View source for Wikipedia:External links/Noticeboard

{{pp-vandalism|small=yes}}
[[Category:Wikipedia noticeboards]] 
[[Category:Wikipedia dispute resolution]]
[[Category:Non-talk pages that are automatically signed|{{PAGENAME}}]]
{{Archives|collapsed=yes|image=none|search=no}}
{{/Header}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|maxarchivesize = 200K
|counter = 26
|algo = old(60d)
|minthreadsleft=4
|archive = Wikipedia:External links/Noticeboard/Archive %(counter)d
}} __NEWSECTIONLINK__ <!-- Add new questions at the bottom of the page -->

== Bot? Sock? Farm? ==

As I've said over at [[Wikipedia talk:Sockpuppet investigations/Chosmawali|SPI]]...

I'm wondering if this is a single spammer, a spambot or a spamfarm – if it is, then it might be possible to nip this in the bud via blocks or an edit filter; however, it might just be somewhere offering advice on how to slip a link into the 'pedia without it being noticed and/or making it difficult to justify just hitting 'undo'. 

The edits – [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=British_Compressed_Air_Society&diff=prev&oldid=1239094529] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=M86_Swimming_Center&diff=prev&oldid=1239096337] – are interesting and identical: making non-destructive, useless, or cosmetic changes (capitalisation, spacing, image placement), sticking in a barely necessary {{tl|cn}}, moving a category from one place to another, and then overwriting a previous spam link with a new one barely related to the subject.

It feels like a bot, but a clever one, which then points to it not being a bot at all. Tricky! I'd be interested in what others might think. [[Special:Contributions/81.187.192.168|81.187.192.168]] ([[User talk:81.187.192.168|talk]]) 10:39, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

:Thanks for this note, and especially for de-spamming those two articles.   (It can't be too clever, because it put a spammy link for a service provider in Florida on an article about a place in Spain.)
:I'd be curious what the anti-spam folks think of this.  @[[User:Beetstra|Beetstra]], [[User:MER-C|MER-C]], [[User:LaundryPizza03|LaundryPizza03]], any thoughts on how to detect this? [[User:WhatamIdoing|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing|talk]]) 18:08, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

*{{spamlink|poolremovalorlando.com}}
*{{spamlink|fittingdeals.com}}
*{{spamlink|agencja-celna.co.uk}}

Found one more account.
*{{UserSummary|Dutsono}}

The normal spam feeds should pick this up. Whether someone reverts it is a different matter. 

See also [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Chosmawali]]. [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 18:33, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

:Thanks for the extra work on this, folks. I brought this up because the modus operandi looked familiar. I've just spent half an hour looking back at my edits from the past couple of days and saw [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=E-Money_Directive&diff=prev&oldid=1238356385 this] by {{user links|Drutohishab}} which is clearly the same bot or sockmaster or whatever. And I'm sure there have been others I've seen in the last few weeks, but finding them would likely be something of a timesink for very little benefit. Is there anywhere to report them if I spot such edits again? Or, since they appear to just make the one spam edit and never do anything again, is it pointless? [[Special:Contributions/81.187.192.168|81.187.192.168]] ([[User talk:81.187.192.168|talk]]) 19:13, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

*{{spamlink|xoompay.com}}
*{{UserSummary|Eshohor}}
*{{UserSummary|Eidakihesa}}

They'll spam the sites enough, then they are ripe for blacklisting. That is probably the best way to deal with this. [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 14:26, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

