Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Jump to content

Monster-in-Law

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Monster-in-Law
A wedding cake with figurines of the bride and groom. A finger pushes the bride into the cake.
Theatrical release poster
Directed byRobert Luketic
Written byAnya Kochoff
Produced by
Starring
CinematographyRussell Carpenter
Edited by
  • Scott Hill
  • Kevin Tent
Music byDavid Newman
Production
companies
Distributed by
Release dates
  • May 5, 2005 (2005-05-05) (Atlanta)
  • May 13, 2005 (2005-05-13) (United States)
  • May 26, 2005 (2005-05-26) (Germany)
Running time
101 minutes
Countries
LanguageEnglish
Budget$43 million[2]
Box office$154.7 million[2]

Monster-in-Law is a 2005 romantic comedy film directed by Robert Luketic, written by Anya Kochoff and starring Jennifer Lopez, Jane Fonda, Michael Vartan and Wanda Sykes. It marked a return to cinema for Fonda, being her first film in 15 years since Stanley & Iris in 1990. The film was negatively received by critics who praised Fonda's performance but panned the screenplay, and Lopez's performance. Monster-in-Law was a box office success, grossing $154 million on a $43 million budget.

Plot

[edit]

Charlie Cantilini is a temp/dog walker/yoga instructor and aspiring fashion designer from Venice Beach, California, who meets doctor Kevin Fields. At first, she believes he is gay because of a lie his vindictive ex-girlfriend Fiona told her, but Kevin later asks her out and she feels she has finally found the right man.

Things start to sour when Kevin introduces Charlie to his mother Viola; a former newscaster-turned-talk show host. She was recently replaced by someone much younger, leading to her having a meltdown, attacking a young guest on-air, and being committed for a number of months.

Loathing Charlie immediately due to her being a temp and “going to destroy him”; Viola becomes more distraught when Kevin proposes to her. She fears that she will lose her son just as she lost her career. Determined to ruin Kevin and Charlie's relationship, she enlists the help of her loyal assistant Ruby with assistance from Fiona.

At the engagement party Fiona kisses Kevin in his dressing room, deeply hurting Charlie who feels out of place in Kevin’s world, exactly as Viola and Fiona planned. Viola feigns an anxiety attack and moves in with Charlie while Kevin is away for a medical conference, hoping to drive her crazy with her antics.

Charlie soon catches onto Viola's plan and retaliates by destroying her bedroom and tampering with her anti-psychotic medication (which Viola had replaced with vitamin C tablets). Charlie eventually confronts her, forcing her to move out.

Finding no way to stop the wedding, Viola tricks Charlie into eating nuts during the rehearsal dinner, causing an extreme allergic reaction, resulting in Charlie's face swelling up. Luckily, it subsides by morning.

On the day of the wedding, Viola turns up wearing an extravagant white dress instead of the peach-colored one Charlie had specially made for her. This leads to a violent standoff between them, with Viola refusing to accept Charlie and declaring she will never be good enough for Kevin.

Suddenly, Viola's own dreadful mother-in-law, Kevin's grandmother Gertrude; arrives and they have an indignant argument. Gertrude holds Viola responsible for the death of her son, Kevin's father, many years earlier, claiming he died of "terminal disappointment."

Gertrude's resentment of Viola bears a strong resemblance to Viola's animosity towards Charlie; who decides to back down as she feels the same thing will happen to them in 30 years.

Charlie leaves to tell Kevin the wedding is off but before she can, Ruby finally gets through to Viola. She resents being compared to Gertrude, but Ruby points out that Viola is actually far worse as Gertrude never tried to poison her referring to the nuts at the rehearsal dinner.

Gertude also wore black to Viola's wedding due to being "in mourning" for her son, an equally disrespectful mirror of Viola's own behavior. When Viola claims that she just wants her son to be happy, Ruby asks her what made her think he wasn’t.

Viola has an epiphany and ultimately realizes that she wants Charlie to stay and tells her that she will leave the couple alone if that means her son is happy. Charlie, however, tells Viola that she wants her to be a part of their lives, and they set some boundaries and ground rules.

Charlie and Kevin get married and, when she throws the bouquet, Viola (now wearing the peach-colored dress) catches it. As the newlyweds drive away to their honeymoon in Hawaii, Viola and Ruby leave to go out drinking.

