Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Jump to content

Taiwan New Cinema

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Taiwan New Cinema (also known as New Taiwanese Cinema or the Taiwan New Wave) was a film reform movement initiated by young Taiwanese filmmakers and directors which took place from 1982 to 1987. Taiwan New Cinema films primarily showcase a realistic style with their depictions of subject matter close to the social reality, offering a retrospective look into the lives of the common people. Taiwan New Cinema brought about a new chapter for the cinema of Taiwan with its innovative form and unique style.[1][2][3][4]

History

[edit]

Before Taiwan New Cinema

[edit]

Political propaganda (1945–1960)

[edit]

On August 15, 1945, Taiwan was liberated from Japanese rule after Japan unconditionally surrendered. The Republic of China's Nationalist government took over Taiwan and abolished the Japanization implemented by the Japanese rule, including the Japanization of spoken languages in Taiwan. The Nationalist government started the promotion of Mandarin. In 1949, the Chinese Civil War between the Nationalist Party (Kuomintang) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) ended with the CCP taking control of mainland China, while the Nationalist Kuomintang Party retreated to Taiwan.[5][6]

In the 1950s, to comply with the government's political agenda, the three major state-owned film studios (Taiwan Film Culture Co., the China Motion Picture Studio, and the Agricultural Education Film Studio) underwent structural reform. Subsequently, through the restrictions imposed by censorship and ideological regulation, the government fully managed and controlled the film industry.[7] During this period, Taiwanese films largely aligned with the anti-communist and anti-Soviet political ideology and became tools for political propaganda, resulting in mediocre content.[8] Under the special circumstances of the Chinese Civil War and the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union, Taiwanese audiences, amidst a gloomy situation, found resonance in local film culture, leading to the rise of Taiyupian (Taiwanese-language cinema).[9][10][11]

Innovative productions (1960–1978)

[edit]

In the 1960s, the situation across the Taiwan Strait gradually stabilized, and the overall social atmosphere became slightly more relaxed. With the U.S. military presence in Taiwan, Taiwan began to experience stable development. In March 1963, Kung Hong, the newly appointed president at the Central Motion Picture Corporation, proposed a film production style called healthy realism that, while adopting the filmmaking style of realistic films in Europe and the United States, avoided exposing the dark side of society.[12][13] Surprisingly, the approach of concealing the bad while promoting the good and of advocating humanitarianism were well-received in the Taiwanese market.[14] This innovation not only elevated the production standards of Taiwanese films but also opened up the overseas Chinese market for films.[15][16]

In addition, many films adapted from the novels of Taiwanese writer Chiung Yao introduced extensively emerging thematic elements of romance and melancholy, and hence expanded the horizons of Taiwanese cinema. During this period, Mandarin-language films flourished, overshadowing and gradually leading to the decline of the Taiyupian market.[17][18]

In the 1970s, under the leadership of Chiang Ching-kuo, who was serving as the Premier of the Executive Yuan at the time, Taiwan embarked on the Ten Major Construction Projects to accelerate economic development. As a result, Taiwanese society transitioned from an agrarian society to an industrial one, and the majority of Taiwanese people became more affluent. Films at the time started responding to societal demands with the production of patriotic films, romance films, martial arts films, kung fu films, and comedy films, all of which became the mainstream media providing entertainment for the public.[19][20]

However, these films eventually faced rejection from audiences due to their repetitive nature and adherence to established conventions. The influx of American and Hong Kong films into the Taiwanese market further exacerbated the decline of Taiwanese cinema.[21]

Cinematic reform (1978–1982)

[edit]

In June 1978, Ming Ji, the president of Central Motion Picture Corporation, revisited film production trends and guidelines and set goals to "strengthen policy propaganda and promote cooperation with both domestic and overseas filmmakers."[22] In 1980, the Government Information Office of the Executive Yuan put in efforts to enhance the artistic and international dimensions of Taiwanese films. The Central Motion Picture Corporation was tasked with initiating a series of reforms, such as personnel reorganization. Hsiao Yeh was appointed as the Deputy Manager of the Production Planning Department and the Head of the Planning Team, and Wu Nien-jen, an emerging writer at the time, was hired for screenwriting.[23][24]

Since then, Taiwanese cinema broke free from its previous creative style, with plots that are more closely related to the realities of society. Establishing new forms of cinematic style and language, it also began to cast non-celebrity or non-professional actors and to adopt a more natural and realistic filmmaking approach.[25][26][27]

