User contributions for Geogene
Appearance
Results for Geogene talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 10,528 edits. Account created on 3 June 2009.
22 November 2024
- 05:1605:16, 22 November 2024 diff hist −1,526 Cat predation on wildlife →Veterinarian perspectives: On second thought, the article isn't really about feral cat management, so should the "Veterinarian Perspectives" section even be here? AVMA's position statement agrees that outdoor cats are problematic
- 05:1305:13, 22 November 2024 diff hist −1 m Cat predation on wildlife →Cat owner perspective: ce, "it's" is a contraction for "it is", not a possessive pronoun
- 05:0805:08, 22 November 2024 diff hist +615 Cat predation on wildlife →Veterinarian perspectives: The AVMA does not unconditionally endorse TNR, replace text that says they do with a lengthy quote from their position statement
- 04:5804:58, 22 November 2024 diff hist −1,980 Cat predation on wildlife →Targeted feeding bans on cats: deleting pro-TNR content sourced to advocacy group's self-published sources
- 01:5401:54, 22 November 2024 diff hist +1 Cat predation on wildlife Some content in this article was copy-pasted from the Trap-neuter-return article; see that article's edit history for attribution (null edit)
21 November 2024
- 15:5115:51, 21 November 2024 diff hist −10,462 Cat predation on wildlife Reverting back to Red-tailed hawk 04:58, 17 November 2024 by Red-tailed hawk. Quality issues, POV, primary sources, lack of talk page discussion for large changes
7 November 2024
- 01:2601:26, 7 November 2024 diff hist −303 Peanut (squirrel) →Death: Delete BLP vio. Do not make statements about low-profile individuals sourced to Twitter.
3 November 2024
- 19:1019:10, 3 November 2024 diff hist +247 Burckle Crater Undid revision 1255192058 by GlacialHorizon (talk). that's from a reliable source, one of the few RS's that discuss the topic in any depth current Tag: Undo
30 October 2024
- 23:5623:56, 30 October 2024 diff hist −11 Bachman's warbler Undid revision 1254423917 by Jguti1238 (talk) Tag: Undo
29 October 2024
- 19:4719:47, 29 October 2024 diff hist −1,179 Cat predation on wildlife →Birds: mesopredator release effect is already covered under island ecosystems Tag: Reverted
26 October 2024
- 14:3214:32, 26 October 2024 diff hist +103 User talk:Geogene →Tucson artifacts: Reply Tags: Reverted Reply
25 October 2024
- 01:2501:25, 25 October 2024 diff hist −13 m Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Use of medical literature for claims about relative incidence of dog attacks by breed: ce
- 01:2301:23, 25 October 2024 diff hist +1,321 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Use of medical literature for claims about relative incidence of dog attacks by breed: Reply Tag: Reply
24 October 2024
- 22:5222:52, 24 October 2024 diff hist +149 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Use of medical literature for claims about relative incidence of dog attacks by breed: Reply Tag: Reply
- 22:1622:16, 24 October 2024 diff hist +295 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Use of medical literature for claims about relative incidence of dog attacks by breed: Reply Atsme, please explain the problem in my diff Tag: Reply
- 19:4119:41, 24 October 2024 diff hist +667 User talk:Geogene →Tucson artifacts: Reply Tags: Reverted Reply
- 17:4517:45, 24 October 2024 diff hist −297 Tucson artifacts Undid revision 1253068980 by 2601:341:8100:7F10:9107:56DA:F755:86E6 (talk) Not completely certain I understand what's being argued here, but it looks like a PROFRINGE claim sourced to America Unearthed Tags: Undo Reverted
- 16:1016:10, 24 October 2024 diff hist +523 User talk:Geogene →Pitbulls: Reply Tags: Reverted Reply
- 06:3106:31, 24 October 2024 diff hist +434 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Use of medical literature for claims about relative incidence of dog attacks by breed: Reply Tag: Reply
- 06:0806:08, 24 October 2024 diff hist +1,150 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Use of medical literature for claims about relative incidence of dog attacks by breed: Reply Tag: Reply
- 05:4205:42, 24 October 2024 diff hist +227 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Use of medical literature for claims about relative incidence of dog attacks by breed: Reply Tag: Reply
23 October 2024
- 20:4020:40, 23 October 2024 diff hist +259 Talk:Pit bull →RSNB Thread opened: new section Tag: New topic
- 20:3420:34, 23 October 2024 diff hist +2,147 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Use of medical literature for claims about relative incidence of dog attacks by breed: new section Tag: New topic
- 04:3604:36, 23 October 2024 diff hist +937 Talk:Pit bull →This topic is not as controversial as it is in public opinon.: Reply. that AVMA link acknowledges that pit bulls are the most of commonly implicated in attacks. Tag: Reply