Cast

[edit]

Reception

[edit]

As of August 2021, the film holds an 18% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes, based on 169 reviews with an average rating of 4.28/10. The website's critical consensus reads, "While Jane Fonda steals the movie in her return to the screen, a tired script and flimsy performances make this borderline comedy fall flat."[3] On Metacritic the film has a weighted average score of 31 out of 100, based on reviews from 38 critics, indicating "generally unfavorable reviews".[4] Audiences polled by CinemaScore gave the film an average grade of "B+" on an A+ to F scale.[5]

Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times gave the film one out of possible four stars, saying: "You do not keep Jane Fonda offscreen for 15 years, only to bring her back as a specimen of rabid Momism. You write a role for her. It makes sense. It fits her. You like her in it. It gives her a relationship with Jennifer Lopez that could plausibly exist in our time and space. It gives her a son who has not wandered over after the E.R. auditions. And it doesn't supply a supporting character who undercuts every scene she's in by being more on-topic than any of the leads."[6] Joe Morgenstern of the Wall Street Journal also panned the movie, and used his review to deride the state of big-budget film-making, writing: "Films like this ... are emblematic of Hollywood's relentless dumbing-down and defining-down of big-screen attractions. There's an audience for such stuff, but little enthusiasm or loyalty. Adult moviegoers are being ignored almost completely during all but the last two or three months of each year, while even the kids who march off to the multiplexes each weekend know they're getting moldy servings of same-old, rather than entertainments that feed their appetite for surprise and delight."[7] Mick LaSalle of the San Francisco Chronicle was one of the few critics who gave the film a positive review, writing: "It's a crude, obvious comedy, which occasionally clunks, but it's often very funny, as well as being a really shrewd bit of popular entertainment. Its appeal resides in a lot of things, not the least of which is a sophisticated awareness of what an audience brings to it."[8]

Box office

[edit]

The film ran 849 sneak preview screenings on Mother's Day at 4pm, the Sunday before release. New Line's president of domestic distribution David Tuckerman publicly stated his doubts about this strategy but the film achieved 90% attendance and he stated "the marketing department hit a home run."[9] The film became a box-office success debuting at number #1 at the box office during its first weekend and earning $24 million. By the end of its run, the movie earned $83 million at the domestic box office and a worldwide total of $154.7 million, against an estimated production budget of $43 million.[2]

Accolades

[edit]

Lopez earned a Golden Raspberry Award nomination for Worst Actress for her performance in the film, but lost to Jenny McCarthy for Dirty Love.

Television series

[edit]

On October 13, 2014, it was reported that Fox was developing a television series based on the film with Amy B. Harris as creator.[10] In 2021, E! reported that the series "didn't ultimately happen".[11]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b "Monster-in-Law (2005)" (select "Details" tab). American Film Institute. Retrieved September 9, 2018.
  2. ^ a b c "Monster-in-Law (2005)". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved September 5, 2019.
  3. ^ "Monster-in-Law (2005)". Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved 15 June 2020.
  4. ^ "Monster-in-Law Reviews". Metacritic. Retrieved May 20, 2018.
  5. ^ "Cinemascore". Archived from the original on 2018-12-20. Retrieved 2019-09-05.
  6. ^ Ebert, Roger (2005-05-12). "Monster-in-Law". Chicago Sun-Times. Retrieved 2017-10-27.
  7. ^ Morgenstern, Joe (2005-05-13). "Monster-in-Law". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 2019-04-26.
  8. ^ LaSalle, Mick. "Honey, meet my mother. Now please try not to kill each other". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 2017-10-27.
  9. ^ Brandon Gray (May 16, 2005). "'Monster-in-Law' Claws to the Top". Box Office Mojo.
  10. ^ Andreeva, Nellie (14 October 2014). "'Monster-In-Law' Comedy Series Based On Movie In Works At Fox". Deadline Hollywood. Retrieved 3 December 2015.
  11. ^ "The Truth About Those Slaps: 15 Secrets From Monster-In-Law - E! Online". www.eonline.com. Retrieved 2021-07-11.
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Monster-in-Law&oldid=1258091754"