Talk:1933

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Year in topic

As per discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Years the year in topic paragraph is scheduled to be deleted as it largely duplicates the links in the top box, and is not consistent with other year. Any objections should be made on that page please --BozMo |talk 19:33, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Japanese occupation of Shanghai?

I deleted the date of occupation of Shanghai as unsupported by any reference I could find, including Wikipedia's and Brittanica's articles. Shanghai was occupied in 1937, not 1933.Robert A.West (Talk) 23:24, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Format

[See: Talk:1950#Format. -Wikid77 13:27, 14 December 2006 (UTC)][reply]

Could someone fix this?!

the same event - the foundation of the gestapo - is dated to 2 different dates -- one in april and one in june. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.230.72.33 (talk) 22:45, 12 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Wave image

That wave image is misleading. It's from the same day as the wave mentioned in the article, but it's obviously about 1.5 feet tall.

Gold standard

Two official 'end of the gold standard' dates are given (April, June). Checked the Gold Standard article, it was unhelpful. Twang (talk) 22:20, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.tennessean.com/article/20090718/COLUMNIST0102/907180302/1097/COLUMNIST
- In 1933 on 2011-05-25 03:05:02, 404 Not Found
- In 1933 on 2011-06-02 12:12:20, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 12:12, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

D. Vs. Delano

It kind of bothers me that it is varying between 'Franklin D. Roosevelt' and 'Franklin Delano Roosevelt.'

I was wondering if we could make it consistent?

Thanks, A random person — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:6C40:7100:7024:5BD:4D25:17B:ADFD (talk) 20:26, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]