Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Jump to content

Talk:Creedence Clearwater Revival discography

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The footnotes refer to Prince and Bruce Springsteen records on the Billboard top 100. How does that have anything to do with CCR? --Soren84 (talk) 20:43, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


I have an LP titled Chooglin' that was released in 1982 - it is a compilation album:

A1 = I Heard it Through the Grapevine
A2 = Keep on Chooglin
B1 = Suzie Q
B2 = Pagan Baby
B3 = Born on the Bayou

It has a gatefold cover. AFbrat1972-MN (talk) 13:17, 1 January 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Thanks!

[edit]

A BIG thanks to the person(s) who posted the handy info on this page. I am a Disgruntled Old Coot huddled in a hovel, a meager shanty atop the Ozark Plateau, y'all. When CCR was just starting out I lived not far away, 10 years younger than the CCR guys, a mid-Baby Boomer (Generation Jones) vice the early Boomerness of the band. I and others considered CCR to be "our" band due to groovy tunes and proximity to their stomping ground over the hill from our burgh. Looking back over the decades and the MANY MANY MANY songs and groups/artists/etc. I have heard I hereby proclaim that CCR is my favorite band. There are others that tie for 2nd-place and are oh-so close to CCR but there is a raw, basic... something about CCR that is so appealing to me. Thanks to any or all who assembled this and other CCR pages. I appreciate your efforts and thanks to any who read this post. I remain the humble, impoverished, aging Disgruntled Old Coot. Star of neither stage nor screen.Obbop (talk) 14:45, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Peak U.S. Singles chart positions

[edit]

Someone probably needs to go back in and re-check them. A vandal (fan?) gave CCR a bunch of #1 hits that they never had. AFIAR, CCR hit #2 five times on the Billboard Hot 100 and never had a number one single. After looking a little more closely, the vandal is user "S10787091" and he/she seems to have edited more than just the Singles table. It appears that all 8 edits that were made need to be undone, and I'm not adept enough at editing to make these changes without undoing the good edits that have since been done. AJC3fromS2K (talk) 01:38, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@AJC3fromS2K: I've just checked all the U.S. charts to make sure they are correct. All seems to be in order and the user has been reported. - Bossanoven (talk) 04:26, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Bossanoven: Thanks much for your efforts! AJC3fromS2K (talk) 03:12, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Creedence Clearwater Revival discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:35, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Golliwogs

[edit]

Normally I understand the distinction between an older version of a band versus a newer one (e.g. Joy Division and New Order are obviously different bands), but as The Golliwogs were quite literally the same band of guys, does anyone agree that the Golliwogs singles discography be included on this page? I know the Golliwogs page is referenced on this one, but again, it's essentially the same band under a pseudonym. YouCanDoBetter (talk) 04:44, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Joel Whitburn chart stats

[edit]

In the Billboard-endorsed "Top Pop Singles" books, Joel Whitburn's data conflicts in four places with the numbers on this page.

These are the discrepancies:

  • "Fortunate Son" peaked at #14, not #3.
  • "Who'll Stop the Rain" was a non-charting B-side, not a #2 hit.
  • "Run Through the Jungle" was a no-charting B-side, not a #4 hit.
  • "Long As I Can See the Light" was a non-charting B-side, not a #2 hit.

All four songs are significant enough to be listed. But under the US chart peak column, each should have the same hyphen representing "did not chart" that you see alongside the songs "Born on the Bayou" or "Hey Tonight."

In each case, the songs are piggybacking off the A-sides, whose chart positions are all correctly listed. But those peak chart positions apply only to the A-sides.

This information comes from Whitburn's books, which are authorized by Billboard.

I fear I would screw up the columns if I fixed it myself. I hope someone more Wiki-adept will make these corrections. 98.116.37.205 (talk) 22:39, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]