Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Jump to content

Zassenhaus lemma: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Adding short description: "Technical lemme in group theory" (Shortdesc helper)
Changing short description from "Technical lemme in group theory" to "Technical lemma in group theory" (Shortdesc helper)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Technical lemme in group theory}}
{{short description|Technical lemma in group theory}}
[[Image:Butterfly lemma.svg|thumb|300px|right|[[Hasse diagram]] of the Zassenhaus "butterfly" lemma – smaller subgroups are towards the top of the diagram]]
[[Image:Butterfly lemma.svg|thumb|300px|right|[[Hasse diagram]] of the Zassenhaus "butterfly" lemma – smaller subgroups are towards the top of the diagram]]



Revision as of 09:24, 19 April 2020

Hasse diagram of the Zassenhaus "butterfly" lemma – smaller subgroups are towards the top of the diagram

In mathematics, the butterfly lemma or Zassenhaus lemma, named after Hans Zassenhaus, is a technical result on the lattice of subgroups of a group or the lattice of submodules of a module, or more generally for any modular lattice.[1]

Lemma: Suppose is a group with subgroups and . Suppose

and

are normal subgroups. Then there is an isomorphism of quotient groups:

This can be generalized to the case of a group with operators with stable subgroups and , the above statement being the case of acting on itself by conjugation.

Zassenhaus proved this lemma specifically to give the most direct proof of the Schreier refinement theorem. The 'butterfly' becomes apparent when trying to draw the Hasse diagram of the various groups involved.

Zassenhaus' lemma for groups can be derived from a more general result known as Goursat's theorem stated in a Goursat variety (of which groups are an instance); however the group-specific modular law also needs to be used in the derivation.[2]

References

  1. ^ Pierce, R.S. (1982). Associative algebras. Springer. p. 27, exercise 1. ISBN 0-387-90693-2.
  2. ^ J. Lambek (1996). "The Butterfly and the Serpent". In Aldo Ursini; Paulo Agliano (eds.). Logic and Algebra. CRC Press. pp. 161–180. ISBN 978-0-8247-9606-8.

Resources