Talk:Bibi Pak Daman

Pakistan Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cemeteries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cemeteries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cemeteries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CemeteriesWikipedia:WikiProject CemeteriesTemplate:WikiProject CemeteriesCemeteries
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

2004 comment

I can't find any other mentions of this tomb on the Web. Does anyone have a cite? -- The Anome 01:08, 15 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Book : http://www.marfat.com/BookDetailPage.aspx?bookId=bda6e9bd-e96a-43af-882f-2b8517dcbb05 Taseer007 (talk) 10:32, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Daughters of Sayid Ahmed Tokhta

Some scholars consider Ruqayah to have been the daughter of Sayid Ahmed Tokhta (12th century). How one can rely on the legend, in view of difference in period:

1. In the period of Mahmud of Ghazni his army general Malik Ayaz arranged the construction of Khanqah for these ladies, during their stay in Lahore. This reference is earlier to 12th Century. See History of Shiyan-e-Ali, by Ali Hussain Rizvi (in Urdu Language) published through Imamia Academy, Karachi 2nd Edition-(2006) Pages 734 to 736 Chapter-Bibi Pak Daman.
2. If Data Gunj Bakhsh was a devotee of Bibi Pak Daman, who died in 1077 CE.

Thus legend of wife of Muslim ibn Aqeel is the acceptable legend. Nannadeem (talk) 21:40, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In 2015 Shia Multimedia Team (Pakistan) prepared a Documentary video (in Urdu language) about Bibi Pak Daman. Documentary provides historical background (dates and references), which also reveals that the legends of daughters of Sayid Ahmed Tokhta were propagated due to dispute in trusteeship for the shrine.(Video link) - Nannadeem (talk) 17:02, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bibi Pak Daman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:22, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]