:Except nobody has updated the blacklist since May, and requests get sent into archives after 1 week (I just changed it to 90 days). That particular system is not working for lack of maintenance.  -- [[User:GreenC|<span style="color: #006A4E;">'''Green'''</span>]][[User talk:GreenC|<span style="color: #093;">'''C'''</span>]] 16:46, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
:I have little experience with spam links, but I think the increased delay in archival will increase the likelihood that an admin will respond. I think a spam-blacklist open request task should also be listed in [[WP:AN]]'s header. –[[User:LaundryPizza03|<b style="color:#77b">Laundry</b><b style="color:#fb0">Pizza</b><b style="color:#b00">03</b>]] ([[User talk:LaundryPizza03|<span style="color:#0d0">d</span>]][[Special:Contribs/LaundryPizza03|<span style="color:#0bf">c̄</span>]]) 20:14, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
::@[[User:GreenC|GreenC]], @[[User:LaundryPizza03|LaundryPizza03]], @[[User:MER-C|MER-C]], it's been about six weeks with the newer 90-day archive rate.  Are spam reports getting handled, or do we need to find some new volunteers?  [[User:WhatamIdoing|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing|talk]]) 06:23, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
:::You can see [[MediaWiki_talk:Spam-blacklist]] activity is happening mostly OnNoitsJamie. -- [[User:GreenC|<span style="color: #006A4E;">'''Green'''</span>]][[User talk:GreenC|<span style="color: #093;">'''C'''</span>]] 13:58, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
:::: What do you mean "nobody has updated the blacklist since May?" There are some months with only a few edits, but we've been [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist&action=history actively updating it] in recent months. BTW, thank you, GreenC, for changing the archival interval; 1 week was definitely too short.  Note that in the "Instructions for Admins" section of  we've been [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki_talk:Spam-blacklist#Migration_to_Special:BlockedExternalDomains encouraged] to use [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist&action=history this list] instead, which I'm happy to do for simple additions of one or two sites.  For requests with a lot of sites (e.g., spam rings), I'll likely continue using Beetra's automation tools that allow for adding a batch of links in 3 clicks. Hopefully we'll eventually have some tooling for the new lists which makes it easier to add batches of sites.  <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<span style="color: #D47C14;">itsJamie</span>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 01:16, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

== Add a blog from a verified institution to a Wikipedia page ==

I would like to add this naver blog which is verifiably owned by a private University in South Korea as it is the only direct source to update the Wikipedia page for Hwang Hyunjin of pertinent information needed for a wiki page. Is this okay?

[https://m.blog.naver.com/gcu2010/221618013170 Global Cyber University] [[User:Fanmadehenecia|Fanmadehenecia]] ([[User talk:Fanmadehenecia|talk]]) 08:08, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

:@[[User:Fanmadehenecia|Fanmadehenecia]] Your link sends me to this page: https://www.kocis.go.kr/koccIntro.do which afaict doesn't mention  [[Hwang Hyun-jin]], so it's hard for me to have an informed opinion (and last time I looked, google translate didn't do Korean very well). However, [[WP:BLPSPS]] likely applies, at least if you mean you want to use the blog ''as a source''. [[User:Gråbergs Gråa Sång|Gråbergs Gråa Sång]] ([[User talk:Gråbergs Gråa Sång|talk]]) 09:22, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
::The link has been corrected and that does say that if the blog is by a reputable institution it can be referenced. The blog post was made by the verified blog profile of the university [[User:Fanmadehenecia|Fanmadehenecia]] ([[User talk:Fanmadehenecia|talk]]) 11:07, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
:::@[[User:Fanmadehenecia|Fanmadehenecia]], you are on the wrong page.  You need to ask this question at [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard]].
:::This page is for questions like "Can I put https://www.kocis.go.kr/koccIntro.do in the ==External links== section of [[Hwang Hyun-jin]]?"  
:::[[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard]] is for questions like "Can I use this blog post to write a paragraph about Hwang Hyun-jin being a [[goodwill ambassador]] for Korea in the article?" [[User:WhatamIdoing|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing|talk]]) 17:30, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

== Elton John videography ==

I would like some feedback on the way external links are being used in [[:Elton John videography]]. Several links were recently removed for COPYLINK and YOUTUBE reasons. The ones that remain are to official websites, etc., but I'm wondering whether they're still OK per [[:WP:EL]]. -- [[User:Marchjuly|Marchjuly]] ([[User talk:Marchjuly|talk]]) 07:14, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