Taiwan New Cinema (1982–1987)

[edit]

In 1982, three new-generation directors—Edward Yang, Ko I-chen, and Chang Yi—joined the Central Motion Picture Corporation and proposed a collaborative project of low-budget films.[28] Through the efforts of Ming Ji and Hsiao Yeh, they produced the four-segment anthology film, In Our Time.[29] This film marked the beginning of analyzing real social phenomena and caring about the realities of everyday life as well as the restoration of collective memory.[30][31] For this reason, In Our Time has been widely regarded as the first work of the Taiwan New Cinema movement. All the filmmakers involved in this film became important members of the movement. The naturalistic and literary style of In Our Time symbolized the difference between New Cinema and Old Cinema.[32]

Subsequently, emerging Taiwanese directors, such as Chen Kun-hou, Hou Hsiao-Hsien, Wan Jen, and Wang Toon, began producing realistic works that resonated with the cinematic movement, sparking a trend of realistic filmmaking.[33] At the time, art films that emphasized the seriousness and scholarly significance of cinema had also gradually made their way into Taiwan, even though the ideas that came with these art films might not necessarily coincide with the notion of audience-oriented film promoted by the Film Critics China.[34]

In 1983, the three-segment anthology film The Sandwich Man, directed by the new-generation directors, sparked a wave of criticism due to an attempt to censor depictions of poverty, known as the "Apple-Paring Incident", that happened prior to the film's release.[35] This event was widely seen as an ideological struggle between the New Cinema and the Old Cinema, as well as between the new-generation directors and the Film Critics China. The former brought the controversy into the public sphere to seek arbitration, while the latter used anonymous letters to make accusations and express doubts. Ultimately, as the film managed to escape censorship and kept its creative concept intact, The Sandwich Man established the theme and direction for the Taiwan New Cinema.[36][37]

However, due to the immaturity of a few incompetent individuals, some films exhibited excessive self-indulgent sentimentality. As a result, the quality of New Cinema varied, and it gradually lost its appeal at the box office.[38] The New Cinema films focused on art cinema, while Hong Kong and Hollywood films prioritized commercial productions, leading to a growing divide between the critics and supporters of each side.[39][40] Supporters expressed their unwillingness to stifle the progress of New Cinema, while critics engaged in forceful criticism of the movement. After numerous debates, the new-generation directors became increasingly dissatisfied with the Film Critics China.[41][42] However, despite facing severe criticism and poor box office performance in the Taiwanese market at the time, New Cinema, receiving numerous awards, gained international recognition at international film festivals and in the global art cinema circuit.[43][44]

On November 6, 1986, Edward Yang delivered a speech entitled the "Taiwan Film Manifesto of the 76th Year of the Republic of China" at his 40th birthday party in his home in Taipei. In the speech, also known as "Another Cinema Manifesto," he strongly questioned the film policies as well as the mass media and film criticism system of that time. Yang's provocative statement was seen as proclaiming the death of the New Cinema movement.[45] On January 24, 1987, the manifesto was published in the Literary Supplement of the China Times, as well as in Wenxing Monthly and the Hong Kong magazine Film Biweekly. Generally speaking, the "Taiwan Film Manifesto of the 76th Year of the Republic of China," drafted by fifty New Cinema filmmakers and cultural workers, can be seen as the end of the New Cinema movement and the beginning of a pursuit for "Another Cinema" in the subsequent years.[46][47][48][49]

On July 15, 1987, the Nationalist government announced the lifting of the 38-year-long martial law and allowed its people to visit their families in the mainland, leading to a gradual easing of political relations between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait. Additionally, with the rise of the Tangwai movement, Taiwanese society gradually freed itself from oppression. In conjunction with the lifting of governmental restrictions on political party formation and press freedom, the overall atmosphere in society was no longer as serious as before.[50][51]

Repercussions (1988–1996)

[edit]

After the lifting of martial law, despite Taiwanese cinema's continuous struggle in the market, directors and screenwriters who emerged from the New Cinema movement had already begun to delve into previously taboo subjects, revisiting and exploring Taiwan's modern history and personal memories.[52][53][54]

