Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Jump to content

Talk:All-Australian team

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Nice work on the tables Morbius; can I suggest that we have them in reverse chronological order, i.e. 2005, 2004, 2003 etc? Grant65 (Talk) 12:08, September 5, 2005 (UTC)

Fine by me.--The Brain of Morbius 12:32, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think there should be a list of the most All-Australian guernseys, in a quick count I think the top few are: Ricciutio (8), Carey, Harvey, Buckley (7), Pavlich, Cousins, Brad Johnson (6).

Should it be mentioned that Fraser Gehrig didnt make the 2005 team in spite of winning the Coleman Medal? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.245.148.53 (talk) 04:57, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Depends on how rare an occurance it is I suppose. Scotty Cummings missed the AA team in 1999 when he won the Coleman and Fev is a chance of winning the medal this year but isn't expected to be in the AA team. Not as rare as a Brownlow Medalist missing the team like in 2000 but I reckon it's still worse a mention. Jevansen (talk) 04:57, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can I ask why, for example, there is no 1990 All-Australian Team listed here? I know there were a number of methods of selecting the teams (ie. from the Carnival until 1988) but the 1990 team (and others) are officially listed on the AFL website (http://stats.afl.com.au/public/statistics/all_Australian/all_Australian_1990.shtml?season_idIndex=18&AFLstatisticMenu=1). Cheers Hoever06 (talk) 06:23, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In the publications I have, the 1990 team is called the 'AFL Team of the Year', as opposed to an All-Australian team. Such teams were selected in all but one season from 1982 to 1990. Four of those years coincided with a carnival, so two seperate teams were named. I'm not sure whether both are considered All-Australian or not but I reckon we could at least make a section listing these teams like we have done with the Sporting Life Team of the Year. Jevansen (talk) 13:23, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, same here - the 1982 to 1990 VFL/AFL Teams of the Year are listed in publications too, but clearly marked as separate sections away from the official All-Australian teams. Personally I'd prefer the Sporting Life teams and the VFL/AFL teams to be in a separate article clearly indicating they were unofficial, thus leaving the All Australian sides as they are meant to be - the official AA teams.

RossRSmith (talk) 23:17, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just think that if it is 'official' enough to be listed as the All-Australian team on the AFL website, then it should be good enough for Wikipedia. No? Hoever06 (talk) 01:29, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Origin of the Concept

[edit]

The Article currently states that the origin was Sporting Life Magazine..but I do not believe that this is so. There was discussion about the concept at the 1947 Carnival and at least one journo published an All Australian Team based on that Carnival. The concept was discussed by the ANFC with the concept originating for the USA.

See All-Australian Football Team. (1947, July 16). The Mercury (Hobart, Tas. : 1860 - 1954), p. 24. Retrieved August 22, 2013, from http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article26413694 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miketheriley (talkcontribs) 11:58, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified 2 external links on All-Australian team. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:19, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pre-2006 teams

[edit]

Hi! I like that you've gone and made separate pages for the years, as it's good to get a solid breakdown on a given year. Are there plans to do more years? I'd like to see it! I'm going to add this on the Australian rules football Projects page. Electricmaster (talk) 05:14, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Electricmaster! They only go back to 2007 because the bulk of the additional information on the full articles is the extended squad, and there were no extended squads before '07. In my opinion, it's not worth splitting them off, as the additional information would be quite minimal—but I can see an argument being made otherwise. Feel free to post on WT:AFL to seek consensus. Jjamesryan (talk | contribs) 11:16, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]