Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Jump to content

Talk:1999 in British music

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured article candidate1999 in British music is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 29, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted

Fair use rationale for Image:PrettyFlyCover.jpg

[edit]

Image:PrettyFlyCover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:48, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Udont know me.jpg

[edit]

Image:Udont know me.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 20:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Final year of the millennium?

[edit]

Hate to nit pick, but 1999 wasn't the final year of the 2nd millennium A.D.! And generally that's the millennium the phrase "the millennium" refers to... ;)

Was this an oversight? Should I fix it? --Ecksemmess (talk) 08:33, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

need to remove it as it is incorrect to say its the last of the millennium, 2000 was the last year. Pro66 (talk) 19:51, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 1999 in British music. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:27, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Richard3120 (talk) 20:04, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 1999 in British music. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:18, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Archive didn't work for external link but this has now been updated. Richard3120 (talk) 01:33, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


What happened to the charts?

[edit]

The article 1999 in British music was covered in tags, chiefly because the content was non-standard and read something like an essay. As with some of the other Year in British music articles that were created/expanded by the same over-enthusiastic editor, I've removed the content that specifically relates to the charts and placed it in a separate article 1999 in British music charts, so as to make this article more useable. Deb (talk) 19:34, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]