- 01:1601:16, 23 October 2024 diff hist +171 Talk:Pit bull →Khan et al., Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Trauma, 2019: Reply Tag: Reply
- 01:1401:14, 23 October 2024 diff hist +1,214 Talk:Pit bull →Tsokos et al., "Extensive and Mutilating Craniofacial Trauma Involving Defleshing and Decapitation". In American Journal of Forensic Medical Pathology, 2007: new section Tag: New topic
- 01:0501:05, 23 October 2024 diff hist +217 Talk:Pit bull →Khan et al., Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Trauma, 2019: Reply What are you talking about? The Time article is here. [https://time.com/2891180/kfc-and-the-pit-bull-attack-of-a-little-girl/]. Tag: Reply
- 00:5700:57, 23 October 2024 diff hist +238 Talk:Pit bull →This topic is not as controversial as it is in public opinon.: Reply Okay, so you don't have any evidence that there's this imagined veterinary POV that conflicts with the published views in medical journals. Tag: Reply
- 00:2800:28, 23 October 2024 diff hist −92 Talk:Pit bull →Khan et al., Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Trauma, 2019: ah, loodog was talking about the original link in the Time article. Nevertheless it doesn't matter; we don't delete sources just because they're not online
- 00:0000:00, 23 October 2024 diff hist +246 Talk:Pit bull →Khan et al., Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Trauma, 2019: Reply I don't what's wrong with your internet connections, but I have no problem pulling up that source. It's weird that two of you are claiming to have 404 errors. Tag: Reply
22 October 2024
- 23:5923:59, 22 October 2024 diff hist +201 Talk:Pit bull →This topic is not as controversial as it is in public opinon.: Do you have veterinary journals that say that the medical journals are wrong? You haven't presented any. Tag: Reply
- 23:5023:50, 22 October 2024 diff hist +284 Talk:Pit bull →Khan et al., Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Trauma, 2019: Reply Tag: Reply
- 23:4623:46, 22 October 2024 diff hist +197 Talk:Pit bull →This topic is not as controversial as it is in public opinon.: Reply and why would I have to do that? Why don't you take your argument to RSNB? Tag: Reply
- 23:3723:37, 22 October 2024 diff hist −3 Talk:Pit bull →This topic is not as controversial as it is in public opinon.: ce
- 23:3623:36, 22 October 2024 diff hist +420 Talk:Pit bull →This topic is not as controversial as it is in public opinon.: Reply Tag: Reply
- 20:5420:54, 22 October 2024 diff hist +461 Talk:Pit bull →Khan et al., Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Trauma, 2019: Reply, WP:SOURCEACCESS Tag: Reply
- 20:3220:32, 22 October 2024 diff hist +1 m Talk:Pit bull →Khan et al., Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Trauma, 2019: correct the name
- 18:2218:22, 22 October 2024 diff hist +1,689 Talk:Pit bull →Khan et al., Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Trauma, 2019: new section Tag: New topic
- 17:4617:46, 22 October 2024 diff hist +375 Talk:Pit bull →This topic is not as controversial as it is in public opinon.: Reply Tag: Reply
21 October 2024
- 15:0615:06, 21 October 2024 diff hist −303 Cat predation on wildlife Undid revision 1252479738 by Azan alam (talk) Tag: Undo
- 04:0504:05, 21 October 2024 diff hist +247 Talk:Pit bull →Nature Study in Staffordshire Terriers not being aggressive: Reply that's OR Tag: Reply
- 03:5003:50, 21 October 2024 diff hist +262 Talk:Pit bull →Nature Study in Staffordshire Terriers not being aggressive: Reply Nope. Not going to use PRIMARY studies to "debunk" SECONDARY ones Tag: Reply
- 03:2403:24, 21 October 2024 diff hist +450 Talk:Pit bull →Nature Study in Staffordshire Terriers not being aggressive: Reply Tag: Reply
- 02:4102:41, 21 October 2024 diff hist +1,109 Talk:Pit bull →Nature Study in Staffordshire Terriers not being aggressive: Reply Tag: Reply
- 01:5901:59, 21 October 2024 diff hist +936 Talk:Pit bull →Nature Study in Staffordshire Terriers not being aggressive: Reply Tag: Reply
17 October 2024
- 05:0605:06, 17 October 2024 diff hist +468 Talk:Pit bull →This topic is not as controversial as it is in public opinon.: add, example of a negative trait in Clumber spaniels that still persists now, some pits are still being bred for fighting
- 04:3904:39, 17 October 2024 diff hist +256 Talk:Pit bull →This topic is not as controversial as it is in public opinon.: Reply Tag: Reply
14 October 2024
- 18:5118:51, 14 October 2024 diff hist +318 Talk:Pit bull →Nature Study in Staffordshire Terriers not being aggressive: Reply Tag: Reply
- 15:1015:10, 14 October 2024 diff hist +721 Talk:Trap–neuter–return →Addressing NPOV issues, starting with the lead paragraph: Reply Tag: Reply
- 05:2505:25, 14 October 2024 diff hist +427 Talk:Trap–neuter–return →Addressing NPOV issues, starting with the lead paragraph: fix the ordering. I don't know why Nylnoj didn't contest these citations in the order they appear in the article, but it makes it a lot harder for me to format this reply