User contributions for Ian.joyner

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

12:0712:07, 30 November 2024 diff hist +372 Talk:Memory management →Burroughs/Unisys MCP memory management system discussed in Knuth?: Reply current Tag: Reply
11:5611:56, 30 November 2024 diff hist +585 Talk:Burroughs large systems descriptors →Past vs. present tense in for the B5000 series: Reply Tag: Reply
11:5111:51, 30 November 2024 diff hist +738 Talk:Burroughs large systems descriptors →Past vs. present tense in for the B5000 series: Reply Tag: Reply
11:4311:43, 30 November 2024 diff hist +217 User talk:Guy Harris →Burroughs B5000 should be referred to in past tense: Reply current Tag: Reply
11:4011:40, 30 November 2024 diff hist +236 User talk:Guy Harris →Burroughs B5000 should be referred to in past tense: Reply Tag: Reply
11:3611:36, 30 November 2024 diff hist +7 Burroughs large systems descriptors Undid revision 1260347372 by Guy Harris (talk) Guy Harris, stop being so petty. I don't know why you are undoing sensible and correct changes. Tags: Undo Reverted
07:0207:02, 30 November 2024 diff hist +385 User talk:Guy Harris →Burroughs B5000 should be referred to in past tense: Reply Tag: Reply
06:5906:59, 30 November 2024 diff hist +524 User talk:Guy Harris →Burroughs B5000 should be referred to in past tense: Reply Tag: Reply
06:5306:53, 30 November 2024 diff hist +7 Burroughs large systems descriptors Guy Harris. Stop being childish and reversing my legitimate edits because you have some grudge against me. Tags: Undo Reverted
03:5803:58, 30 November 2024 diff hist +339 User talk:Guy Harris →Burroughs B5000 should be referred to in past tense: new section Tag: New topic
03:5503:55, 30 November 2024 diff hist +7 Burroughs large systems descriptors Undid revision 1260315825 by Guy Harris (talk) Past tense is correct. We are talking about events of more than 50 years ago. Tags: Undo Reverted
03:5203:52, 30 November 2024 diff hist +594 Talk:Memory segmentation →Burroughs large system architectures is two distinct lines: Reply Tag: Reply
00:5200:52, 30 November 2024 diff hist +3 m Burroughs large systems descriptors →Integration in memory architecture: Further changes made to past tense for consistency. Tag: Reverted
00:4900:49, 30 November 2024 diff hist +1 m Burroughs large systems descriptors →Integration in memory architecture Tag: Reverted
00:4800:48, 30 November 2024 diff hist +3 m Burroughs large systems descriptors →Integration in memory architecture: Past tense verbs referring to B5000 restored, after unjustified undo by Chatul. The B5000 is in the past. The rest of the article uses past tense. Tag: Reverted
00:1300:13, 30 November 2024 diff hist +285 Talk:Memory segmentation →Burroughs large system architectures is two distinct lines: Reply Tag: Reply
00:0700:07, 30 November 2024 diff hist +232 Talk:The Art of Computer Programming →Why has NYQ changed all headings to lower case?: new section Tag: New topic

09:4709:47, 30 October 2024 diff hist −28 Ian Stephenson (curator) No edit summary
09:4509:45, 30 October 2024 diff hist +38 Ian Stephenson (curator) Saddest change ever for a wonderful school friend.

01:3701:37, 27 October 2024 diff hist +217 Talk:Object (computer science) →Terrible Article: new section Tag: New topic

07:2707:27, 25 October 2024 diff hist +476 Talk:Object-oriented programming →We could write this more simply: Reply Tag: Reply
07:2107:21, 25 October 2024 diff hist +494 Talk:Object-oriented programming →We could write this more simply: Reply Tag: Reply

08:5008:50, 18 October 2024 diff hist +1,037 Talk:NEWP →Machine instructions are generated directly from each source statement?: Reply Tag: Reply

01:4001:40, 17 October 2024 diff hist +1,127 Talk:NEWP →Machine instructions are generated directly from each source statement?: Reply Tag: Reply
01:3701:37, 17 October 2024 diff hist −7 NEWP Clarify wording of generated machine instructions and that paragraph. current

02:2002:20, 16 October 2024 diff hist −423 Memory segmentation Undid revision It is not true that B6000 was a separate or radically different product line from B5000. The architecture was the same but with some enhancements. The implementation technology might have been very different. Chatul might be thinking of the B1000 or B2/3/4000 product lines. Please provide reasoning behind the comments. Tag: Undo