In 1989, Hou Hsiao-Hsien, a participant in the New Cinema movement, achieved international recognition with his film, A City of Sadness, winning the prestigious Golden Lion Award at the Venice Film Festival.[55] This marked the first time a Taiwanese film had received recognition at one of the world's top three film festivals.[56] The film depicts the prominent Lin family in the Jiufen area as they navigate through the periods of the Japanese rule, the end of World War II, the 228 Incident, and the White Terror, providing a nuanced reflection of Taiwan's modern history and garnering much praise.[57] From then on, Taiwanese cinema achieved full artistic freedom in its choice of subjects and officially entered an era of diversity, free from ideological constraints.[58][59]

Contributions of Taiwan New Cinema

[edit]

The meaning of Taiwan New Cinema

[edit]

In 1998, the first Taipei Film Festival was officially organized by the Taipei Film Festival Executive Committee. Under the auspices of the organizing committee, the book Revisiting the Past: Tracing the Origins of Taiwanese Cinema (Chen Kuo-fu, 1998) was published. The book positioned the provenience of Taiwanese cinema with the film, The Sandwich Man, which marked the beginning of the Taiwan New Cinema movement. It argued that, prior to The Sandwich Man, no film had ever been referred to as Taiwanese cinema.[60] The films before the Taiwan New Cinema movement were often understood as "an escapism from facing reality," embodying "the inner conflicts of people during the tense political atmosphere and social transition period across the Taiwan Strait." At that time, domestic films were often labeled with the stigma of escapism.[61]

The entire book focused on the retrospective of The Sandwich Man, considering it as the starting point of the Taiwan New Cinema and even of Taiwanese cinema as a whole. It adopted a historical perspective centering on the New Cinema movement in its historiography of the film history of Taiwan.[62] It extensively discussed and strongly criticized the Film Critics China that caused the Apple-Paring Incident at that time.[63] Additionally, New Cinema director Wan Jen believed that the incident of his receiving anonymous blackmail was "a complete confrontation between the old and new forces".[64]

Style of Taiwan New Cinema

[edit]
  • Close examination of the lives of Taiwanese people: It conveys introspection towards the living environment by providing memories distinct from the one-Chinese narrative, extensively using local Taiwanese literary writings, and consolidating a collective identity shared by the Taiwanese people.[65]
  • Analysis of real social phenomena: It becomes the voice for Taiwan's historical development by focusing on daily life, placing greater emphasis on personal experiences and memories, abandoning the previous approach of highlighting the good and concealing the bad, and analytically dissecting the pains experienced by people in each era.[66][67]
  • Employment of non-celebrity and non-professional actors: Its attention to Taiwan's local culture expresses a breakthrough by departing from the star system and extensively employing non-celebrity or non-professional actors in films to create characters that are closer to ordinary people and their experience.[68]
  • Establishment of a visual aesthetic style: It establishes key cinematic features incorporating both realist and modernist styles by breaking away from the outdated industrial filmmaking and narrative models, and creating a visual style with deep-focus cinematography and long-take aesthetics that is accompanied by concise storytelling methods.[69][70][71]

Influence of Taiwan New Cinema

[edit]
  • Elevating the quality of Taiwanese films: It aligns Taiwanese cinema with world cinema and brings Taiwanese cinema into the top-tier international film festivals by indirectly excluding low-quality works with its emphasis on the concept of film as art.[72][73][74][75][76][77]
  • Breaking through the restrictions of subject matter: By extending the thematic scope to previously taboo topics, exploring controversial events and figures in Taiwan, and examining the changes in the social structure, Taiwan New Cinema achieves creative freedom beyond ideological constraints.[78][79][80][81]

