call 'low-level' formatting) and then has data added to many sectors on the disk (usually as an OS and user data).

In parts of your article, you seem to be using the word 'sector' too loosely, in that we do not know exactly what you mean. Perhaps you can try to specify if it's a physical area on a hard disk (that might not even be used as a raw block for data after low-level formatting), or if it's a block of user's data that could become corrupted later on. We could, of course, reword things, add reference numbers in the text, etc. etc. Daniel B. Sedory 23:07, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Master Boot Record

The closest thing to an authoritative reference for the lowest usable memory location is probably Ralf Brown's Interrupt List, [1]. Specifically, the file memory.lst gives usages for various memory locations. Location 0x500 is used by the BIOS Print Screen function, so it is not available to the OS. The bytes 0x501-0x5ff look like they might be used by different versions of MS-DOS, so it might be that the lowest usable location for the operating system is 0x501, rather than 0x600, although nearly everyone uses 0x600, which is the address the MBR is normally relocated to.

210.18.107.2

Hello, and thank you for the note on my talk page. In the future, if you find someone who is actively vandalizing, you should report them at WP:AIV. This page is regularly monitored by administrators. Thank you for helping fight vandalism on Wikipedia. Regards, Accurizer (talk) 03:01, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for watch over the hexadecimal article

Hello. Thanks a lot to correct vandalism and typos to my contribution to the hexadecimal article (I'm not a native english speaker). I suposse you think that, apart of the typos, my paraghaphs enhanced the article, so I'll feel rewarded if you learnt some things more about the topic. Yours.Ricardo Cancho Niemietz (talk) 13:20, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Ricardo. Gotta go to work now. Daniel B. Sedory (talk) 17:00, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. It's a mess. Way too complicated. There's a Wiki shortcut for this kind of article, but I can't remember it. It means that dozens (hundreds) have folks have come by and added their bit to it, without regard for the overall flow and structure. I'm working on a cleaned up version now. —EncMstr 07:08, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:06-02-05-EMBR-A.png missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:06-02-05-EMBR-A.png is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:26, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:06-02-05-embr-entry-1.png missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:06-02-05-embr-entry-1.png is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:29, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:06-02-05-embr-entry-2.png missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:06-02-05-embr-entry-2.png is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:37, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Malbolge program

Hi, the program you posted on Talk:Malbolge seems to be a slightly mangled version of the Hello World! from Wikipedia's own article. --Ørjan (talk) 10:12, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Ørjan. I saw your comments on the article's Talk:Malbolge page days ago, before noticing what you'd written here. I'm posting something on that page again now. Daniel B. Sedory (talk) 02:27, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

EBR and Partitions

Is it possible to have overlapping partitions and if so how?

I read somewhere that it is possible to have overlapping partitions in the extended partition i.e. by editing the EBR is this correct?

The last two partitions in the EBR are empty, is it done by adding a partition within this part of the partition table in the EBR? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhoni07 (talk • contribs) 21:12, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's quite easy using a hexadecimal disk editor to create many different dangerous situations! Having overlapping partitions may also be called illegal; according to the rules for creating them. If you do create overlapping partitions, you will have conflicts within one or more file systems that you format those partitions with! Only one file system could be healthy at a given time, the other one (or more) having some of its/their data overwritten by the healthy one.

The rules for EBR partition tables are: Only the first two entries are usable (and they are not really separate partition table entries to begin with; read the article on their uses), the last two are to be zero-filled, but even if they weren't, most utilities will only use the data in the first two entries anyway! Daniel B. Sedory (talk) 22:13, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilinks

The problem is that Wikimedia software attaches special meanings to many common punctuation marks, from square brackets to parentheses to long dashes. Thus, if you want to link to an article title or section header that includes any of several such symbols, you have to substitute the appropriate code for that symbol rather than the symbol itself. Am I making sense? --Orange Mike | Talk 22:22, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Mike, I actually realized this almost as soon as I'd posted the question, but you answered here before I could DELETE it from the page - which I'd done before seeing this.

Daniel B. Sedory (talk) 23:17, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, TheStarman. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]