Talk:Arslantepe

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ancient Near East–related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assyria Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Assyria, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Assyrian-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.AssyriaWikipedia:WikiProject AssyriaTemplate:WikiProject AssyriaAssyrian
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Turkey Mid‑importance

	Turkey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Propose renaming and moving page to "Melid"

Since this is an archaeological site, it should be listed under its contemporary name (the usual rendering is Melid[1]).

Moved Categorystuff (talk) 01:22, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you mean 'historic' name? In any case, it has a modern name (and so presumably a modern settlement) and that name is used to identify the archaeological site (cf. links on page.) -LlywelynII (talk) 11:37, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Panoramic movie of site

Is located here. Not sure how (or whether legal) to include it on the page, though. -LlywelynII (talk) 11:37, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Louis Delaporte

Louis-Joseph Delaporte(1874-1944) and his book: "Les Hittites" (there must be an article about him!) Böri (talk) 11:55, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Name change to Arslantepe

Official name is frequently used than 'Melid'

https://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/5908/ https://www.oldest.org/culture/swords/ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287858135_Arslantepe-Malatya_A_Prehistoric_and_Early_Historic_Center_in_Eastern_Anatolia 88.230.168.151 (talk) 15:19, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't. Having the real name instead of the turkish name helps a lot. having all these turkish names a gloss over the authentic ancient anatolian names greatly obscures the history.

Article

I cleaned up the archaeology and the early period things and pulled a few weeds but the post 3rd millennium, Neo-Hittite etc, part needs much work. And I won't reopen the naming argument but I note that the site appears, as far as I can see, to have only been called Melid by the Neo-Assyrians and briefly at that, while having several earlier names. So it should be Arslantepe but that is water under the bridge.Ploversegg (talk) Ploversegg (talk) 16:08, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ploversegg Are you sure? I'd be happy with move I think. Doug Weller talk 16:52, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, an article title search for Arslantepe turns up 20X the number for Melid and some

of those are about some obscure beetle. And when a site has different names in different periods

I think its good to stick with the "archaeology" name to avoid confusion. Plus, I

hate on modern names for sites as it can attract unwanted attention. So yes I would

be comfortable with a move.Ploversegg (talk) 17:36, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ploversegg Ok. Doug Weller talk 17:40, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've poked at this article a few times in the past but now I see that it is a much more Notable site than I earlier appreciated. Ploversegg (talk) 17:49, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]