Key films

[edit]
Taiwan New Cinema
Year Film Title Director Note
1982 In Our Time Edward Yang, Ko I-chen, Tao Te-chen, and Chang Yi
Green Green Grass of Home Hou Hsiao-Hsien
1983 Growing Up Chen Kun-Hou
The Sandwich Man Hou Hsiao-Hsien, Tseng Chuang-hsiang, and Wan Jen Apple-Paring Incident[82]
A Flower in The Raining Night Wong Toon
That Day, on the Beach Edward Yang
The Boys from Fengkuei Hou Hsiao-Hsien
Kendo Kids Chang Yi
Kidnapped Ko I-chen
1984 Ah Fei Wan Jen
Second Spring of Mr. Muo You-Ning Lee
Jade Love Chang Yi
A Summer at Grandpa's Hou Hsiao-Hsien
Run Away Wang Toon
Nature Is Quiet Beautiful Tseng Chuang-hsiang
I Love Mary Ko I-chen
1985 Taipei Story Edward Yang
A Time to Live, A Time to Die Hou Hsiao-Hsien
Kuei-Mei, a Woman Chang Yi
Super Citizen Wan Jen
The Loser, the Hero Peter Mak
The Butcher's Wife Tseng Chuang-hsiang
1986 Reunion Ko I-chen
Dust in the Wind Hou Hsiao-Hsien Taiwan Film Manifesto of the 76th Year of the Republic of China[83]
Terrorizers Edward Yang
1987 Farewell to the Channel Wan Jen
Daughter of the Nile Hou Hsiao-Hsien
Osmanthus Alley Chen Kun-Hou
Strawman Wang Toon
1988 The Last Autumn of Lao Ke You-Ning Lee
1989 A City of Sadness Hou Hsiao-Hsien
Banana Paradise Wang Toon
1990 School Girl Chen Kuo-fu
1991 A Brighter Summer Day Edward Yang
1992 Hill of No Return Wang Toon
1993 The Puppetmaster Hou Hsiao-Hsien
Treasure Island Chen Kuo-fu
1994 A Confucian Confusion Edward Yang
A Borrowed Life Wu Nien-jen
1995 The Peony Pavilion Chen Kuo-fu
Good Men, Good Women Hou Hsiao-Hsien
Super Citizen Ko Wan Jen
1996 Mahjong Edward Yang
Goodbye South, Goodbye Hou Hsiao-Hsien
Buddha Bless America Wu Nien-jen
1997 Blue Moon Ko I-chen
1998 Flowers of Shanghai Hou Hsiao-Hsien
The Personals Chen Kuo-fu
Connection by Fate Wan Jen
2000 Yi Yi Edward Yang

