Talk:Columbiana Centre

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shopping Centers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of enclosed shopping malls, outdoor shopping centers, and dead malls on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Shopping CentersWikipedia:WikiProject Shopping CentersTemplate:WikiProject Shopping CentersShopping center articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: South Carolina / History Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	South Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject South Carolina (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. history.

Columbiana Centre shooting was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 17 January 2024 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Columbiana Centre on 13 February 2024. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Remove mentioning of 2022 shooting

It seems that Wikipedia is doing away of mentioning shootings in the main article for the location. See Talk:Tops_Friendly_Markets#Buffalo_edit_war for details. Cwater1 (talk) 15:16, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Cwater1: I think you misunderstood the argument. The Tops Friendly Markets article is about a super market brand and not about a single store location. The argument was over including a shooting that was only tangentially related to the brand. In the case of the Columbiana Centre there has been a different decision to merge the Columbiana Centre shooting article into the main article about the mall. The content of each article is decided on a case by case basis and, as far as I am aware, Wikipedia has no hard and fast policy about mentioning shootings, or not, in the main article for a location, other than general ones like Undue weight, Verifiability and Notability. In this case, the shooting is notable in the context of the mall article, but not notable as a stand alone event. So, should be included in the mall article. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 11:06, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, plus the mall itself got sued for it. PARAKANYAA (talk) 15:52, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh okay. I must have been confused then. All makes sense now. Cwater1 (talk) 20:42, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]