:@[[User:Marchjuly|Marchjuly]], there is no ==External links== section in that article.  [[User:WhatamIdoing|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing|talk]]) 18:17, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
::They're being put into all the tables in the last column. This is normally against [[WP:EL]] unless the external links are the purpose for the tables, which this could be argued as the case here. [[User:Canterbury Tail|<b style="color: Blue;">Canterbury Tail</b>]] [[User talk:Canterbury Tail|<i style="color: Blue;">talk</i>]] 19:47, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
::My apologies if my OP was confusing. The links are, as Canterbury Tail, pointed out being used in the tables of the article. -- [[User:Marchjuly|Marchjuly]] ([[User talk:Marchjuly|talk]]) 21:24, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
:::They're not banned per [[Wikipedia:External links#Links in lists]], but if you don't think it's a good idea for any sort of common-sense reason (e.g., you believe that the links don't help or won't be interesting to readers), then you can dispute their inclusion anyway.   [[User:WhatamIdoing|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing|talk]]) 19:46, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

== Computational chemistry ==

@[[User:Ldm1954|Ldm1954]] and I are having a discussion [[Talk:Computational_chemistry#WP:EL|here]] on whether the external links on [[Computational chemistry]], specifically under the section [[Computational_chemistry#Specialized_journals_on_computational_chemistry|Specialized journals on computational chemistry]] and the link to WebMO at the top, are allowed under [[WP:EL]]. We would love to have more input. [[User:Dajasj|Dajasj]] ([[User talk:Dajasj|talk]]) 15:40, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

:As a comment, I am cross-posting to both [[WT:Chemistry]] and [[WT:Physics]] since I believe matters since the context of both the journals and the link (which provides source credit) matters. [[User:Ldm1954|Ldm1954]] ([[User talk:Ldm1954|talk]]) 15:48, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
::@[[User:Ldm1954|Ldm1954]], while this could be argued as a type of [[Wikipedia:Further reading]], it would be better to create articles or lists for the journals.  The folks at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Academic Journals]] might have some advice for you about how to go about that. [[User:WhatamIdoing|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing|talk]]) 19:48, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
:::For reference, I did not write that list or that article, I only advised the student editor who was left adrift by others (a different issue). I was just disagreeing with deletion of the links to relevant journals where further information on the topic of the article could be found, without first looking for any sort of concensus or (from what I could see) checking whether they were [[WP:RS]]. I do think that a problem with the [[External Links Remover]], like other codes, is that they are black-box and don't understand context. [[User:Ldm1954|Ldm1954]] ([[User talk:Ldm1954|talk]]) 19:59, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
::::I agree that mindlessly removing all links is a problem.  In particular, that will sometimes remove sources added by new people (who don't know how to format them correctly).  If you're going to use something like that, you really have to pay attention to it. [[User:WhatamIdoing|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing|talk]]) 20:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
:::::To clarify, I don't use this tool mindlessly. I have a list of articles that potentially violate [[WP:EL]]. In many cases I don't remove anything. I always check the page before using the tool. And afterwards I check whether I did what I expected it to do. Sometimes this leads me to reverting my edit, because the tool is not perfect (although not a black box). When it appears to be a badly formatted source, I turn it into a reference. With or without the tool, I would have removed the external links on that page (and start a discussion if it is reverted, [[WP:BRD]]). I think it is unnecessary to call the edit or my editting mindless. [[User:Dajasj|Dajasj]] ([[User talk:Dajasj|talk]]) 07:06, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
::::::I don't intend to say that your editing is mindless, especially in this instance, though I can see why you might feel that I had implied that.  It's just that one must be careful (as you have explained in detail) and not trust a tool like this too much.
::::::In the particular instance, [[WP:ELBURDEN]] says that when a link is removed, it should stay out unless and until there is an agreement to restore it.  I still think the best approach here is to write articles (or lists) for each of the journals. [[User:WhatamIdoing|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing|talk]]) 18:45, 21 November 2024 (UTC)