Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Jump to content

Cephalopelvic disproportion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Cephalopelvic disproportion
SpecialtyObstetrics

Cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD) exists when the capacity of the pelvis is inadequate to allow the fetus to negotiate the birth canal. This may be due to a small pelvis, a nongynecoid pelvic formation, a large fetus, an unfavorable orientation of the fetus, or a combination of these factors. Certain medical conditions may distort pelvic bones, such as rickets or a pelvic fracture, and lead to CPD.

Transverse diagonal measurement has been proposed as a predictive method.[1]

Signs and symptoms

[edit]

1. Prolonged Labor: Labor that doesn’t progress as expected, particularly during the active phase.

2. Failure to Progress: Lack of dilation or descent of the baby despite strong contractions.

3. Severe Pain: Intense pain that is disproportionate to normal labor pain.

4. Fetal Distress: Signs like abnormal heart rate patterns detected via fetal monitoring.

5. Maternal Exhaustion: Extreme fatigue in the mother due to prolonged labor.

6. High Station: The baby’s head remains high in the pelvis and doesn’t descend despite strong contractions.

Diagnosis of CPD usually occurs during labor, often requiring medical interventions such as a cesarean section (C-section) to ensure the safety of both mother and baby.

Causes

[edit]

A large fetus can be one cause of CPD. A large fetus can be caused by gestational diabetes, postterm pregnancy, genetic factors, and multiparity.[citation needed]

The shape of the pelvis can also be a cause of CPD. The pelvis may be too small, or the shape of the pelvis may be malformed.[2] Shorter women are more likely to have CPD[1] as are adolescents.[3]

Diagnosis

[edit]

Diagnosis of CPD may be made when there is failure to progress, but not all cases of prolonged labour are the result of CPD. Use of ultrasound to measure the size of the fetus in the womb is controversial, as these methods are often inaccurate and may lead to unnecessary caesarian section; a trial of labour is often recommended even if size of the fetus is estimated to be large.[2]

Theoretically, pelvimetry may identify cephalo-pelvic disproportion. However, a woman's pelvis loosens up before birth (with the help of hormones). A Cochrane review in 2017 found that there was too little evidence to show whether pelvimetry is beneficial and safe when the baby is in cephalic presentation.[4] A review in 2003 came to the conclusion that pelvimetry does not change the management of pregnant women, and recommended that all women should be allowed a trial of labor regardless of pelvimetry results.[5] It considered routine performance of pelvimetry to be a waste of time, a potential liability, and an unnecessary discomfort.[5]

Treatment

[edit]

In the case of a fetus being too large, some obstetricians recommend induction of labour for earlier delivery. Diagnosis of CPD in active labour will usually result in a Caesarian section.[citation needed]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Liselele HB, Boulvain M, Tshibangu KC, Meuris S (August 2000). "Maternal height and external pelvimetry to predict cephalopelvic disproportion in nulliparous African women: a cohort study". BJOG. 107 (8): 947–52. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb10394.x. PMID 10955423.
  2. ^ a b "Cephalopelvic Disproportion (CPD): Causes and Diagnosis". American Pregnancy Association. 26 April 2012. Retrieved 2016-03-22.
  3. ^ McKenry, Patrick C.; Walters, Lynda Henley; Johnson, Carolyn (1979-01-01). "Adolescent Pregnancy: A Review of the Literature". The Family Coordinator. 28 (1): 17–28. doi:10.2307/583263. JSTOR 583263.
  4. ^ Pattinson R, Cuthbert A, Vannevel V (2017-03-30). "Pelvimetry for fetal cephalic presentations at or near term for deciding on mode of delivery". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 3 (12): CD000161. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000161.pub2. PMC 6464150. PMID 28358979.
  5. ^ a b Blackadar CS, Viera AJ (2004). "A retrospective review of performance and utility of routine clinical pelvimetry". Fam Med. 36 (7): 505–7. PMID 15243832.
[edit]