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Lin, Mucai. Taiwan New Cinema Revisited I. Film Appreciation Journal, issue 191, 2022.
  2. ^ 陳儒修. 「30年前的台灣新電影，意味著什麼？」 Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. p. 276-279.
  3. ^ Tweedie, James. The Age of New Waves : Art Cinema and the Staging of Globalization. Oxford University Press, 2013.
  4. ^ Yeh, Emilie Yueh-yu, et al. 32 New Takes on Taiwan Cinema. Edited by Emilie Yueh-yu Yeh et al., University of Michigan Press, 2022, doi:10.3998/mpub.11602090.
  5. ^ Wicks, James. Transnational Representations : The State of Taiwan Film in the 1960s And 70s. 1st ed., Hong Kong University Press, 2014.
  6. ^ 李道明，【臺灣與電影的兩種第一次接觸】，《看得見的記憶：二十二部電影裡的百年臺灣電影史》， 春山出版， 2020。
  7. ^ Zhen Wanxiang 鄭玩香. 2001. “Zhanhou Taiwan dianying guanli tixi zhi yanjiu, 1950–1970” 戰後臺灣電影管理體系之研究, 1950–1970 (Studies on the postwar Taiwanese motion picture regulatory system, 1950–1970). Master thesis, Guoli Zhongyang Daxue Lishi Yanjiusuo 國立中央大學歷史研究所 (Graduate Institute of History, National Central University). pp. 21-29.
  8. ^ 葉龍彥，《圖解台灣電影史》，晨星，2017。
  9. ^ 小野. 「那時候大家都只想做我們自己的東西」" Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. p. 206-213.
  10. ^ 陳儒修. 「30年前的台灣新電影，意味著什麼？」 Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. p. 276-279.
  11. ^ Su, Chih-heng. Once Upon a Time in Hollywood Taiwan. Spring Hill, 2020.
  12. ^ Wicks, James. Transnational Representations : The State of Taiwan Film in the 1960s And 70s. 1st ed., Hong Kong University Press, 2014.
  13. ^ 葉龍彥，《圖解台灣電影史》，晨星，2017。
  14. ^ 楊元鈴，【蔡揚名，《錯誤的第一步》，一九七九】，《看得見的記憶：二十二部電影裡的百年臺灣電影史》，春山出版， 2020。
  15. ^ 王建業. 「他們很尊重攝影機前細微、有張力的世界」 Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. p. 232-237.
  16. ^ Tweedie, James. The Age of New Waves : Art Cinema and the Staging of Globalization. Oxford University Press, 2013.
  17. ^ Su, Chih-heng. Once Upon a Time in Hollywood Taiwan. Spring Hill, 2020.
  18. ^ 葉龍彥，《圖解台灣電影史》，晨星，2017。
  19. ^ 王建業. 「他們很尊重攝影機前細微、有張力的世界」 Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. p. 232-237.
  20. ^ 陳儒修. 「30年前的台灣新電影，意味著什麼？」 Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. p. 276-279.
  21. ^ 王建業. 「他們很尊重攝影機前細微、有張力的世界」 Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. p. 232-237.
  22. ^ Lim, Song Hwee. Taiwan Cinema as Soft Power: Authorship, Transnationality, Historiography. Oxford University Press, 2021, doi:10.1093/oso/9780197503379.001.0001.
  23. ^ 小野. 「那時候大家都只想做我們自己的東西」" Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. p. 206-213.
  24. ^ 吳念真. 「過去那種革命情感，是我最懷念的」 Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. p. 246-249.
  25. ^ 小野。「我們的八十年代」， Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. p. 20.
  26. ^ 陳儒修. 「30年前的台灣新電影，意味著什麼？」 Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. p. 276-279.
  27. ^ 陳逸達，【每個時代都需要重寫自己的記憶】，《看得見的記憶：二十二部電影裡的百年臺灣電影史》， 春山出版， 2020。
  28. ^ Ko, I-chen. 「一開始，只覺得如果能拍一部電影，就是很過癮的事情了」。 Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. p. 200-201.
  29. ^ Lee Daw-ming, "Gazging back in Retrospect: A Hundred Year of Taiwan Cinema," 2001. pp. 41-51.
  30. ^ 吳念真. 「過去那種革命情感，是我最懷念的」 Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. p. 246-249.
  31. ^ 張, 靚蓓 (2011). 凝望.時代 : 穿越悲情城市二十年. 田園城市文化. 20119789866204258
  32. ^ Lu Fei-I, Taiwan Film: Politics, Economy, Aesthetics, 1949—1994, 1998.
  33. ^ Wang, Toon. 「有良知的影片，不必要讚美」 Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. p. 202-205.
  34. ^ Chang Shih-Lun, "Discursive Formation of the 'Taiwanese New Cinema': A Historical Analysis (1965-2000)," 2001.
  35. ^ 詹宏志. 「不過每一個他們試圖要幫助侯孝賢的方法，我聽起來都是消滅侯孝賢的方法」 Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. p. 238-245.
  36. ^ Wan, Jen. 「所謂運動跟潮流絕對不是一個人的」" Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. p. 196-199.
  37. ^ 陳儒修. 「30年前的台灣新電影，意味著什麼？」 Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. p. 276-279.
  38. ^ Lu Fei-I, "Reviewing the Fifty Years of Taiwan Cinema through Numbers," 2003.
  39. ^ Wong, Kar-Wai. 「新的人會帶來新的衝擊」 Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. p. 170-173.
  40. ^ Tsai, Ming-Liang. 「新電影開始有了美學的概念」 Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. p. 174-177.
  41. ^ Alphonse Youth Leigh, "Cinema, Film, and Film Publications," Independence Evening Post, 1986. pp. 46-48.
  42. ^ 陳儒修. 「30年前的台灣新電影，意味著什麼？」 Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. pp. 276-279.
  43. ^ 詹宏志. 「不過每一個他們試圖要幫助侯孝賢的方法，我聽起來都是消滅侯孝賢的方法」 Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. p. 238-245.
  44. ^ 李湘婷，【台灣電影新浪潮　世界都看見】，Taiwan Panorama, 2015.
  45. ^ 詹志宏 et al. 「台灣新電影宣言」 Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. p. 298-301.
  46. ^ Lu Fei-I, "Reviewing the Fifty Years of Taiwan Cinema through Numbers," 2003.
  47. ^ 詹志宏 et al. 「台灣新電影宣言」 Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. p. 298-301.
  48. ^ 小野. 「那時候大家都只想做我們自己的東西」" Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. p. 206-213.
  49. ^ 彭小妍 (Peng, Hsiao-yen). “Auteurism and Taiwan New Cinema.” Xi ju yan jiu, 2012, pp. 125–48.
  50. ^ 小野. 「那時候大家都只想做我們自己的東西」" Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. p. 206-213.
  51. ^ Hou Hsiao-Hsien. 「基本上就是有限制，所以才會有反抗」 Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. p. 164-169.
  52. ^ Lee Daw-ming, "Gazging back in Retrospect: A Hundred Year of Taiwan Cinema," 2001.
  53. ^ 張, 靚蓓 (2011). 凝望.時代 : 穿越悲情城市二十年. 田園城市文化. 20119789866204258
  54. ^ Lim, Song Hwee. Taiwan Cinema as Soft Power: Authorship, Transnationality, Historiography. Oxford University Press, 2021, doi:10.1093/oso/9780197503379.001.0001.
  55. ^ Berry, Chris, and Feiyi. Lu. Island on the Edge : Taiwan New Cinema and After. Hong Kong University Press, 2005.
  56. ^ 張, 靚蓓 (2011). 凝望.時代: 穿越悲情城市二十年. 田園城市文化. ISBN 9789866204258.
  57. ^ Lee Daw-ming, "Gazging back in Retrospect: A Hundred Year of Taiwan Cinema," 2001.
  58. ^ Hou Hsiao-Hsien. 「基本上就是有限制，所以才會有反抗」 Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. p. 164-169.
  59. ^ 張, 靚蓓 (2011). 凝望.時代 : 穿越悲情城市二十年. 田園城市文化. 20119789866204258
  60. ^ Chen Kuo-fu. Revisiting the Past: Tracing the Origins of Taiwanese Cinema, 1998. p. 4.
  61. ^ Chen Kuo-fu. Revisiting the Past: Tracing the Origins of Taiwanese Cinema, 1998. p. 13.
  62. ^ Hou Hsiao-Hsien. 「基本上就是有限制，所以才會有反抗」 Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. p. 164-169.
  63. ^ Wan, Jen. 「所謂運動跟潮流絕對不是一個人的」" Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. p. 196-199.
  64. ^ Chen Kuo-fu. Revisiting the Past: Tracing the Origins of Taiwanese Cinema, 1998. pp. 54-68.
  65. ^ 詹宏志. 「不過每一個他們試圖要幫助侯孝賢的方法，我聽起來都是消滅侯孝賢的方法」 Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. p. 238-245.
  66. ^ 吳念真. 「過去那種革命情感，是我最懷念的」 Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. p. 246-249.
  67. ^ 張, 靚蓓 (2011). 凝望.時代 : 穿越悲情城市二十年. 田園城市文化. 20119789866204258
  68. ^ 張作驥. 「至於做了什麼電影，是創作者的事情」 Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. p. 264-267.
  69. ^ 詹宏志. 「不過每一個他們試圖要幫助侯孝賢的方法，我聽起來都是消滅侯孝賢的方法」 Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. p. 238-245.
  70. ^  Tweedie, James. The Age of New Waves : Art Cinema and the Staging of Globalization. Oxford University Press, 2013.
  71. ^ 李湘婷，【台灣電影新浪潮　世界都看見】，Taiwan Panorama, 2015.
  72. ^ Wong, Kar-Wai. 「新的人會帶來新的衝擊」 Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. p. 170-173.
  73. ^ Tsai, Ming-Liang. 「新電影開始有了美學的概念」 Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. p. 174-177.
  74. ^ 張, 靚蓓 (2011). 凝望.時代 : 穿越悲情城市二十年. 田園城市文化. 20119789866204258
  75. ^ Berry, Chris, and Feiyi. Lu. Island on the Edge : Taiwan New Cinema and After. Hong Kong University Press, 2005.
  76. ^ Tsai, Beth. Taiwan New Cinema at Film Festivals. Edinburgh University Press, 2023.
  77. ^ 李湘婷，【台灣電影新浪潮　世界都看見】，Taiwan Panorama, 2015.
  78. ^ 小野. 「那時候大家都只想做我們自己的東西」" Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. p. 206-213.
  79. ^ 陳儒修. 「30年前的台灣新電影，意味著什麼？」 Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. p. 276-279.
  80. ^ 張, 靚蓓 (2011). 凝望.時代 : 穿越悲情城市二十年. 田園城市文化. 20119789866204258
  81. ^ 林傳凱，【萬仁，《超級大國民》，一九九四】，《看得見的記憶：二十二部電影裡的百年臺灣電影史》， 春山出版， 2020。
  82. ^ Wan, Jen. 「所謂運動跟潮流絕對不是一個人的」" Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. p. 196-199.
  83. ^ 詹志宏 et al. 「台灣新電影宣言」 Film in Our Time: Taiwan New Cinema on the Road《光陰之旅：台灣新電影在路上》edited by 王耿瑜, 2015. p. 298-301.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Taiwan_New_Cinema&oldid=1173514219"